单种群和多种群回放在混合种群雏鸟、山雀和黄雀群中引起不对称反应

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Ethology Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1111/eth.13459
Heather J. B. Brooks, Todd M. Freeberg
{"title":"单种群和多种群回放在混合种群雏鸟、山雀和黄雀群中引起不对称反应","authors":"Heather J. B. Brooks,&nbsp;Todd M. Freeberg","doi":"10.1111/eth.13459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Individuals join mixed-species groups to gain benefits such as improved foraging and predator detection. Birds in the family Paridae often drive mixed-species flocking in North America, and these species can act as community informants for forest-wide eavesdropping networks. Although we know a great deal about how this communication functions in anti-predator contexts, less is known about how the vocalizations of members of these flocks may affect the foraging behavior of potential flockmates. In this study, we presented naturally occurring mixed-species flocks of chickadees, titmice, and nuthatches with one of four playback conditions: chickadee-only calls, nuthatch-only calls, calls of both species, and a silent control. We hypothesized that the flocks would be most responsive to playbacks that contained calls from more than one species. We also tested an alternative hypothesis that predicted that birds would be most responsive to the nuclear species within the flock (chickadees). We found that birds were more likely to arrive, and arrived more quickly, for the playbacks with calls from both species compared to playbacks of nuthatches alone or the silent control. Playbacks of chickadee calls alone attracted an intermediate number of birds, which did not differ significantly from the mixed-species flock condition, or the nuthatch call alone condition. Our hypotheses were not supported due to the lack of significant difference between the mixed-species playbacks and the chickadee playbacks. However, our findings do indicate that different species in these flocks can react differently to the calls of members of these flocks and that future studies may continue to find asymmetries in attraction to these different social signals.</p>","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-species and multi-species playbacks elicit asymmetrical responses within mixed-species chickadee, titmouse, and nuthatch flocks\",\"authors\":\"Heather J. B. Brooks,&nbsp;Todd M. Freeberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eth.13459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Individuals join mixed-species groups to gain benefits such as improved foraging and predator detection. Birds in the family Paridae often drive mixed-species flocking in North America, and these species can act as community informants for forest-wide eavesdropping networks. Although we know a great deal about how this communication functions in anti-predator contexts, less is known about how the vocalizations of members of these flocks may affect the foraging behavior of potential flockmates. In this study, we presented naturally occurring mixed-species flocks of chickadees, titmice, and nuthatches with one of four playback conditions: chickadee-only calls, nuthatch-only calls, calls of both species, and a silent control. We hypothesized that the flocks would be most responsive to playbacks that contained calls from more than one species. We also tested an alternative hypothesis that predicted that birds would be most responsive to the nuclear species within the flock (chickadees). We found that birds were more likely to arrive, and arrived more quickly, for the playbacks with calls from both species compared to playbacks of nuthatches alone or the silent control. Playbacks of chickadee calls alone attracted an intermediate number of birds, which did not differ significantly from the mixed-species flock condition, or the nuthatch call alone condition. Our hypotheses were not supported due to the lack of significant difference between the mixed-species playbacks and the chickadee playbacks. However, our findings do indicate that different species in these flocks can react differently to the calls of members of these flocks and that future studies may continue to find asymmetries in attraction to these different social signals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eth.13459\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eth.13459","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

个体加入混群物种群体可获得好处,如改善觅食和捕食者探测能力。在北美洲,鹦科鸟类经常推动混群,这些物种可以充当整个森林窃听网络的群落信息员。尽管我们对这种交流如何在反捕食者环境中发挥作用有很多了解,但对这些鸟群成员的发声如何影响潜在群友的觅食行为却知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们为自然发生的鸡鸦、山雀和黄雀混合种群提供了四种播放条件之一:仅鸡鸦的叫声、仅黄雀的叫声、鸡鸦和黄雀的叫声以及无声对照。我们假设,鸟群对包含一种以上鸟类叫声的重放反应最为强烈。我们还测试了另一种假设,即预测鸟类对鸟群中的核心物种(秧鸡)反应最灵敏。我们发现,与只播放黄雀的叫声或无声对照组相比,播放两种鸟类叫声的鸟群更容易到达,而且到达的速度更快。单独播放秧鸡叫声吸引的鸟类数量居中,与混合物种鸟群条件或单独播放黄雀叫声条件的鸟类数量差异不大。由于混合物种播放与雏鸟播放之间没有显著差异,我们的假设没有得到支持。然而,我们的研究结果确实表明,这些鸟群中的不同物种会对这些鸟群成员的叫声做出不同的反应,未来的研究可能会继续发现这些不同社会信号的吸引力不对称。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Single-species and multi-species playbacks elicit asymmetrical responses within mixed-species chickadee, titmouse, and nuthatch flocks

Individuals join mixed-species groups to gain benefits such as improved foraging and predator detection. Birds in the family Paridae often drive mixed-species flocking in North America, and these species can act as community informants for forest-wide eavesdropping networks. Although we know a great deal about how this communication functions in anti-predator contexts, less is known about how the vocalizations of members of these flocks may affect the foraging behavior of potential flockmates. In this study, we presented naturally occurring mixed-species flocks of chickadees, titmice, and nuthatches with one of four playback conditions: chickadee-only calls, nuthatch-only calls, calls of both species, and a silent control. We hypothesized that the flocks would be most responsive to playbacks that contained calls from more than one species. We also tested an alternative hypothesis that predicted that birds would be most responsive to the nuclear species within the flock (chickadees). We found that birds were more likely to arrive, and arrived more quickly, for the playbacks with calls from both species compared to playbacks of nuthatches alone or the silent control. Playbacks of chickadee calls alone attracted an intermediate number of birds, which did not differ significantly from the mixed-species flock condition, or the nuthatch call alone condition. Our hypotheses were not supported due to the lack of significant difference between the mixed-species playbacks and the chickadee playbacks. However, our findings do indicate that different species in these flocks can react differently to the calls of members of these flocks and that future studies may continue to find asymmetries in attraction to these different social signals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethology
Ethology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
89
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International in scope, Ethology publishes original research on behaviour including physiological mechanisms, function, and evolution. The Journal addresses behaviour in all species, from slime moulds to humans. Experimental research is preferred, both from the field and the lab, which is grounded in a theoretical framework. The section ''Perspectives and Current Debates'' provides an overview of the field and may include theoretical investigations and essays on controversial topics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Male and female age affects the reproductive potential of two tephritid flies Intra‐individual modulations and inter‐individual variations of female signals in the domestic canary (Serinus canaria) Polistes dominula spatial learning abilities while foraging Male–female chemical interactions in a facultatively parthenogenetic stick insect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1