Tatjana Maravić, Claudia Mazzitelli, Allegra Comba, Uros Josic, Federico Del Bianc, Annamaria Forte, Darko Vasiljević, Larisa Blažić, Lorenzo Breschi, Annalisa Mazzoni
{"title":"使用不同的桩核和牙冠材料修复前臼齿时的应力:有限元分析研究","authors":"Tatjana Maravić, Claudia Mazzitelli, Allegra Comba, Uros Josic, Federico Del Bianc, Annamaria Forte, Darko Vasiljević, Larisa Blažić, Lorenzo Breschi, Annalisa Mazzoni","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of three post-and-core systems and two crown materials on stresses in restored premolars using Finite Element Analysis (FEA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A maxillary second premolar 3D model was created in SolidWorks 2014 (Dassault Systémés). Severe loss of tooth structure was simulated with six restorative options: 1) glass-fiber-reinforced composite post and composite core (GFRC)+CAD/CAM leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crown (LRC); 2) carbon-fiberreinforced composite post and composite core (CFRC)+LRC; 3) metal cast post-and-core (MPC)+LRC 4) GFRC+CAD/CAM composite resin crown (CC); 5) CFRC+CC; 6) MPC+CC. Three-point occlusal loading (150N) was simulated and von Misses and maximum principal stresses calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although maximum von Mises stresses in the crown and dentin were similar across groups (137.9-139.2MPa crown; 17.2-19.6 dentin), there were important differences in stress distribution in dentin. Only in MPC+CC group the maximum stresses were on the bottom of the post preparation cavity. Stress values within the posts were: CFRC(4.8MPa)>GFRC(6.7MPa)>MPC(10.3MPa). CC-restored models presented higher von Mises stresses within the post-and-core compared to the LRC groups. Maximum principal stresses were lower compared to von Mises stresses, following the same trend, and were distributed similarly in all the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both GFRC and CFRC showed favourable stresses distribution in the dentin and restorative materials, while MPC increased stresses in core, post and post cement. The more rigid crown material seems to transmit less stresses to the underlying core and crown cement compared to CC.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stresses in Premolars Restored Using Different Post-and-Core and Crown Materials: An FEA Study.\",\"authors\":\"Tatjana Maravić, Claudia Mazzitelli, Allegra Comba, Uros Josic, Federico Del Bianc, Annamaria Forte, Darko Vasiljević, Larisa Blažić, Lorenzo Breschi, Annalisa Mazzoni\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.8839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of three post-and-core systems and two crown materials on stresses in restored premolars using Finite Element Analysis (FEA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A maxillary second premolar 3D model was created in SolidWorks 2014 (Dassault Systémés). Severe loss of tooth structure was simulated with six restorative options: 1) glass-fiber-reinforced composite post and composite core (GFRC)+CAD/CAM leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crown (LRC); 2) carbon-fiberreinforced composite post and composite core (CFRC)+LRC; 3) metal cast post-and-core (MPC)+LRC 4) GFRC+CAD/CAM composite resin crown (CC); 5) CFRC+CC; 6) MPC+CC. Three-point occlusal loading (150N) was simulated and von Misses and maximum principal stresses calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although maximum von Mises stresses in the crown and dentin were similar across groups (137.9-139.2MPa crown; 17.2-19.6 dentin), there were important differences in stress distribution in dentin. Only in MPC+CC group the maximum stresses were on the bottom of the post preparation cavity. Stress values within the posts were: CFRC(4.8MPa)>GFRC(6.7MPa)>MPC(10.3MPa). CC-restored models presented higher von Mises stresses within the post-and-core compared to the LRC groups. Maximum principal stresses were lower compared to von Mises stresses, following the same trend, and were distributed similarly in all the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both GFRC and CFRC showed favourable stresses distribution in the dentin and restorative materials, while MPC increased stresses in core, post and post cement. The more rigid crown material seems to transmit less stresses to the underlying core and crown cement compared to CC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"1-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是利用有限元分析(FEA)研究三种桩核系统和两种牙冠材料对修复后前磨牙应力的影响:用 SolidWorks 2014(达索系统公司)创建了上颌第二前磨牙三维模型。用六种修复方案模拟牙齿结构的严重缺损:1)玻璃纤维增强复合材料柱和复合材料核(GFRC)+CAD/CAM白榴石增强玻璃陶瓷冠(LRC);2)碳纤维增强复合材料柱和复合材料核(CFRC)+LRC;3)金属铸造柱和复合材料核(MPC)+LRC;4)GFRC+CAD/CAM复合树脂冠(CC);5)CFRC+CC;6)MPC+CC。模拟三点咬合加载(150N)并计算 von Misses 和最大主应力:虽然各组牙冠和牙本质中的最大 von Mises 应力相似(牙冠 137.9-139.2 兆帕;牙本质 17.2-19.6),但牙本质中的应力分布却存在重大差异。只有 MPC+CC 组的最大应力位于牙本质预备洞的底部。牙柱内的应力值为CFRC(4.8MPa)>GFRC(6.7MPa)>MPC(10.3MPa)。与 LRC 组相比,CC 修复模型的柱芯内的 von Mises 应力更高。与 von Mises 应力相比,最大主应力较低,趋势相同,并且在所有组别中分布相似:结论:GFRC 和 CFRC 在牙本质和修复材料中都显示出良好的应力分布,而 MPC 则增加了牙本质、基底和基底粘结剂中的应力。与 CC 相比,硬度更高的牙冠材料传递给下层牙本质和牙冠粘结剂的应力似乎更小。
Stresses in Premolars Restored Using Different Post-and-Core and Crown Materials: An FEA Study.
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of three post-and-core systems and two crown materials on stresses in restored premolars using Finite Element Analysis (FEA).
Materials and methods: A maxillary second premolar 3D model was created in SolidWorks 2014 (Dassault Systémés). Severe loss of tooth structure was simulated with six restorative options: 1) glass-fiber-reinforced composite post and composite core (GFRC)+CAD/CAM leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crown (LRC); 2) carbon-fiberreinforced composite post and composite core (CFRC)+LRC; 3) metal cast post-and-core (MPC)+LRC 4) GFRC+CAD/CAM composite resin crown (CC); 5) CFRC+CC; 6) MPC+CC. Three-point occlusal loading (150N) was simulated and von Misses and maximum principal stresses calculated.
Results: Although maximum von Mises stresses in the crown and dentin were similar across groups (137.9-139.2MPa crown; 17.2-19.6 dentin), there were important differences in stress distribution in dentin. Only in MPC+CC group the maximum stresses were on the bottom of the post preparation cavity. Stress values within the posts were: CFRC(4.8MPa)>GFRC(6.7MPa)>MPC(10.3MPa). CC-restored models presented higher von Mises stresses within the post-and-core compared to the LRC groups. Maximum principal stresses were lower compared to von Mises stresses, following the same trend, and were distributed similarly in all the groups.
Conclusions: Both GFRC and CFRC showed favourable stresses distribution in the dentin and restorative materials, while MPC increased stresses in core, post and post cement. The more rigid crown material seems to transmit less stresses to the underlying core and crown cement compared to CC.