Ziyi Xu, Yan Li, Lin Wang, Xuezhi Hao, Jianming Ying, Junling Li, Puyuan Xing
{"title":"通过数字液滴聚合酶链反应 ddPCR 和新一代测序技术检测第三代表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂对不同 T790M 状态的晚期 NSCLC 的疗效。","authors":"Ziyi Xu, Yan Li, Lin Wang, Xuezhi Hao, Jianming Ying, Junling Li, Puyuan Xing","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2024.2334807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We hypothesize that digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) would optimize the treatment strategies in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) relapsed patients. In this study, we compared the efficacy of third-generation TKIs with various T790M statuses via ddPCR and next-generation sequencing (NGS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>NGS was performed on blood samples of patients progressed from previous EGFR-TKIs for resistance mechanism. T790M-negative patients received further liquid biopsy using ddPCR for T790M detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cohort of 40 patients were enrolled, with 30.0% (12/40) T790M-positive via NGS (Group A). In another 28 T790M-negative patients by NGS, 11 (39.3%) were T790M-positive (Group B) and 17 (60.7%) were T790M-negative (Group C) via ddPCR. A relatively longer progression-free survival (PFS) was observed in group A (NR) and group B (10.0 months, 95% CI 7.040-12.889) than in group C (7.0 months, 95% CI 0.000-15.219), with no significant difference across all three groups (<i>p</i> = 0.196), or between group B and C (<i>p</i> = 0.412). EGFR-sensitive mutation correlated with inferior PFS (<i>p</i> = 0.041) and ORR (<i>p</i> = 0.326), and a significantly lower DCR (<i>p</i> = 0.033) in T790M-negative patients via NGS (<i>n</i> = 28).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicates that ddPCR may contribute as a supplement to NGS in liquid biopsies for T790M detection in EGFR-TKIs relapsed patients and help to optimize the treatment strategies, especially for those without coexistence of EGFR-sensitive mutation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05458726.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"183-192"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced NSCLC with different T790M statuses tested via digital droplet polymerase chain reaction ddPCR and next-generation sequencing.\",\"authors\":\"Ziyi Xu, Yan Li, Lin Wang, Xuezhi Hao, Jianming Ying, Junling Li, Puyuan Xing\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737140.2024.2334807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We hypothesize that digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) would optimize the treatment strategies in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) relapsed patients. In this study, we compared the efficacy of third-generation TKIs with various T790M statuses via ddPCR and next-generation sequencing (NGS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>NGS was performed on blood samples of patients progressed from previous EGFR-TKIs for resistance mechanism. T790M-negative patients received further liquid biopsy using ddPCR for T790M detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cohort of 40 patients were enrolled, with 30.0% (12/40) T790M-positive via NGS (Group A). In another 28 T790M-negative patients by NGS, 11 (39.3%) were T790M-positive (Group B) and 17 (60.7%) were T790M-negative (Group C) via ddPCR. A relatively longer progression-free survival (PFS) was observed in group A (NR) and group B (10.0 months, 95% CI 7.040-12.889) than in group C (7.0 months, 95% CI 0.000-15.219), with no significant difference across all three groups (<i>p</i> = 0.196), or between group B and C (<i>p</i> = 0.412). EGFR-sensitive mutation correlated with inferior PFS (<i>p</i> = 0.041) and ORR (<i>p</i> = 0.326), and a significantly lower DCR (<i>p</i> = 0.033) in T790M-negative patients via NGS (<i>n</i> = 28).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicates that ddPCR may contribute as a supplement to NGS in liquid biopsies for T790M detection in EGFR-TKIs relapsed patients and help to optimize the treatment strategies, especially for those without coexistence of EGFR-sensitive mutation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05458726.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"183-192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2024.2334807\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2024.2334807","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced NSCLC with different T790M statuses tested via digital droplet polymerase chain reaction ddPCR and next-generation sequencing.
Objectives: We hypothesize that digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) would optimize the treatment strategies in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) relapsed patients. In this study, we compared the efficacy of third-generation TKIs with various T790M statuses via ddPCR and next-generation sequencing (NGS).
Methods: NGS was performed on blood samples of patients progressed from previous EGFR-TKIs for resistance mechanism. T790M-negative patients received further liquid biopsy using ddPCR for T790M detection.
Results: A cohort of 40 patients were enrolled, with 30.0% (12/40) T790M-positive via NGS (Group A). In another 28 T790M-negative patients by NGS, 11 (39.3%) were T790M-positive (Group B) and 17 (60.7%) were T790M-negative (Group C) via ddPCR. A relatively longer progression-free survival (PFS) was observed in group A (NR) and group B (10.0 months, 95% CI 7.040-12.889) than in group C (7.0 months, 95% CI 0.000-15.219), with no significant difference across all three groups (p = 0.196), or between group B and C (p = 0.412). EGFR-sensitive mutation correlated with inferior PFS (p = 0.041) and ORR (p = 0.326), and a significantly lower DCR (p = 0.033) in T790M-negative patients via NGS (n = 28).
Conclusion: This study indicates that ddPCR may contribute as a supplement to NGS in liquid biopsies for T790M detection in EGFR-TKIs relapsed patients and help to optimize the treatment strategies, especially for those without coexistence of EGFR-sensitive mutation.
Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05458726.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches.
Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.