增强现实技术改善小儿面罩诱导:一项前瞻性、匹配病例对照研究

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2024-03-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735241241146
Romy Yun, Emily M He, Michelle Zuniga, Nan Guo, Ellen Y Wang, Florence Ho, Molly Pearson, Samuel T Rodriguez, Thomas J Caruso
{"title":"增强现实技术改善小儿面罩诱导:一项前瞻性、匹配病例对照研究","authors":"Romy Yun, Emily M He, Michelle Zuniga, Nan Guo, Ellen Y Wang, Florence Ho, Molly Pearson, Samuel T Rodriguez, Thomas J Caruso","doi":"10.1177/23743735241241146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Pediatric perioperative anxiety is a significant problem during mask induction for general anesthesia. Immersive technologies, such as extended reality headsets, are a promising strategy for alleviating anxiety. Our primary aim was to investigate mask acceptance during inhalational induction utilizing augmented reality (AR). <b>Methods:</b> This was a prospective, matched case-control study at a quaternary academic hospital. Fifty pediatric patients using AR for mask induction were matched to 150 standard-of-care (SOC) controls. The primary outcome was measured with the Mask Acceptance Scale (MAS). Secondary outcomes of cooperation and emergent delirium (ED) were assessed. <b>Results:</b> MAS scores ≥2 occurred at 4% (95% CI [0, 9.4%]) with AR versus 19.3%, (95% CI [13%, 25.7%]) with SOC (RR 0.21, 95% CI [0.05, 0.84], <i>P</i> = .027). Ninety-eight percent of AR patients were cooperative versus 91.3% with SOC (<i>P</i> = .457). Zero percent had ED with AR versus 0.7% with SOC (<i>P</i> = 1.000). <b>Conclusions:</b> AR during mask induction improved mask acceptance compared to SOC. No relationship was observed between AR and cooperation or ED. Future research will investigate the integration of AR into clinical practice as a nonpharmacologic intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"11 ","pages":"23743735241241146"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10976515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Augmented Reality Improves Pediatric Mask Induction: A Prospective, Matched Case-Control Study.\",\"authors\":\"Romy Yun, Emily M He, Michelle Zuniga, Nan Guo, Ellen Y Wang, Florence Ho, Molly Pearson, Samuel T Rodriguez, Thomas J Caruso\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23743735241241146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Pediatric perioperative anxiety is a significant problem during mask induction for general anesthesia. Immersive technologies, such as extended reality headsets, are a promising strategy for alleviating anxiety. Our primary aim was to investigate mask acceptance during inhalational induction utilizing augmented reality (AR). <b>Methods:</b> This was a prospective, matched case-control study at a quaternary academic hospital. Fifty pediatric patients using AR for mask induction were matched to 150 standard-of-care (SOC) controls. The primary outcome was measured with the Mask Acceptance Scale (MAS). Secondary outcomes of cooperation and emergent delirium (ED) were assessed. <b>Results:</b> MAS scores ≥2 occurred at 4% (95% CI [0, 9.4%]) with AR versus 19.3%, (95% CI [13%, 25.7%]) with SOC (RR 0.21, 95% CI [0.05, 0.84], <i>P</i> = .027). Ninety-eight percent of AR patients were cooperative versus 91.3% with SOC (<i>P</i> = .457). Zero percent had ED with AR versus 0.7% with SOC (<i>P</i> = 1.000). <b>Conclusions:</b> AR during mask induction improved mask acceptance compared to SOC. No relationship was observed between AR and cooperation or ED. Future research will investigate the integration of AR into clinical practice as a nonpharmacologic intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient Experience\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"23743735241241146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10976515/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient Experience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735241241146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735241241146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:小儿围手术期焦虑是面罩诱导全身麻醉期间的一个重要问题。沉浸式技术(如扩展现实耳机)是缓解焦虑的有效方法。我们的主要目的是研究利用增强现实技术(AR)进行吸入诱导时对面罩的接受程度。方法:这是一项在一家四级学术医院进行的前瞻性、匹配病例对照研究。50 名使用增强现实技术进行面罩诱导的儿科患者与 150 名标准护理 (SOC) 对照组进行了配对。主要结果采用喉罩接受量表(MAS)进行测量。评估的次要结果是合作性和突发谵妄 (ED)。结果显示MAS评分≥2的AR患者为4%(95% CI [0,9.4%]),而SOC患者为19.3%(95% CI [13%,25.7%])(RR为0.21,95% CI [0.05,0.84],P = 0.027)。98%的 AR 患者合作,而 91.3% 的 SOC 患者合作(P = .457)。AR患者的ED发生率为0%,而SOC患者的ED发生率为0.7%(P = 1.000)。结论:与 SOC 相比,在喉罩诱导期间使用 AR 可提高喉罩接受度。没有观察到 AR 与合作或 ED 之间的关系。未来的研究将把 AR 作为一种非药物干预措施纳入临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Augmented Reality Improves Pediatric Mask Induction: A Prospective, Matched Case-Control Study.

Introduction: Pediatric perioperative anxiety is a significant problem during mask induction for general anesthesia. Immersive technologies, such as extended reality headsets, are a promising strategy for alleviating anxiety. Our primary aim was to investigate mask acceptance during inhalational induction utilizing augmented reality (AR). Methods: This was a prospective, matched case-control study at a quaternary academic hospital. Fifty pediatric patients using AR for mask induction were matched to 150 standard-of-care (SOC) controls. The primary outcome was measured with the Mask Acceptance Scale (MAS). Secondary outcomes of cooperation and emergent delirium (ED) were assessed. Results: MAS scores ≥2 occurred at 4% (95% CI [0, 9.4%]) with AR versus 19.3%, (95% CI [13%, 25.7%]) with SOC (RR 0.21, 95% CI [0.05, 0.84], P = .027). Ninety-eight percent of AR patients were cooperative versus 91.3% with SOC (P = .457). Zero percent had ED with AR versus 0.7% with SOC (P = 1.000). Conclusions: AR during mask induction improved mask acceptance compared to SOC. No relationship was observed between AR and cooperation or ED. Future research will investigate the integration of AR into clinical practice as a nonpharmacologic intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
"It was not normal, and I had to find a doctor and tell him." Kenyan Women's Response to Cervical Cancer Symptoms. Factors Associated With Psychiatry Consultation for Musculoskeletal Trauma Patients. Does an "EZ" Survey Improve the Data Quality of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Clinician and Group Survey 3.1? An Adaptive Pacing Intervention for Adults Living With Long COVID: A Narrative Study of Patient Experiences of Using the PaceMe app. Behind the Scenes of Isotretinoin: My Journey and Recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1