英国生物库中的大规模血浆蛋白质组学研究可适度提高对既往未患心血管疾病人群中重大心血管事件的预测能力。

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European journal of preventive cardiology Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1093/eurjpc/zwae124
Patrick Royer, Elias Björnson, Martin Adiels, Rebecca Josefson, Eva Hagberg, Anders Gummesson, Göran Bergström
{"title":"英国生物库中的大规模血浆蛋白质组学研究可适度提高对既往未患心血管疾病人群中重大心血管事件的预测能力。","authors":"Patrick Royer, Elias Björnson, Martin Adiels, Rebecca Josefson, Eva Hagberg, Anders Gummesson, Göran Bergström","doi":"10.1093/eurjpc/zwae124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Improved identification of individuals at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease would enable targeted interventions and potentially lead to reductions in mortality and morbidity. Our aim was to determine whether use of large-scale proteomics improves prediction of cardiovascular events beyond traditional risk factors (TRFs).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Using proximity extension assays, 2919 plasma proteins were measured in 38 380 participants of the UK Biobank. Both data- and literature-based feature selection and trained models using extreme gradient boosting machine learning were used to predict risk of major cardiovascular events (MACEs: fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary artery revascularization) during a 10-year follow-up. Area under the curve (AUC) and net reclassification index (NRI) were used to evaluate the additive value of selected protein panels to MACE prediction by Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2) or the 10 TRFs used in SCORE2. SCORE2 and SCORE2 refitted to UK Biobank data predicted MACE with AUCs of 0.740 and 0.749, respectively. Data-driven selection identified 114 proteins of greatest relevance for prediction. Prediction of MACE was not improved by using these proteins alone (AUC of 0.758) but was significantly improved by combining these proteins with SCORE2 or the 10 TRFs (AUC = 0.771, P < 001, NRI = 0.140, and AUC = 0.767, P = 0.03, NRI 0.053, respectively). Literature-based protein selection (113 proteins from five previous studies) also improved risk prediction beyond TRFs while a random selection of 114 proteins did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Large-scale plasma proteomics with data-driven and literature-based protein selection modestly improves prediction of future MACE beyond TRFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12051,"journal":{"name":"European journal of preventive cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1681-1689"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large-scale plasma proteomics in the UK Biobank modestly improves prediction of major cardiovascular events in a population without previous cardiovascular disease.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Royer, Elias Björnson, Martin Adiels, Rebecca Josefson, Eva Hagberg, Anders Gummesson, Göran Bergström\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/eurjpc/zwae124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Improved identification of individuals at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease would enable targeted interventions and potentially lead to reductions in mortality and morbidity. Our aim was to determine whether use of large-scale proteomics improves prediction of cardiovascular events beyond traditional risk factors (TRFs).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Using proximity extension assays, 2919 plasma proteins were measured in 38 380 participants of the UK Biobank. Both data- and literature-based feature selection and trained models using extreme gradient boosting machine learning were used to predict risk of major cardiovascular events (MACEs: fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary artery revascularization) during a 10-year follow-up. Area under the curve (AUC) and net reclassification index (NRI) were used to evaluate the additive value of selected protein panels to MACE prediction by Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2) or the 10 TRFs used in SCORE2. SCORE2 and SCORE2 refitted to UK Biobank data predicted MACE with AUCs of 0.740 and 0.749, respectively. Data-driven selection identified 114 proteins of greatest relevance for prediction. Prediction of MACE was not improved by using these proteins alone (AUC of 0.758) but was significantly improved by combining these proteins with SCORE2 or the 10 TRFs (AUC = 0.771, P < 001, NRI = 0.140, and AUC = 0.767, P = 0.03, NRI 0.053, respectively). Literature-based protein selection (113 proteins from five previous studies) also improved risk prediction beyond TRFs while a random selection of 114 proteins did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Large-scale plasma proteomics with data-driven and literature-based protein selection modestly improves prediction of future MACE beyond TRFs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of preventive cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1681-1689\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of preventive cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwae124\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwae124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:提高对心血管疾病高危人群的识别能力将有助于采取有针对性的干预措施,并有可能降低死亡率和发病率。我们的目的是确定大规模蛋白质组学的使用是否能超越传统的风险因素(TRFs),提高对心血管事件的预测能力:方法:利用近距离延伸测定法,对英国生物库的 38 380 名参与者的 2919 种血浆蛋白质进行了测量。采用基于数据和文献的特征选择以及使用极端梯度提升机器学习训练的模型来预测10年随访期间发生重大心血管事件(MACE:致命和非致命心肌梗死、中风和冠状动脉血运重建)的风险。曲线下面积(AUC)和净再分类指数(NRI)用于评估选定蛋白质面板对系统性冠状动脉风险评估2(SCORE2)或SCORE2中使用的10个TRF预测MACE的附加价值:SCORE2和SCORE2重新拟合英国生物库数据预测MACE的AUC分别为0.740和0.749。单独使用这些蛋白质并不能改善对MACE的预测(AUC为0.758),但将这些蛋白质与SCORE2或10个TRFs结合使用,则能显著改善对MACE的预测(AUC=0.771,p结论:大规模血浆蛋白质组学通过数据驱动和基于文献的蛋白质筛选,可适度改善对未来 MACE 的预测,而非 TRFs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Large-scale plasma proteomics in the UK Biobank modestly improves prediction of major cardiovascular events in a population without previous cardiovascular disease.

Aims: Improved identification of individuals at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease would enable targeted interventions and potentially lead to reductions in mortality and morbidity. Our aim was to determine whether use of large-scale proteomics improves prediction of cardiovascular events beyond traditional risk factors (TRFs).

Methods and results: Using proximity extension assays, 2919 plasma proteins were measured in 38 380 participants of the UK Biobank. Both data- and literature-based feature selection and trained models using extreme gradient boosting machine learning were used to predict risk of major cardiovascular events (MACEs: fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary artery revascularization) during a 10-year follow-up. Area under the curve (AUC) and net reclassification index (NRI) were used to evaluate the additive value of selected protein panels to MACE prediction by Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2) or the 10 TRFs used in SCORE2. SCORE2 and SCORE2 refitted to UK Biobank data predicted MACE with AUCs of 0.740 and 0.749, respectively. Data-driven selection identified 114 proteins of greatest relevance for prediction. Prediction of MACE was not improved by using these proteins alone (AUC of 0.758) but was significantly improved by combining these proteins with SCORE2 or the 10 TRFs (AUC = 0.771, P < 001, NRI = 0.140, and AUC = 0.767, P = 0.03, NRI 0.053, respectively). Literature-based protein selection (113 proteins from five previous studies) also improved risk prediction beyond TRFs while a random selection of 114 proteins did not.

Conclusion: Large-scale plasma proteomics with data-driven and literature-based protein selection modestly improves prediction of future MACE beyond TRFs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of preventive cardiology
European journal of preventive cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
601
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (EJPC) is an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). The journal covers a wide range of scientific, clinical, and public health disciplines related to cardiovascular disease prevention, risk factor management, cardiovascular rehabilitation, population science and public health, and exercise physiology. The categories covered by the journal include classical risk factors and treatment, lifestyle risk factors, non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular conditions, concomitant pathological conditions, sport cardiology, diagnostic tests, care settings, epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacotherapy, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.
期刊最新文献
Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and clinical outcomes in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and diabetes: A population-based cohort study. Integrating epicardial fat and heart rate recovery in adults with metabolic risk factors. Nonobese young females with PCOS are at high risk for long-term cardiovascular disease. Unveiling the Gender Divide in Heart Failure Prognosis: New Insights from a Comprehensive Meta-Analysis. Closing the gap between WHO projections and actual need for cardiac rehabilitation in Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1