用蒙特卡罗方法评估湿度传感器校准的不确定性

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION MAPAN Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1007/s12647-024-00742-5
Mingming Wei, Chunhua Wen, Changchun Li, Jie Miao
{"title":"用蒙特卡罗方法评估湿度传感器校准的不确定性","authors":"Mingming Wei,&nbsp;Chunhua Wen,&nbsp;Changchun Li,&nbsp;Jie Miao","doi":"10.1007/s12647-024-00742-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To effectively solve the problem that the measurement uncertainty evaluation result is not accurate and the calculation is complicated when the humidity measuring instrument is calibrated. The “Monte Carlo simulation method” (MCM) was proposed to evaluate the measurement uncertainty of humidity sensor calibration results. In this process, firstly, by analyzing the calibration process of humidity sensor, the measurement model that can accurately and completely reflect the actual measurement situation is constructed; then, design a performance testing method for the humidity generator to obtain parameter data that can truly reflect the performance of the current humidity generator; finally, taking the 55%RH calibration point as an example, by using the above measurement model and related parameters, single MCM method and adaptive MCM method were used to evaluate the measurement uncertainty of the humidity sensor calibration results. The evaluation results obtained are the same as: the best estimated value of humidity sensor measurement error Δ<i>H</i> = 0.01%RH, the standard uncertainty <i>u</i>(Δ<i>H</i>) = 0.14%RH, and the shortest coverage interval [Δ<i>H</i><sub>low</sub>, Δ<i>H</i><sub>high</sub>] = [− 0.24%RH, 0.26%RH] when the coverage probability is 95%. Through this application experiment on the MCM method, it was found that compared to the GUM method, the MCM method can effectively improve the credibility of the measurement uncertainty results of the humidity sensor. Moreover, when the adaptive MCM method is applied to evaluate the measurement uncertainty of the humidity sensor, compared to the single MCM method, it can effectively reduce simulation times, reduce storage space resources, and improve evaluation efficiency. Prioritizing the adaptive MCM method in practical operation is recommended.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":689,"journal":{"name":"MAPAN","volume":"39 3","pages":"625 - 635"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Humidity Sensor Calibration Uncertainty by Monte Carlo Method\",\"authors\":\"Mingming Wei,&nbsp;Chunhua Wen,&nbsp;Changchun Li,&nbsp;Jie Miao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12647-024-00742-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To effectively solve the problem that the measurement uncertainty evaluation result is not accurate and the calculation is complicated when the humidity measuring instrument is calibrated. The “Monte Carlo simulation method” (MCM) was proposed to evaluate the measurement uncertainty of humidity sensor calibration results. In this process, firstly, by analyzing the calibration process of humidity sensor, the measurement model that can accurately and completely reflect the actual measurement situation is constructed; then, design a performance testing method for the humidity generator to obtain parameter data that can truly reflect the performance of the current humidity generator; finally, taking the 55%RH calibration point as an example, by using the above measurement model and related parameters, single MCM method and adaptive MCM method were used to evaluate the measurement uncertainty of the humidity sensor calibration results. The evaluation results obtained are the same as: the best estimated value of humidity sensor measurement error Δ<i>H</i> = 0.01%RH, the standard uncertainty <i>u</i>(Δ<i>H</i>) = 0.14%RH, and the shortest coverage interval [Δ<i>H</i><sub>low</sub>, Δ<i>H</i><sub>high</sub>] = [− 0.24%RH, 0.26%RH] when the coverage probability is 95%. Through this application experiment on the MCM method, it was found that compared to the GUM method, the MCM method can effectively improve the credibility of the measurement uncertainty results of the humidity sensor. Moreover, when the adaptive MCM method is applied to evaluate the measurement uncertainty of the humidity sensor, compared to the single MCM method, it can effectively reduce simulation times, reduce storage space resources, and improve evaluation efficiency. Prioritizing the adaptive MCM method in practical operation is recommended.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MAPAN\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"625 - 635\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MAPAN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12647-024-00742-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MAPAN","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12647-024-00742-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为有效解决湿度测量仪器校准时测量不确定度评定结果不准确、计算复杂的问题。提出了 "蒙特卡罗模拟法"(MCM)来评价湿度传感器标定结果的测量不确定度。在此过程中,首先通过分析湿度传感器的标定过程,构建能够准确、完整地反映实际测量情况的测量模型;然后,设计湿度发生器的性能测试方法,获取能够真实反映当前湿度发生器性能的参数数据;最后,以 55%RH 标定点为例,利用上述测量模型和相关参数,采用单一 MCM 法和自适应 MCM 法对湿度传感器标定结果的测量不确定度进行评估。得到的评估结果相同:湿度传感器测量误差的最佳估计值 ΔH = 0.01%RH,标准不确定度 u(ΔH) = 0.14%RH,当覆盖概率为 95% 时,最短覆盖区间 [ΔHlow, ΔHhigh] = [- 0.24%RH, 0.26%RH]。通过对 MCM 方法的应用实验发现,与 GUM 方法相比,MCM 方法能有效提高湿度传感器测量不确定度结果的可信度。此外,应用自适应 MCM 方法评估湿度传感器的测量不确定度时,与单一 MCM 方法相比,可有效缩短模拟时间,减少存储空间资源,提高评估效率。建议在实际操作中优先采用自适应 MCM 方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Humidity Sensor Calibration Uncertainty by Monte Carlo Method

To effectively solve the problem that the measurement uncertainty evaluation result is not accurate and the calculation is complicated when the humidity measuring instrument is calibrated. The “Monte Carlo simulation method” (MCM) was proposed to evaluate the measurement uncertainty of humidity sensor calibration results. In this process, firstly, by analyzing the calibration process of humidity sensor, the measurement model that can accurately and completely reflect the actual measurement situation is constructed; then, design a performance testing method for the humidity generator to obtain parameter data that can truly reflect the performance of the current humidity generator; finally, taking the 55%RH calibration point as an example, by using the above measurement model and related parameters, single MCM method and adaptive MCM method were used to evaluate the measurement uncertainty of the humidity sensor calibration results. The evaluation results obtained are the same as: the best estimated value of humidity sensor measurement error ΔH = 0.01%RH, the standard uncertainty uH) = 0.14%RH, and the shortest coverage interval [ΔHlow, ΔHhigh] = [− 0.24%RH, 0.26%RH] when the coverage probability is 95%. Through this application experiment on the MCM method, it was found that compared to the GUM method, the MCM method can effectively improve the credibility of the measurement uncertainty results of the humidity sensor. Moreover, when the adaptive MCM method is applied to evaluate the measurement uncertainty of the humidity sensor, compared to the single MCM method, it can effectively reduce simulation times, reduce storage space resources, and improve evaluation efficiency. Prioritizing the adaptive MCM method in practical operation is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MAPAN
MAPAN 工程技术-物理:应用
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: MAPAN-Journal Metrology Society of India is a quarterly publication. It is exclusively devoted to Metrology (Scientific, Industrial or Legal). It has been fulfilling an important need of Metrologists and particularly of quality practitioners by publishing exclusive articles on scientific, industrial and legal metrology. The journal publishes research communication or technical articles of current interest in measurement science; original work, tutorial or survey papers in any metrology related area; reviews and analytical studies in metrology; case studies on reliability, uncertainty in measurements; and reports and results of intercomparison and proficiency testing.
期刊最新文献
Techniques for High Accuracy User Position Estimation Using NavIC Constellation Modified Refractivity-Based Lifted Index Using Exact Formula for Lifted Condensation Level Design and Performance Analysis of Graphene Integrated CPW Fed Fractal Antennae for 5G mm-Wave and Ground Based Navigation Applications A Novel Stepped-Flower Shaped UWB Frequency Reconfigurable Printed Filtering Antenna Using PIN Diodes with Trackable Notch-Band for Mid-5G Band & X-Band Applications Summer-Time Monitoring And Source Apportionment Study Of Both Coarse, Fine, And Ultra-Fine Particulate Pollution In Eastern Himalayan Darjeeling: A Hint To Health Risk During Peak Tourist Season
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1