患者对在全科医生处接受糖尿病年度复查和足部评估的障碍的看法:一项定性研究。

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Journal of primary health care Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1071/HC23081
William Ju, Ibrahim S Al-Busaidi, Helen Lunt, Ben Hudson
{"title":"患者对在全科医生处接受糖尿病年度复查和足部评估的障碍的看法:一项定性研究。","authors":"William Ju, Ibrahim S Al-Busaidi, Helen Lunt, Ben Hudson","doi":"10.1071/HC23081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Regular diabetic foot checks, at least annually, are important for early identification of risk factors and prevention of ulceration and amputation. To ensure this, most general practices in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) offer free annual diabetes reviews (ADRs) which include a comprehensive foot evaluation. However, attendance rates at these ADRs are low. Aim To explore patients' perspectives on the barriers to attending ADRs and foot checks. Methods Semi-structured interviews with people with type 2 diabetes who were overdue their ADR (n  = 13; 7 women, 6 Māori) from two urban practices were conducted. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim and then analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. Results We identified three key themes demonstrating barriers to attendance: healthcare-associated factors (suboptimal clinician-patient relationship, not having a consistent general practitioner (GP)); patient-related factors (co-morbid health conditions, issues surrounding identity, and logistical issues); and systemic factors (COVID-19 pandemic, travel distance to the practice, unawareness of available foot care services). Participants' feedback focused on patient-centred approaches for improvements to service delivery, for example using online educational materials, and utilising culturally appropriate models of health including Te Whare Tapa Whā and Whānau Ora approach. Discussion We identified several barriers to attendance, some of which are potentially modifiable. Addressing modifiable barriers and incorporating suggestions made by participants may improve access to the ADR and reduce non-attendance. Further participatory action research could explore these insights in ways that facilitate tino rangatiratanga (self-determination) and palpable action.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"16 1","pages":"53-60"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient perceptions of barriers to attending annual diabetes review and foot assessment in general practice: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"William Ju, Ibrahim S Al-Busaidi, Helen Lunt, Ben Hudson\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/HC23081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Introduction Regular diabetic foot checks, at least annually, are important for early identification of risk factors and prevention of ulceration and amputation. To ensure this, most general practices in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) offer free annual diabetes reviews (ADRs) which include a comprehensive foot evaluation. However, attendance rates at these ADRs are low. Aim To explore patients' perspectives on the barriers to attending ADRs and foot checks. Methods Semi-structured interviews with people with type 2 diabetes who were overdue their ADR (n  = 13; 7 women, 6 Māori) from two urban practices were conducted. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim and then analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. Results We identified three key themes demonstrating barriers to attendance: healthcare-associated factors (suboptimal clinician-patient relationship, not having a consistent general practitioner (GP)); patient-related factors (co-morbid health conditions, issues surrounding identity, and logistical issues); and systemic factors (COVID-19 pandemic, travel distance to the practice, unawareness of available foot care services). Participants' feedback focused on patient-centred approaches for improvements to service delivery, for example using online educational materials, and utilising culturally appropriate models of health including Te Whare Tapa Whā and Whānau Ora approach. Discussion We identified several barriers to attendance, some of which are potentially modifiable. Addressing modifiable barriers and incorporating suggestions made by participants may improve access to the ADR and reduce non-attendance. Further participatory action research could explore these insights in ways that facilitate tino rangatiratanga (self-determination) and palpable action.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of primary health care\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"53-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of primary health care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC23081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of primary health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC23081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:定期检查糖尿病足(至少每年一次)对于早期识别风险因素、预防溃疡和截肢非常重要。为确保做到这一点,新西兰奥特亚罗瓦(Aotearoa New Zealand,NZ)的大多数普通诊所都提供免费的糖尿病年度复查(ADRs),其中包括全面的足部评估。然而,这些年度糖尿病评估的出席率却很低。目的 探讨患者对参加年度糖尿病复查和足部检查的障碍的看法。方法 对两个城市诊所中逾期未进行 ADR 的 2 型糖尿病患者(n = 13;7 位女性,6 位毛利人)进行了半结构式访谈。对访谈进行了录音和逐字记录,然后采用归纳式主题分析方法进行了分析。结果 我们发现了三个关键主题,它们显示了就诊障碍:医疗保健相关因素(不理想的医患关系、没有固定的全科医生(GP));患者相关因素(并发症、身份问题和后勤问题);以及系统性因素(COVID-19 大流行、到诊所的路途遥远、不了解可用的足部护理服务)。参与者的反馈意见主要集中在以患者为中心的服务提供改进方法上,例如使用在线教育材料,以及利用文化适宜的健康模式,包括 Te Whare Tapa Whā 和 Whānau Ora 方法。讨论 我们发现了一些参加培训的障碍,其中一些可能是可以改变的。解决可改变的障碍并采纳参与者提出的建议,可能会提高参加 ADR 的机会并减少不参加的人数。进一步的参与式行动研究可以通过促进 "tino rangatiratanga"(自决)和可感知行动的方式来探索这些见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient perceptions of barriers to attending annual diabetes review and foot assessment in general practice: a qualitative study.

Introduction Regular diabetic foot checks, at least annually, are important for early identification of risk factors and prevention of ulceration and amputation. To ensure this, most general practices in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) offer free annual diabetes reviews (ADRs) which include a comprehensive foot evaluation. However, attendance rates at these ADRs are low. Aim To explore patients' perspectives on the barriers to attending ADRs and foot checks. Methods Semi-structured interviews with people with type 2 diabetes who were overdue their ADR (n  = 13; 7 women, 6 Māori) from two urban practices were conducted. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim and then analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. Results We identified three key themes demonstrating barriers to attendance: healthcare-associated factors (suboptimal clinician-patient relationship, not having a consistent general practitioner (GP)); patient-related factors (co-morbid health conditions, issues surrounding identity, and logistical issues); and systemic factors (COVID-19 pandemic, travel distance to the practice, unawareness of available foot care services). Participants' feedback focused on patient-centred approaches for improvements to service delivery, for example using online educational materials, and utilising culturally appropriate models of health including Te Whare Tapa Whā and Whānau Ora approach. Discussion We identified several barriers to attendance, some of which are potentially modifiable. Addressing modifiable barriers and incorporating suggestions made by participants may improve access to the ADR and reduce non-attendance. Further participatory action research could explore these insights in ways that facilitate tino rangatiratanga (self-determination) and palpable action.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of primary health care
Journal of primary health care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
79
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Does exercise benefit people with osteoarthritis of the knee? Community pharmacy service provision to adults with palliative care needs in their last year of life: a scoping review. Contribution of the community pharmacist workforce to primary care through the lens of medicines classification: comparison of Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia. Conventional medication adherence and self-treatment practices among South Asian immigrants: a qualitative study. Managing medicines-related continuity of care: the views of a range of prescribers in New Zealand general practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1