甲状腺结节特征描述中的多模态超声评估:理想的算法是什么?

Başak Erdemli Gürsel, Barış Çağlar, Rıfat Özpar, Özlem Saraydaroğlu, Gökhan Gökalp, Naile Bolca Topal
{"title":"甲状腺结节特征描述中的多模态超声评估:理想的算法是什么?","authors":"Başak Erdemli Gürsel, Barış Çağlar, Rıfat Özpar, Özlem Saraydaroğlu, Gökhan Gökalp, Naile Bolca Topal","doi":"10.11152/mu-4325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic performances of Ultrasonography (US), Shear-wave Elastography (SWE), and Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) findings in the diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules (MTNs) and to determine the US algorithm with the best diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Eighty-one nodules in 77 patients who had underwent multimodal US with biopsy results, were evaluated. Echogenicity, nodule components, contours, presence and type of calcification, and size were analyzed with US. Nodule stiffness and vascular index (VI) measurements were performed via SWE and SMI. The power of the US algorithm in predicting malignancy was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hypoechogenicity, irregular contour, aspect ratio (anteroposterior (AP)/transvers diameter) >1, and >43.9 kPa were the characteristicshad significant efficacy in the diagnosis of MTNs. Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values were respectively 100%, 48.5%, and 0.742 for hypoechogenicity; 80%, 90.1%, and 0.855 for irregular contour; 60%, 71.2%, and 0.656 for aspect ratio >1; 60%, 72.7%, and 0.671 for >43.9 kPa; and 93.3%, 90.9%, and 0.921 for the US algorithm. VI did not show significant efficacy in diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Some B-mode and SWE findings showed sufficient efficacy in differentiating benign and malign nodules on their own. However, diagnostic accuracy increased significantly when the US algorithm was applied.</p>","PeriodicalId":94138,"journal":{"name":"Medical ultrasonography","volume":"26 1","pages":"41-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multimodal ultrasonography evaluation in thyroid nodule characterization: what is the ideal algorithm?\",\"authors\":\"Başak Erdemli Gürsel, Barış Çağlar, Rıfat Özpar, Özlem Saraydaroğlu, Gökhan Gökalp, Naile Bolca Topal\",\"doi\":\"10.11152/mu-4325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic performances of Ultrasonography (US), Shear-wave Elastography (SWE), and Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) findings in the diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules (MTNs) and to determine the US algorithm with the best diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Eighty-one nodules in 77 patients who had underwent multimodal US with biopsy results, were evaluated. Echogenicity, nodule components, contours, presence and type of calcification, and size were analyzed with US. Nodule stiffness and vascular index (VI) measurements were performed via SWE and SMI. The power of the US algorithm in predicting malignancy was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hypoechogenicity, irregular contour, aspect ratio (anteroposterior (AP)/transvers diameter) >1, and >43.9 kPa were the characteristicshad significant efficacy in the diagnosis of MTNs. Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values were respectively 100%, 48.5%, and 0.742 for hypoechogenicity; 80%, 90.1%, and 0.855 for irregular contour; 60%, 71.2%, and 0.656 for aspect ratio >1; 60%, 72.7%, and 0.671 for >43.9 kPa; and 93.3%, 90.9%, and 0.921 for the US algorithm. VI did not show significant efficacy in diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Some B-mode and SWE findings showed sufficient efficacy in differentiating benign and malign nodules on their own. However, diagnostic accuracy increased significantly when the US algorithm was applied.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical ultrasonography\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"41-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical ultrasonography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11152/mu-4325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical ultrasonography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11152/mu-4325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨超声波(US)、剪切波弹性成像(SWE)和超微血管成像(SMI)结果在诊断恶性甲状腺结节(MTN)中的诊断性能,并确定诊断性能最佳的 US 算法:对77名接受过多模态US检查并有活检结果的患者的81个结节进行了评估。用超声波分析了结节的回声、结节成分、轮廓、钙化的存在和类型以及大小。通过 SWE 和 SMI 对结节硬度和血管指数 (VI) 进行了测量。对 US 算法预测恶性肿瘤的能力进行了评估:低糜烂性、轮廓不规则、纵横比(前胸(AP)/横径)>1 和 >43.9 kPa 是对 MTN 诊断有显著疗效的特征。低回声的敏感性、特异性和 AUC 值分别为 100%、48.5% 和 0.742;不规则轮廓的敏感性、特异性和 AUC 值分别为 80%、90.1% 和 0.855;纵横比 >1 的敏感性、特异性和 AUC 值分别为 60%、71.2% 和 0.656;>43.9 kPa 的敏感性、特异性和 AUC 值分别为 60%、72.7% 和 0.671;US 算法的敏感性、特异性和 AUC 值分别为 93.3%、90.9% 和 0.921。VI在诊断中没有显示出明显的疗效:结论:一些 B 型和 SWE 检查结果本身就足以区分良性和恶性结节。然而,应用 US 算法后,诊断准确率明显提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multimodal ultrasonography evaluation in thyroid nodule characterization: what is the ideal algorithm?

Aims: The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic performances of Ultrasonography (US), Shear-wave Elastography (SWE), and Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) findings in the diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules (MTNs) and to determine the US algorithm with the best diagnostic performance.

Material and methods: Eighty-one nodules in 77 patients who had underwent multimodal US with biopsy results, were evaluated. Echogenicity, nodule components, contours, presence and type of calcification, and size were analyzed with US. Nodule stiffness and vascular index (VI) measurements were performed via SWE and SMI. The power of the US algorithm in predicting malignancy was evaluated.

Results: Hypoechogenicity, irregular contour, aspect ratio (anteroposterior (AP)/transvers diameter) >1, and >43.9 kPa were the characteristicshad significant efficacy in the diagnosis of MTNs. Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values were respectively 100%, 48.5%, and 0.742 for hypoechogenicity; 80%, 90.1%, and 0.855 for irregular contour; 60%, 71.2%, and 0.656 for aspect ratio >1; 60%, 72.7%, and 0.671 for >43.9 kPa; and 93.3%, 90.9%, and 0.921 for the US algorithm. VI did not show significant efficacy in diagnosis.

Conclusion: Some B-mode and SWE findings showed sufficient efficacy in differentiating benign and malign nodules on their own. However, diagnostic accuracy increased significantly when the US algorithm was applied.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic accuracy of transcranial ultrasonography for detecting stenosis in patients with acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreatic cancer liver metastasis mimicking focal nodular hyperplasia. A case report. The impact of bowel preparation on MRI scans for confirming rectosigmoid endometriosis detected by transvaginal ultrasonography. Advancements and challenges in Shear-Wave Elastography of tendons: a comprehensive review. An [illustrative] update on pediatric emergency ultrasound: part 3 - cerebral, musculoskeletal and other applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1