肥胖对腹腔镜肝脏切除术后短期疗效的影响:单一机构的经验

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques Pub Date : 2023-12-29 DOI:10.5114/wiitm.2023.134104
Tajda Španring, Špela Turk, Irena Plahuta, Tomislav Magdalenić, Kevin Laufer, Aleks Brumec, Stojan Potrč, Arpad Ivanecz
{"title":"肥胖对腹腔镜肝脏切除术后短期疗效的影响:单一机构的经验","authors":"Tajda Španring, Špela Turk, Irena Plahuta, Tomislav Magdalenić, Kevin Laufer, Aleks Brumec, Stojan Potrč, Arpad Ivanecz","doi":"10.5114/wiitm.2023.134104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Introduction</b><br/>Obesity is a major public health problem and a well-known cause of multiple comorbidities. With the increasing application of minimally invasive surgery for benign and malignant liver lesions, the results of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in obese patients are of great interest.<br/><br/><b>Aim</b><br/>To evaluate the short-term operative outcomes after LLR in obese patients and compare them to patients with normal weight and overweight.<br/><br/><b>Material and methods</b><br/>All 235 consecutive patients undergoing LLR from 2008 to 2023 were retrospectively analysed. Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on their body mass index (BMI): normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25–29.9 kg/m2), and obese (≥ 30 kg/m2). The groups were then compared regarding preoperative data and intra- and postoperative outcomes.<br/><br/><b>Results</b><br/>Despite higher ASA score and associated comorbidities in the obese group, there were no significant differences in intraoperative complication (blood loss, damage to surrounding structures, conversion rate) between BMI groups (20.8% vs. 16.8% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.619). There were no significant differences in overall morbidity (34.7% vs. 27.7% vs. 29.5%, p = 0.582), as well as major morbidity (15.9% vs. 11.8% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.784) or mortality rates (1.4% vs. 1.7% vs. 0.0%, p = 1.000). Univariate logistic regression did not show BMI or obesity as a predictive variable for intraoperative complication.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions</b><br/>Obesity is not a significant, strong risk factor for worse short-term outcomes, and LLR may be considered also in patients with overweight and obesity.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":49361,"journal":{"name":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","volume":"234 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of obesity on short-term outcomes after the laparoscopic liver resection: a single-institution experience\",\"authors\":\"Tajda Španring, Špela Turk, Irena Plahuta, Tomislav Magdalenić, Kevin Laufer, Aleks Brumec, Stojan Potrč, Arpad Ivanecz\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/wiitm.2023.134104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<b>Introduction</b><br/>Obesity is a major public health problem and a well-known cause of multiple comorbidities. With the increasing application of minimally invasive surgery for benign and malignant liver lesions, the results of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in obese patients are of great interest.<br/><br/><b>Aim</b><br/>To evaluate the short-term operative outcomes after LLR in obese patients and compare them to patients with normal weight and overweight.<br/><br/><b>Material and methods</b><br/>All 235 consecutive patients undergoing LLR from 2008 to 2023 were retrospectively analysed. Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on their body mass index (BMI): normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25–29.9 kg/m2), and obese (≥ 30 kg/m2). The groups were then compared regarding preoperative data and intra- and postoperative outcomes.<br/><br/><b>Results</b><br/>Despite higher ASA score and associated comorbidities in the obese group, there were no significant differences in intraoperative complication (blood loss, damage to surrounding structures, conversion rate) between BMI groups (20.8% vs. 16.8% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.619). There were no significant differences in overall morbidity (34.7% vs. 27.7% vs. 29.5%, p = 0.582), as well as major morbidity (15.9% vs. 11.8% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.784) or mortality rates (1.4% vs. 1.7% vs. 0.0%, p = 1.000). Univariate logistic regression did not show BMI or obesity as a predictive variable for intraoperative complication.<br/><br/><b>Conclusions</b><br/>Obesity is not a significant, strong risk factor for worse short-term outcomes, and LLR may be considered also in patients with overweight and obesity.<br/><br/>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques\",\"volume\":\"234 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2023.134104\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2023.134104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言肥胖是一个主要的公共健康问题,也是众所周知的多种并发症的诱因。目的 评估肥胖患者腹腔镜肝切除术后的短期手术效果,并与体重正常和超重患者进行比较。材料和方法 回顾性分析2008年至2023年期间接受腹腔镜肝切除术的235例连续患者。根据体重指数(BMI)将患者分为三组:正常体重(18.5-24.9 kg/m2)、超重(25-29.9 kg/m2)和肥胖(≥ 30 kg/m2)。结果尽管肥胖组的 ASA 评分和相关合并症较高,但 BMI 组之间在术中并发症(失血、周围结构损伤、转归率)方面没有显著差异(20.8% vs. 16.8% vs. 22.7%,P = 0.619)。总发病率(34.7% vs. 27.7% vs. 29.5%,P = 0.582)、主要发病率(15.9% vs. 11.8% vs. 11.4%,P = 0.784)和死亡率(1.4% vs. 1.7% vs. 0.0%,P = 1.000)均无明显差异。单变量逻辑回归并未显示 BMI 或肥胖是术中并发症的预测变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of obesity on short-term outcomes after the laparoscopic liver resection: a single-institution experience
Introduction
Obesity is a major public health problem and a well-known cause of multiple comorbidities. With the increasing application of minimally invasive surgery for benign and malignant liver lesions, the results of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in obese patients are of great interest.

Aim
To evaluate the short-term operative outcomes after LLR in obese patients and compare them to patients with normal weight and overweight.

Material and methods
All 235 consecutive patients undergoing LLR from 2008 to 2023 were retrospectively analysed. Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on their body mass index (BMI): normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25–29.9 kg/m2), and obese (≥ 30 kg/m2). The groups were then compared regarding preoperative data and intra- and postoperative outcomes.

Results
Despite higher ASA score and associated comorbidities in the obese group, there were no significant differences in intraoperative complication (blood loss, damage to surrounding structures, conversion rate) between BMI groups (20.8% vs. 16.8% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.619). There were no significant differences in overall morbidity (34.7% vs. 27.7% vs. 29.5%, p = 0.582), as well as major morbidity (15.9% vs. 11.8% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.784) or mortality rates (1.4% vs. 1.7% vs. 0.0%, p = 1.000). Univariate logistic regression did not show BMI or obesity as a predictive variable for intraoperative complication.

Conclusions
Obesity is not a significant, strong risk factor for worse short-term outcomes, and LLR may be considered also in patients with overweight and obesity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
23.50%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques serves as a forum for exchange of multidisciplinary experiences in fields such as: surgery, gynaecology, urology, gastroenterology, neurosurgery, ENT surgery, cardiac surgery, anaesthesiology and radiology, as well as other branches of medicine dealing with miniinvasive techniques.
期刊最新文献
Early-stage voiding function following uni- versus bilateral inferior vesical vessel resection during therapeutic lateral lymph node dissection with autonomic nerve sparing for advanced low rectal cancer (with video) Effect and prognosis of endoscopic intracranial hematoma removal and hematoma puncture and drainage in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for pulmonary metastasis: who benefits the most? Meta-analysis of clinical efficacy and safety of transanal endoscopic microsurgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of rectal tumors Clinical comparative study of laparoscopic partial splenectomy and open partial splenectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1