网络媒体《印度尼西亚时报》和《Tempo.co》对佐科威要求批评的新闻的框架分析(2023 年 2 月期间《印度尼西亚时报》和《Tempo.co》的框架分析)

Nursitawati Nursitawati, A. Suseno
{"title":"网络媒体《印度尼西亚时报》和《Tempo.co》对佐科威要求批评的新闻的框架分析(2023 年 2 月期间《印度尼西亚时报》和《Tempo.co》的框架分析)","authors":"Nursitawati Nursitawati, A. Suseno","doi":"10.53990/interpretasi.v3i1.242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study, entitled “Analysis of Jokowi's news framing, asked for criticism in the online media Times Indonesia and Tempo.co.”. The purpose of this study is to find out how Times Indonesia and Tempo.co framed Jokowi's news coverage asking for criticism. This study analyzes 4 news units, consisting of 2 news units from Times Indonesia and 2 news units from Tempo.co. In this study, researchers use framing theory where this theory assumes that frames are the way the media and media gatekeepers regulate the presentation of an event and the issues they cover, especially researchers using the framing theory proposed by Zhongdang Pan and Kosicki. The paradigm used in this research is constructivism with qualitative research methods. The results of this study indicate that the two media have very different and even opposite frames. Like Times Indonesia in reporting on Jokowi asking to be criticized, Times Indonesia tending to be less objective in this report, Times Indonesia going too far to heed Jokowi's policies without looking at other aspects that are also related to Jokowi asking for criticism, in contrast to Times Indonesia, Tempo.co in reporting Jokowi asking for criticism tends to try to maintain objectivity but is still embellished with a tendency to accuse Jokowi of being a paradox, but the information provided by Tempo.co is closer to the actual reality.","PeriodicalId":517665,"journal":{"name":"INTERPRETASI : Communication & Public Relation","volume":"52 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS FRAMING PEMBERITAAN JOKOWI MINTA DIKRITIK DI MEDIA ONLINE TIMES INDONESIA DAN TEMPO.CO (ANALISIS FRAMING BERITA TIMES INDONESIA DAN TEMPO.CO PERIODE FEBRUARI 2023)\",\"authors\":\"Nursitawati Nursitawati, A. Suseno\",\"doi\":\"10.53990/interpretasi.v3i1.242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study, entitled “Analysis of Jokowi's news framing, asked for criticism in the online media Times Indonesia and Tempo.co.”. The purpose of this study is to find out how Times Indonesia and Tempo.co framed Jokowi's news coverage asking for criticism. This study analyzes 4 news units, consisting of 2 news units from Times Indonesia and 2 news units from Tempo.co. In this study, researchers use framing theory where this theory assumes that frames are the way the media and media gatekeepers regulate the presentation of an event and the issues they cover, especially researchers using the framing theory proposed by Zhongdang Pan and Kosicki. The paradigm used in this research is constructivism with qualitative research methods. The results of this study indicate that the two media have very different and even opposite frames. Like Times Indonesia in reporting on Jokowi asking to be criticized, Times Indonesia tending to be less objective in this report, Times Indonesia going too far to heed Jokowi's policies without looking at other aspects that are also related to Jokowi asking for criticism, in contrast to Times Indonesia, Tempo.co in reporting Jokowi asking for criticism tends to try to maintain objectivity but is still embellished with a tendency to accuse Jokowi of being a paradox, but the information provided by Tempo.co is closer to the actual reality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERPRETASI : Communication & Public Relation\",\"volume\":\"52 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERPRETASI : Communication & Public Relation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53990/interpretasi.v3i1.242\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERPRETASI : Communication & Public Relation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53990/interpretasi.v3i1.242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究题为 "分析网络媒体《印尼时报》和Tempo.co对佐科威的新闻报道框架、要求批评"。本研究的目的是了解印尼时报和 Tempo.co 如何对佐科威的新闻报道进行框架设计,并提出批评。本研究分析了 4 个新闻单元,包括印尼《时代报》的 2 个新闻单元和 Tempo.co 的 2 个新闻单元。在本研究中,研究人员使用了框架理论,该理论认为框架是媒体和媒体把关人规范事件呈现方式和报道问题的方式,特别是研究人员使用了潘中堂和科西基提出的框架理论。本研究采用的范式是建构主义和定性研究方法。研究结果表明,两家媒体的报道框架截然不同,甚至截然相反。如《印尼时报》在报道佐科威要求批评时,倾向于降低报道的客观性,《印尼时报》过分关注佐科威的政策,而没有关注与佐科威要求批评相关的其他方面;与《印尼时报》相反,Tempo.co在报道佐科威要求批评时,倾向于努力保持客观性,但仍有美化的倾向,指责佐科威是一个悖论,但Tempo.co提供的信息更接近实际情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ANALISIS FRAMING PEMBERITAAN JOKOWI MINTA DIKRITIK DI MEDIA ONLINE TIMES INDONESIA DAN TEMPO.CO (ANALISIS FRAMING BERITA TIMES INDONESIA DAN TEMPO.CO PERIODE FEBRUARI 2023)
This study, entitled “Analysis of Jokowi's news framing, asked for criticism in the online media Times Indonesia and Tempo.co.”. The purpose of this study is to find out how Times Indonesia and Tempo.co framed Jokowi's news coverage asking for criticism. This study analyzes 4 news units, consisting of 2 news units from Times Indonesia and 2 news units from Tempo.co. In this study, researchers use framing theory where this theory assumes that frames are the way the media and media gatekeepers regulate the presentation of an event and the issues they cover, especially researchers using the framing theory proposed by Zhongdang Pan and Kosicki. The paradigm used in this research is constructivism with qualitative research methods. The results of this study indicate that the two media have very different and even opposite frames. Like Times Indonesia in reporting on Jokowi asking to be criticized, Times Indonesia tending to be less objective in this report, Times Indonesia going too far to heed Jokowi's policies without looking at other aspects that are also related to Jokowi asking for criticism, in contrast to Times Indonesia, Tempo.co in reporting Jokowi asking for criticism tends to try to maintain objectivity but is still embellished with a tendency to accuse Jokowi of being a paradox, but the information provided by Tempo.co is closer to the actual reality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ANALISIS FRAMING PEMBERITAAN JOKOWI MINTA DIKRITIK DI MEDIA ONLINE TIMES INDONESIA DAN TEMPO.CO (ANALISIS FRAMING BERITA TIMES INDONESIA DAN TEMPO.CO PERIODE FEBRUARI 2023) PERAN PUBLIK RELATIONS DALAM ISU DAN KRISIS PT. PERTAMINA (PERSERO) KEPEMIMPINAN DALAM ORGANISASI DI ERA DUNIA VIRTUAL PENGARUH KOMUNIKASI VERBAL BERBENTUK SINDIRAN ORANG TUA TERHADAP PERUBAHAN PERILAKU PEMUDA DI PERUMAHAN TAMAN ALAMANDA KABUPATEN BEKASI PERAN MARKETING DALAM MENINGKATKAN PENJUALAN UNIT RUMAH CLUSTER KOTA BABELAN PERMAI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1