[严重腹腔内感染和肠瘘患者早期肠内营养安全性评估]。

T Xie, C Chen, D L Yang, W Y Wang, F Chen, Y N He, P F Wang, Y S Li
{"title":"[严重腹腔内感染和肠瘘患者早期肠内营养安全性评估]。","authors":"T Xie, C Chen, D L Yang, W Y Wang, F Chen, Y N He, P F Wang, Y S Li","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231130-00197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the safety of early enteral nutrition (EEN) support in patients with severe intra-abdominal infection and intestinal fistulas. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective cohort study. We collected relevant clinical data of 204 patients with severe intra-abdominal infection and intestinal fistulas who had been managed in the No. 1 Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University between 1 January 2017 and 1 January 2020. The patients were allocated to EEN or delayed enteral nutrition (DEN) groups depending on whether enteral nutrition had been instituted within 48 hours of admission to the intensive care unit. The primary outcome was 180-day mortality. Other outcomes included rates of intraperitoneal hemorrhage, septic shock, open abdominal cavity, bloodstream infection, mechanical ventilation, and continuous renal replacement therapy. Risk factors for mortality were analyzed by logistic regression. <b>Results:</b> There were no significant differences in hematological data or other baseline characteristics between the two groups at the time of admission to the intensive care unit (all <i>P</i>>0.05). However, septic shock (31.2% [15/48] vs. 15.4% [24/156], χ<sup>2</sup>=4.99, <i>P</i>=0.025), continuous renal replacement therapy (27.1% [13/48] versus 9.0% [14/156], χ<sup>2</sup>=8.96, <i>P</i>=0.003), and 180-day mortality (31.2% [15/48] vs. 7.7% [12/156], χ<sup>2</sup>=15.75, <i>P</i><0.001) were significantly more frequent in the EEN than the DEN group (all <i>P</i><0.05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that older age (OR=1.082, 95%CI:1.027-1.139,<i>P</i>=0.003), worse Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores (OR=1.189, 95%CI: 1.037-1.363, <i>P</i>=0.013), higher C-reactive protein (OR=1.013, 95%CI:1.004-1.023, <i>P</i>=0.007) and EEN (OR=8.844, 95%CI:1.809- 43.240, <i>P</i>=0.007) were independent risk factors for death in patients with severe intra-abdominal infection and intestinal fistulas. <b>Conclusion:</b> EEN may lead to adverse events and increase mortality in patients with both enterocutaneous fistulas and severe abdominal infection. EEN should be implemented with caution in such patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23959,"journal":{"name":"中华胃肠外科杂志","volume":"27 3","pages":"241-246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Evaluation of safety of early enteral nutrition in patients with severe intra-abdominal infection and intestinal fistulas].\",\"authors\":\"T Xie, C Chen, D L Yang, W Y Wang, F Chen, Y N He, P F Wang, Y S Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231130-00197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the safety of early enteral nutrition (EEN) support in patients with severe intra-abdominal infection and intestinal fistulas. <b>Methods:</b> This was a retrospective cohort study. We collected relevant clinical data of 204 patients with severe intra-abdominal infection and intestinal fistulas who had been managed in the No. 1 Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University between 1 January 2017 and 1 January 2020. The patients were allocated to EEN or delayed enteral nutrition (DEN) groups depending on whether enteral nutrition had been instituted within 48 hours of admission to the intensive care unit. The primary outcome was 180-day mortality. Other outcomes included rates of intraperitoneal hemorrhage, septic shock, open abdominal cavity, bloodstream infection, mechanical ventilation, and continuous renal replacement therapy. Risk factors for mortality were analyzed by logistic regression. <b>Results:</b> There were no significant differences in hematological data or other baseline characteristics between the two groups at the time of admission to the intensive care unit (all <i>P</i>>0.05). However, septic shock (31.2% [15/48] vs. 15.4% [24/156], χ<sup>2</sup>=4.99, <i>P</i>=0.025), continuous renal replacement therapy (27.1% [13/48] versus 9.0% [14/156], χ<sup>2</sup>=8.96, <i>P</i>=0.003), and 180-day mortality (31.2% [15/48] vs. 7.7% [12/156], χ<sup>2</sup>=15.75, <i>P</i><0.001) were significantly more frequent in the EEN than the DEN group (all <i>P</i><0.05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that older age (OR=1.082, 95%CI:1.027-1.139,<i>P</i>=0.003), worse Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores (OR=1.189, 95%CI: 1.037-1.363, <i>P</i>=0.013), higher C-reactive protein (OR=1.013, 95%CI:1.004-1.023, <i>P</i>=0.007) and EEN (OR=8.844, 95%CI:1.809- 43.240, <i>P</i>=0.007) were independent risk factors for death in patients with severe intra-abdominal infection and intestinal fistulas. <b>Conclusion:</b> EEN may lead to adverse events and increase mortality in patients with both enterocutaneous fistulas and severe abdominal infection. EEN should be implemented with caution in such patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华胃肠外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"241-246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华胃肠外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231130-00197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华胃肠外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20231130-00197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估严重腹腔内感染和肠瘘患者早期肠内营养支持(EEN)的安全性。方法: 这是一项回顾性队列研究:这是一项回顾性队列研究。我们收集了 2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 1 月 1 日期间在上海交通大学附属第九人民医院普外科一病区接受治疗的 204 例严重腹腔内感染和肠瘘患者的相关临床资料。根据患者是否在入住重症监护室后48小时内开始肠内营养,将其分配到肠内营养(EEN)组或延迟肠内营养(DEN)组。主要结果是 180 天死亡率。其他结果包括腹腔内出血、脓毒性休克、开放性腹腔、血流感染、机械通气和持续肾脏替代治疗的发生率。通过逻辑回归分析了死亡率的风险因素。结果显示两组患者在入住重症监护室时的血液学数据或其他基线特征无明显差异(P>0.05)。但是,脓毒性休克(31.2% [15/48] 对 15.4% [24/156],χ2=4.99,P=0.025)、持续肾脏替代治疗(27.1% [13/48] 对 9.0% [14/156],χ2=8.96,P=0.003),180 天死亡率(31.2% [15/48] 对 7.7% [12/156],χ2=15.75,PPP=0.003),急性生理学和慢性健康评价(APACHE)II 评分更差(OR=1.189,95%CI:1.037-1.363,P=0.013)、较高的C反应蛋白(OR=1.013,95%CI:1.004-1.023,P=0.007)和EEN(OR=8.844,95%CI:1.809- 43.240,P=0.007)是严重腹腔内感染和肠瘘患者死亡的独立危险因素。结论对于同时患有肠瘘和严重腹腔感染的患者,EEN可能会导致不良事件并增加死亡率。对此类患者应谨慎实施 EEN。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Evaluation of safety of early enteral nutrition in patients with severe intra-abdominal infection and intestinal fistulas].

Objective: To evaluate the safety of early enteral nutrition (EEN) support in patients with severe intra-abdominal infection and intestinal fistulas. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. We collected relevant clinical data of 204 patients with severe intra-abdominal infection and intestinal fistulas who had been managed in the No. 1 Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University between 1 January 2017 and 1 January 2020. The patients were allocated to EEN or delayed enteral nutrition (DEN) groups depending on whether enteral nutrition had been instituted within 48 hours of admission to the intensive care unit. The primary outcome was 180-day mortality. Other outcomes included rates of intraperitoneal hemorrhage, septic shock, open abdominal cavity, bloodstream infection, mechanical ventilation, and continuous renal replacement therapy. Risk factors for mortality were analyzed by logistic regression. Results: There were no significant differences in hematological data or other baseline characteristics between the two groups at the time of admission to the intensive care unit (all P>0.05). However, septic shock (31.2% [15/48] vs. 15.4% [24/156], χ2=4.99, P=0.025), continuous renal replacement therapy (27.1% [13/48] versus 9.0% [14/156], χ2=8.96, P=0.003), and 180-day mortality (31.2% [15/48] vs. 7.7% [12/156], χ2=15.75, P<0.001) were significantly more frequent in the EEN than the DEN group (all P<0.05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that older age (OR=1.082, 95%CI:1.027-1.139,P=0.003), worse Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores (OR=1.189, 95%CI: 1.037-1.363, P=0.013), higher C-reactive protein (OR=1.013, 95%CI:1.004-1.023, P=0.007) and EEN (OR=8.844, 95%CI:1.809- 43.240, P=0.007) were independent risk factors for death in patients with severe intra-abdominal infection and intestinal fistulas. Conclusion: EEN may lead to adverse events and increase mortality in patients with both enterocutaneous fistulas and severe abdominal infection. EEN should be implemented with caution in such patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华胃肠外科杂志
中华胃肠外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6776
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
[From following to surpassing: insight into GIST treatment development in China]. [Onco-metabolic surgery: the bridge between curative resection of gastric cancer and the remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus]. [Long-term prognosis of surgical treatment for peri-gastric cardial gastrointestinal stromal tumors]. [Rethinking several issues related to surgical treatment for advanced GIST in the era of targeted therapy]. [Standardized surgical procedure for natural orifice specimen extraction surgery of precision functional sphincter-preserving surgery for ultra-low rectal cancer (NOSES-PPS) (2024 edition)].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1