用于预防复发性艰难梭菌感染的活生物治疗产品。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1177/10600280241239685
Natasha N Pettit, Kristy M Shaeer, Elias B Chahine
{"title":"用于预防复发性艰难梭菌感染的活生物治疗产品。","authors":"Natasha N Pettit, Kristy M Shaeer, Elias B Chahine","doi":"10.1177/10600280241239685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review the efficacy, safety, and role of live biotherapeutic products (LBPs) in the prevention of recurrent <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (rCDI).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar (through February 2024) with search terms RBX2660, SER-109, and fecal microbiota. Other resources included abstracts presented at recent conferences, national clinical practice guidelines, and manufacturers' websites.</p><p><strong>Study selection and data extraction: </strong>All relevant studies, trial updates, conference abstracts, and guidelines in the English language were included.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Two LBPs were recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of recurrence in adults following antibiotic treatment for rCDI. Fecal microbiota, live-jslm is administered rectally as a retention enema, whereas fecal microbiota spores, live-brpk is given orally after bowel preparation. Several phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials have established the safety and efficacy of these LBPs in reducing rates of rCDI compared with placebo. Patients with severe immunosuppression and those with inflammatory bowel disease were largely excluded from these trials.</p><p><strong>Relevance to patient care and clinical practice in comparison with existing drugs: </strong>Live biotherapeutic products offer a similar mechanism to conventional fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) in preventing rCDI through microbiota restoration. The primary advantages of LBPs over FMT are their standardized composition and donor stool screening processes for transmissible pathogens. Bezlotoxumab is also available for the prevention of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection; however, there are no clinical data available to compare the efficacy of LBPs with bezlotoxumab, and the benefit of simultaneous use of these preventative therapies is unclear.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Live biotherapeutic products provide a safe and effective option for the prevention of rCDI and represent an improvement over conventional FMT. Additional studies are needed to further determine their place in therapy relative to bezlotoxumab and in the setting of immunosuppression and inflammatory bowel disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Live Biotherapeutic Products for the Prevention of Recurrent <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> Infection.\",\"authors\":\"Natasha N Pettit, Kristy M Shaeer, Elias B Chahine\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10600280241239685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review the efficacy, safety, and role of live biotherapeutic products (LBPs) in the prevention of recurrent <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (rCDI).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar (through February 2024) with search terms RBX2660, SER-109, and fecal microbiota. Other resources included abstracts presented at recent conferences, national clinical practice guidelines, and manufacturers' websites.</p><p><strong>Study selection and data extraction: </strong>All relevant studies, trial updates, conference abstracts, and guidelines in the English language were included.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Two LBPs were recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of recurrence in adults following antibiotic treatment for rCDI. Fecal microbiota, live-jslm is administered rectally as a retention enema, whereas fecal microbiota spores, live-brpk is given orally after bowel preparation. Several phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials have established the safety and efficacy of these LBPs in reducing rates of rCDI compared with placebo. Patients with severe immunosuppression and those with inflammatory bowel disease were largely excluded from these trials.</p><p><strong>Relevance to patient care and clinical practice in comparison with existing drugs: </strong>Live biotherapeutic products offer a similar mechanism to conventional fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) in preventing rCDI through microbiota restoration. The primary advantages of LBPs over FMT are their standardized composition and donor stool screening processes for transmissible pathogens. Bezlotoxumab is also available for the prevention of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection; however, there are no clinical data available to compare the efficacy of LBPs with bezlotoxumab, and the benefit of simultaneous use of these preventative therapies is unclear.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Live biotherapeutic products provide a safe and effective option for the prevention of rCDI and represent an improvement over conventional FMT. Additional studies are needed to further determine their place in therapy relative to bezlotoxumab and in the setting of immunosuppression and inflammatory bowel disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280241239685\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280241239685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的回顾活生物治疗产品(LBPs)在预防艰难梭菌复发性感染(rCDI)中的疗效、安全性和作用:使用 PubMed 和 Google Scholar 进行文献检索(至 2024 年 2 月),检索词为 RBX2660、SER-109 和粪便微生物群。其他资源包括近期会议摘要、国家临床实践指南和制造商网站:纳入所有相关的英文研究、试验更新、会议摘要和指南:最近,美国食品和药物管理局批准了两种枸杞多糖用于预防成人 rCDI 抗生素治疗后的复发。粪便微生物活菌-jslm以保留灌肠的方式直肠给药,而粪便微生物孢子活菌-brpk则在肠道准备后口服。几项 2 期和 3 期临床试验证实,与安慰剂相比,这些粪便微生物菌群在降低 rCDI 发生率方面具有安全性和有效性。这些试验主要排除了严重免疫抑制患者和炎症性肠病患者:活生物治疗产品在通过恢复微生物群预防 rCDI 方面的机制与传统的粪便微生物群移植(FMT)类似。与 FMT 相比,活体生物治疗产品的主要优势在于其标准化的成分和供体粪便中可传播病原体的筛查过程。贝珠单抗也可用于预防艰难梭菌感染;但目前还没有临床数据可比较枸杞多糖与贝珠单抗的疗效,同时使用这些预防性疗法的益处也不明确:结论:活体生物治疗产品为预防 rCDI 提供了一种安全有效的选择,是对传统 FMT 的改进。还需要进行更多的研究,以进一步确定活生物治疗产品在免疫抑制和炎症性肠病治疗中相对于贝珠单抗的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Live Biotherapeutic Products for the Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection.

Objective: To review the efficacy, safety, and role of live biotherapeutic products (LBPs) in the prevention of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI).

Data sources: A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar (through February 2024) with search terms RBX2660, SER-109, and fecal microbiota. Other resources included abstracts presented at recent conferences, national clinical practice guidelines, and manufacturers' websites.

Study selection and data extraction: All relevant studies, trial updates, conference abstracts, and guidelines in the English language were included.

Data synthesis: Two LBPs were recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of recurrence in adults following antibiotic treatment for rCDI. Fecal microbiota, live-jslm is administered rectally as a retention enema, whereas fecal microbiota spores, live-brpk is given orally after bowel preparation. Several phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials have established the safety and efficacy of these LBPs in reducing rates of rCDI compared with placebo. Patients with severe immunosuppression and those with inflammatory bowel disease were largely excluded from these trials.

Relevance to patient care and clinical practice in comparison with existing drugs: Live biotherapeutic products offer a similar mechanism to conventional fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) in preventing rCDI through microbiota restoration. The primary advantages of LBPs over FMT are their standardized composition and donor stool screening processes for transmissible pathogens. Bezlotoxumab is also available for the prevention of Clostridioides difficile infection; however, there are no clinical data available to compare the efficacy of LBPs with bezlotoxumab, and the benefit of simultaneous use of these preventative therapies is unclear.

Conclusions: Live biotherapeutic products provide a safe and effective option for the prevention of rCDI and represent an improvement over conventional FMT. Additional studies are needed to further determine their place in therapy relative to bezlotoxumab and in the setting of immunosuppression and inflammatory bowel disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1