Jiamin Kang, Wenjun Wu, Xiangchuang Kong, Yu Su, Dingxi Liu, Chungao Li, Nan Gao, Youzhi Wang, Chuansheng Zheng, Yuxiong Weng, Lixia Wang
{"title":"利用造影剂增强磁共振神经显像技术提高腕部和掌部正中神经、尺神经以及小分支的可视化。","authors":"Jiamin Kang, Wenjun Wu, Xiangchuang Kong, Yu Su, Dingxi Liu, Chungao Li, Nan Gao, Youzhi Wang, Chuansheng Zheng, Yuxiong Weng, Lixia Wang","doi":"10.1177/17562864241239739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging of peripheral nerves in the wrist and palm is challenging due to the small size, tortuous course, complex surrounding tissues, and accompanying blood vessels. The occurrence of carpal palmar lesions leads to edema, swelling, and mass effect, which may further interfere with the display and identification of nerves.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neurography (ceMRN) improves the visualization of the morphology and pathology of the median, ulnar nerves, and their small branches in the wrist and palm.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total 57 subjects, including 36 volunteers and 21 patients with carpal palmar lesions, were enrolled and underwent ceMRN and non-contrast MRN (ncMRN) examination at 3.0 Tesla. The degree of vascular suppression, nerve visualization, diagnostic confidence, and lesion conspicuity was qualitatively assessed by two radiologists. Kappa statistics were obtained for inter-reader agreement. The signal-to-noise ratio, contrast ratio (CR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the median nerve were measured. The subjective ratings and quantitative measurements were compared between ncMRN and ceMRN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inter-reader agreement was excellent (<i>k</i> > 0.8) for all qualitative assessments and visualization assessment of each nerve segment. Compared with ncMRN, ceMRN significantly improved vascular suppression in volunteers and patients (both <i>p</i> < 0.001). The ceMRN significantly enhanced nerve visualization of each segment (all <i>p</i> < 0.05) and diagnostic confidence in volunteers and patients (both <i>p</i> < 0.05). The ceMRN improved lesion conspicuity (<i>p</i> = 0.003) in patients. Quantitatively, ceMRN had significantly higher CRs of nerve <i>versus</i> subcutaneous fat, bone marrow, and vessels and CNR of nerve <i>versus</i> vessel than ncMRN (all <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ceMRN significantly improves the visualization of peripheral nerves and pathology in the wrist and palm by robustly suppressing the signals of fat, bone marrow, and especially vessels in volunteers and patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"17 ","pages":"17562864241239739"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10964438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved visualization of median, ulnar nerves, and small branches in the wrist and palm using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neurography.\",\"authors\":\"Jiamin Kang, Wenjun Wu, Xiangchuang Kong, Yu Su, Dingxi Liu, Chungao Li, Nan Gao, Youzhi Wang, Chuansheng Zheng, Yuxiong Weng, Lixia Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562864241239739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging of peripheral nerves in the wrist and palm is challenging due to the small size, tortuous course, complex surrounding tissues, and accompanying blood vessels. The occurrence of carpal palmar lesions leads to edema, swelling, and mass effect, which may further interfere with the display and identification of nerves.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neurography (ceMRN) improves the visualization of the morphology and pathology of the median, ulnar nerves, and their small branches in the wrist and palm.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total 57 subjects, including 36 volunteers and 21 patients with carpal palmar lesions, were enrolled and underwent ceMRN and non-contrast MRN (ncMRN) examination at 3.0 Tesla. The degree of vascular suppression, nerve visualization, diagnostic confidence, and lesion conspicuity was qualitatively assessed by two radiologists. Kappa statistics were obtained for inter-reader agreement. The signal-to-noise ratio, contrast ratio (CR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the median nerve were measured. The subjective ratings and quantitative measurements were compared between ncMRN and ceMRN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inter-reader agreement was excellent (<i>k</i> > 0.8) for all qualitative assessments and visualization assessment of each nerve segment. Compared with ncMRN, ceMRN significantly improved vascular suppression in volunteers and patients (both <i>p</i> < 0.001). The ceMRN significantly enhanced nerve visualization of each segment (all <i>p</i> < 0.05) and diagnostic confidence in volunteers and patients (both <i>p</i> < 0.05). The ceMRN improved lesion conspicuity (<i>p</i> = 0.003) in patients. Quantitatively, ceMRN had significantly higher CRs of nerve <i>versus</i> subcutaneous fat, bone marrow, and vessels and CNR of nerve <i>versus</i> vessel than ncMRN (all <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ceMRN significantly improves the visualization of peripheral nerves and pathology in the wrist and palm by robustly suppressing the signals of fat, bone marrow, and especially vessels in volunteers and patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"17562864241239739\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10964438/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864241239739\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864241239739","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:由于腕部和掌部周围神经体积小、走向迂曲、周围组织复杂且伴有血管,因此腕部和掌部周围神经的磁共振成像具有挑战性。腕掌部病变会导致水肿、肿胀和肿块效应,这可能会进一步干扰神经的显示和识别:评估对比增强磁共振神经成像(ceMRN)是否能改善腕部和掌部正中神经、尺神经及其小分支形态和病理的可视化:观察研究:共 57 名受试者,包括 36 名志愿者和 21 名腕掌病变患者,在 3.0 特斯拉下接受了 ceMRN 和非对比 MRN(ncMRN)检查。两名放射科医生对血管抑制程度、神经显像、诊断可信度和病变清晰度进行了定性评估。读片者之间的一致性采用 Kappa 统计法。测量了正中神经的信噪比、对比度(CR)和对比噪声比(CNR)。比较了 ncMRN 和 ceMRN 的主观评价和定量测量结果:结果:对于每个神经节段的所有定性评估和可视化评估,阅读者之间的一致性都非常好(k > 0.8)。与 ncMRN 相比,ceMRN 明显改善了志愿者和患者的血管抑制能力(均 p p p = 0.003)。在定量方面,ceMRN 的神经相对于皮下脂肪、骨髓和血管的 CR 值以及神经相对于血管的 CNR 值均明显高于 ncMRN(均为 p 结论:ceMRN 明显改善了神经节段对血管的抑制:在志愿者和患者中,ceMRN 能有效抑制脂肪、骨髓尤其是血管的信号,从而明显改善手腕和手掌周围神经和病变的可视化。
Improved visualization of median, ulnar nerves, and small branches in the wrist and palm using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neurography.
Background: Magnetic resonance imaging of peripheral nerves in the wrist and palm is challenging due to the small size, tortuous course, complex surrounding tissues, and accompanying blood vessels. The occurrence of carpal palmar lesions leads to edema, swelling, and mass effect, which may further interfere with the display and identification of nerves.
Objective: To evaluate whether contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neurography (ceMRN) improves the visualization of the morphology and pathology of the median, ulnar nerves, and their small branches in the wrist and palm.
Design: An observational study.
Methods: In total 57 subjects, including 36 volunteers and 21 patients with carpal palmar lesions, were enrolled and underwent ceMRN and non-contrast MRN (ncMRN) examination at 3.0 Tesla. The degree of vascular suppression, nerve visualization, diagnostic confidence, and lesion conspicuity was qualitatively assessed by two radiologists. Kappa statistics were obtained for inter-reader agreement. The signal-to-noise ratio, contrast ratio (CR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the median nerve were measured. The subjective ratings and quantitative measurements were compared between ncMRN and ceMRN.
Results: The inter-reader agreement was excellent (k > 0.8) for all qualitative assessments and visualization assessment of each nerve segment. Compared with ncMRN, ceMRN significantly improved vascular suppression in volunteers and patients (both p < 0.001). The ceMRN significantly enhanced nerve visualization of each segment (all p < 0.05) and diagnostic confidence in volunteers and patients (both p < 0.05). The ceMRN improved lesion conspicuity (p = 0.003) in patients. Quantitatively, ceMRN had significantly higher CRs of nerve versus subcutaneous fat, bone marrow, and vessels and CNR of nerve versus vessel than ncMRN (all p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The ceMRN significantly improves the visualization of peripheral nerves and pathology in the wrist and palm by robustly suppressing the signals of fat, bone marrow, and especially vessels in volunteers and patients.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of neurology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in neurology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.