利用 RS 和 GIS 以及改进的统计方法对锡金喜马拉雅山的滑坡易发性进行评估

IF 1.827 Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences Arabian Journal of Geosciences Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1007/s12517-024-11944-1
Kuldeep Dutta, Nishchal Wanjari, Anil Kumar Misra
{"title":"利用 RS 和 GIS 以及改进的统计方法对锡金喜马拉雅山的滑坡易发性进行评估","authors":"Kuldeep Dutta, Nishchal Wanjari, Anil Kumar Misra","doi":"10.1007/s12517-024-11944-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Landslide susceptibility zonation is a widely studied method for assessing the likelihood of landslides in specific areas. This study focuses on the Ranikhola watershed in the Sikkim Himalaya and utilizes the Frequency Ratio (FR) and Modified Information Value (MIV) methods to analyse landslide susceptibility. To enhance the susceptibility mapping a novel approach for the FR and MIV is introduced where the factor classes of higher importance were utilized. The study further evaluates a methodology that incorporates weighted ranking of landslide conditioning factor classes using FR and MIV indexes to generate landslide susceptibility maps (LSM). The landslide inventory comprises 124 landslides identified through satellite imagery from Q-GIS quick maps, ESRI base map, Google Earth, and Sentinel 2 A &amp; B. Sixteen conditioning factors are considered, including elevation, slope angle, aspect, curvature, drainage characteristics, vegetation index, geology, soil type, rainfall, road density, and land use. The LSI and LSM are derived from these factors. The LSM created using traditional FR and MIV methods show that 9.55% and 5.96% of the watershed area fall within the High Susceptibility Zone (HSZ) and Very High Susceptibility Zone (VHSZ), respectively. However, the novel approach reveals that 11.54% and 10.29% of the study area fall within the HSZ and VHSZ. The weighted ranking method indicates that 16.22% of the Ranikhola watershed area is within the HSZ and VHSZ. The models are evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with FR and MIV methods producing AUC values of 0.77 and 0.68, respectively. The new approach improves the AUC of the MIV method to 0.76, while the FR method remains relatively unchanged. The weighting method outperforms other FR and MIV methods, with an AUC of 0.90. Correlation analysis of the condition factors suggests that profile curvature, slope, stream power index, and topographic wetness index are the most influential factors, positively impacting each other and contributing to higher landslide susceptibility. The study emphasizes the importance of incorporating weighted ranking of landslide conditioning factor classes to create LSM, rather than relying on the total landslide susceptibility index (LSI) of factors. The findings provide valuable data for future large-scale investigations and efforts to enhance hazard preparedness in the Ranikhola watershed.</p>","PeriodicalId":476,"journal":{"name":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8270,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Landslide susceptibility assessment in sikkim himalaya with rs & gis, augmented by improved statistical methods\",\"authors\":\"Kuldeep Dutta, Nishchal Wanjari, Anil Kumar Misra\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12517-024-11944-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Landslide susceptibility zonation is a widely studied method for assessing the likelihood of landslides in specific areas. This study focuses on the Ranikhola watershed in the Sikkim Himalaya and utilizes the Frequency Ratio (FR) and Modified Information Value (MIV) methods to analyse landslide susceptibility. To enhance the susceptibility mapping a novel approach for the FR and MIV is introduced where the factor classes of higher importance were utilized. The study further evaluates a methodology that incorporates weighted ranking of landslide conditioning factor classes using FR and MIV indexes to generate landslide susceptibility maps (LSM). The landslide inventory comprises 124 landslides identified through satellite imagery from Q-GIS quick maps, ESRI base map, Google Earth, and Sentinel 2 A &amp; B. Sixteen conditioning factors are considered, including elevation, slope angle, aspect, curvature, drainage characteristics, vegetation index, geology, soil type, rainfall, road density, and land use. The LSI and LSM are derived from these factors. The LSM created using traditional FR and MIV methods show that 9.55% and 5.96% of the watershed area fall within the High Susceptibility Zone (HSZ) and Very High Susceptibility Zone (VHSZ), respectively. However, the novel approach reveals that 11.54% and 10.29% of the study area fall within the HSZ and VHSZ. The weighted ranking method indicates that 16.22% of the Ranikhola watershed area is within the HSZ and VHSZ. The models are evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with FR and MIV methods producing AUC values of 0.77 and 0.68, respectively. The new approach improves the AUC of the MIV method to 0.76, while the FR method remains relatively unchanged. The weighting method outperforms other FR and MIV methods, with an AUC of 0.90. Correlation analysis of the condition factors suggests that profile curvature, slope, stream power index, and topographic wetness index are the most influential factors, positively impacting each other and contributing to higher landslide susceptibility. The study emphasizes the importance of incorporating weighted ranking of landslide conditioning factor classes to create LSM, rather than relying on the total landslide susceptibility index (LSI) of factors. The findings provide valuable data for future large-scale investigations and efforts to enhance hazard preparedness in the Ranikhola watershed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arabian Journal of Geosciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8270,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arabian Journal of Geosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-024-11944-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-024-11944-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

滑坡易发性分区是一种广泛研究的方法,用于评估特定地区发生滑坡的可能性。本研究以锡金喜马拉雅山脉的拉尼霍拉流域为重点,利用频率比(FR)和修正信息值(MIV)方法分析滑坡易发性。为了增强易感性绘图,采用了一种新的频率比和修正信息值方法,其中利用了重要性较高的因子类别。该研究进一步评估了一种方法,该方法结合了使用 FR 和 MIV 指数对滑坡条件因子类别进行加权排序,以生成滑坡易感性图(LSM)。滑坡清单包括通过 Q-GIS 快速地图、ESRI 基础地图、Google 地球和 Sentinel 2 A & B 的卫星图像确定的 124 个滑坡点。LSI 和 LSM 均来自这些因素。使用传统的 FR 和 MIV 方法创建的 LSM 显示,分别有 9.55% 和 5.96% 的流域面积位于高易受影响区 (HSZ) 和极高易受影响区 (VHSZ)。然而,新方法显示,分别有 11.54% 和 10.29% 的研究区域位于高易发区(HSZ)和极高易发区(VHSZ)内。加权排序法表明,16.22% 的拉尼霍拉流域面积位于 HSZ 和 VHSZ 范围内。使用接收器运行特征曲线下面积(AUC)对模型进行评估,FR 和 MIV 方法产生的 AUC 值分别为 0.77 和 0.68。新方法将 MIV 方法的 AUC 提高到了 0.76,而 FR 方法则保持相对不变。加权法的 AUC 值为 0.90,优于其他 FR 和 MIV 方法。条件因子的相关性分析表明,剖面弯曲度、坡度、溪流动力指数和地形湿润指数是影响最大的因子,它们相互产生正向影响,并导致较高的滑坡易发性。该研究强调了结合滑坡条件因子类别的加权排序来创建 LSM 的重要性,而不是依赖于因子的总滑坡易感性指数 (LSI)。研究结果为今后在拉尼霍拉流域开展大规模调查和加强防灾工作提供了宝贵的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Landslide susceptibility assessment in sikkim himalaya with rs & gis, augmented by improved statistical methods

Landslide susceptibility zonation is a widely studied method for assessing the likelihood of landslides in specific areas. This study focuses on the Ranikhola watershed in the Sikkim Himalaya and utilizes the Frequency Ratio (FR) and Modified Information Value (MIV) methods to analyse landslide susceptibility. To enhance the susceptibility mapping a novel approach for the FR and MIV is introduced where the factor classes of higher importance were utilized. The study further evaluates a methodology that incorporates weighted ranking of landslide conditioning factor classes using FR and MIV indexes to generate landslide susceptibility maps (LSM). The landslide inventory comprises 124 landslides identified through satellite imagery from Q-GIS quick maps, ESRI base map, Google Earth, and Sentinel 2 A & B. Sixteen conditioning factors are considered, including elevation, slope angle, aspect, curvature, drainage characteristics, vegetation index, geology, soil type, rainfall, road density, and land use. The LSI and LSM are derived from these factors. The LSM created using traditional FR and MIV methods show that 9.55% and 5.96% of the watershed area fall within the High Susceptibility Zone (HSZ) and Very High Susceptibility Zone (VHSZ), respectively. However, the novel approach reveals that 11.54% and 10.29% of the study area fall within the HSZ and VHSZ. The weighted ranking method indicates that 16.22% of the Ranikhola watershed area is within the HSZ and VHSZ. The models are evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with FR and MIV methods producing AUC values of 0.77 and 0.68, respectively. The new approach improves the AUC of the MIV method to 0.76, while the FR method remains relatively unchanged. The weighting method outperforms other FR and MIV methods, with an AUC of 0.90. Correlation analysis of the condition factors suggests that profile curvature, slope, stream power index, and topographic wetness index are the most influential factors, positively impacting each other and contributing to higher landslide susceptibility. The study emphasizes the importance of incorporating weighted ranking of landslide conditioning factor classes to create LSM, rather than relying on the total landslide susceptibility index (LSI) of factors. The findings provide valuable data for future large-scale investigations and efforts to enhance hazard preparedness in the Ranikhola watershed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arabian Journal of Geosciences
Arabian Journal of Geosciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1587
审稿时长
6.7 months
期刊介绍: The Arabian Journal of Geosciences is the official journal of the Saudi Society for Geosciences and publishes peer-reviewed original and review articles on the entire range of Earth Science themes, focused on, but not limited to, those that have regional significance to the Middle East and the Euro-Mediterranean Zone. Key topics therefore include; geology, hydrogeology, earth system science, petroleum sciences, geophysics, seismology and crustal structures, tectonics, sedimentology, palaeontology, metamorphic and igneous petrology, natural hazards, environmental sciences and sustainable development, geoarchaeology, geomorphology, paleo-environment studies, oceanography, atmospheric sciences, GIS and remote sensing, geodesy, mineralogy, volcanology, geochemistry and metallogenesis.
期刊最新文献
Construction of multi-purpose geophysical test site on a lateritic clay soil Impact of stained- and cemented-type sandstone natural fractures on stress-weathered cracking behavior Mineralogical, geochemical, and spectral characteristics of low-high grade bauxite deposits of the southern bauxite zone at Al Ba’itha mine, Az Zabirah, Saudi Arabia Reservoir recovery study with stability analysis model constructed by water-driven oil flat sand filling experiment: example of well area X in Tankou oilfield, China Geotechnical characterisation and 2D soil cross-section model development in the Kashmir Basin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1