先天性子宫畸形对产科和围产期结果的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.7 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.52054/FVVO.16.1.004
M Caballero Campo, F Pérez Milán, M Carrera Roig, E Moratalla Bartolomé, J A Domínguez Arroyo, J L Alcázar Zambrano, L Alonso Pacheco, J Carugno
{"title":"先天性子宫畸形对产科和围产期结果的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"M Caballero Campo, F Pérez Milán, M Carrera Roig, E Moratalla Bartolomé, J A Domínguez Arroyo, J L Alcázar Zambrano, L Alonso Pacheco, J Carugno","doi":"10.52054/FVVO.16.1.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Congenital uterine anomalies (CUA) can be associated with impairments of early and late pregnancy events.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of CUA on reproductive outcomes in pregnancies conceived spontaneously or after assisted reproduction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies comparing patients with CUA versus women with normal uterus. A structured literature search was performed in leading scientific databases to identify prospective and retrospective studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale, adapted to AHRQ standards, was used to assess the risk of bias. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated. Publication bias and statistical heterogeneity were assessed, and meta-regression was used to analyse the heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, placental abruption, term, and premature rupture of membranes (PROM), malpresentation at delivery, preterm delivery prior to 37, 34 and 32 weeks, caesarean delivery, intrauterine growth restriction/small for gestational age, foetal mortality and perinatal mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>32 studies were included. CUAs increased significantly the risk of first/second trimester miscarriage (OR:1.54;95%CI:1.14-2.07), placental abruption (OR:5.04;3.60-7.04), PROM (OR:1.71;1.34-2.18), foetal malpresentation at delivery (OR:21.04;10.95-40.44), preterm birth (adjusted OR:4.34;3.59-5.21), a caesarean delivery (adjusted OR:7.69;4.17-14.29), intrauterine growth restriction/small for gestational age (adjusted OR:50;6.11-424), foetal mortality (OR:2.07;1.56-2.73) and perinatal mortality (OR:3.28;2.01-5.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CUA increases the risk of complications during pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum. Complications most frequent in CUA patients were preterm delivery, foetal malpresentation, and caesarean delivery.</p><p><strong>What is new?: </strong>Bicornuate uterus was associated with the highest number of adverse outcomes, followed by didelphys, subseptate and septate uterus.</p>","PeriodicalId":46400,"journal":{"name":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","volume":"16 1","pages":"9-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11198883/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of congenital uterine anomalies on obstetric and perinatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"M Caballero Campo, F Pérez Milán, M Carrera Roig, E Moratalla Bartolomé, J A Domínguez Arroyo, J L Alcázar Zambrano, L Alonso Pacheco, J Carugno\",\"doi\":\"10.52054/FVVO.16.1.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Congenital uterine anomalies (CUA) can be associated with impairments of early and late pregnancy events.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of CUA on reproductive outcomes in pregnancies conceived spontaneously or after assisted reproduction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies comparing patients with CUA versus women with normal uterus. A structured literature search was performed in leading scientific databases to identify prospective and retrospective studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale, adapted to AHRQ standards, was used to assess the risk of bias. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated. Publication bias and statistical heterogeneity were assessed, and meta-regression was used to analyse the heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, placental abruption, term, and premature rupture of membranes (PROM), malpresentation at delivery, preterm delivery prior to 37, 34 and 32 weeks, caesarean delivery, intrauterine growth restriction/small for gestational age, foetal mortality and perinatal mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>32 studies were included. CUAs increased significantly the risk of first/second trimester miscarriage (OR:1.54;95%CI:1.14-2.07), placental abruption (OR:5.04;3.60-7.04), PROM (OR:1.71;1.34-2.18), foetal malpresentation at delivery (OR:21.04;10.95-40.44), preterm birth (adjusted OR:4.34;3.59-5.21), a caesarean delivery (adjusted OR:7.69;4.17-14.29), intrauterine growth restriction/small for gestational age (adjusted OR:50;6.11-424), foetal mortality (OR:2.07;1.56-2.73) and perinatal mortality (OR:3.28;2.01-5.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CUA increases the risk of complications during pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum. Complications most frequent in CUA patients were preterm delivery, foetal malpresentation, and caesarean delivery.</p><p><strong>What is new?: </strong>Bicornuate uterus was associated with the highest number of adverse outcomes, followed by didelphys, subseptate and septate uterus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"9-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11198883/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.16.1.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.16.1.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:先天性子宫异常(CUA先天性子宫畸形(CUA)可能与早期和晚期妊娠事件的损害有关:评估先天性子宫畸形对自然受孕或辅助生殖后妊娠的生殖结局的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析比较了CUA患者与正常子宫妇女的队列研究。在主要科学数据库中进行了结构化文献检索,以确定前瞻性和回顾性研究。根据 AHRQ 标准改编的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表用于评估偏倚风险。计算汇总的几率比(OR)。评估发表偏倚和统计异质性,并使用元回归分析异质性:流产、宫外孕、胎盘早剥、足月、胎膜早破(PROM)、分娩时胎位不正、37周、34周和32周前早产、剖宫产、宫内发育受限/小于胎龄、胎儿死亡率和围产儿死亡率:共纳入 32 项研究。CUAs明显增加了第一/第二孕期流产(OR:1.54;95%CI:1.14-2.07)、胎盘早剥(OR:5.04;3.60-7.04)、PROM(OR:1.71;1.34-2.18)、分娩时胎位不正(OR:21.04;10.95-40.44)、早产(调整后的OR:4.34;3.59-5.21)、剖腹产(调整 OR:7.69;4.17-14.29)、宫内生长受限/胎龄过小(调整 OR:50;6.11-424)、胎儿死亡(OR:2.07;1.56-2.73)和围产期死亡(OR:3.28;2.01-5.36):结论:CUA会增加妊娠、分娩和产后并发症的风险。结论:CUA 增加了妊娠、分娩和产后并发症的风险,CUA 患者最常见的并发症是早产、胎位不正和剖腹产:双角子宫导致的不良后果最多,其次是双角子宫、隔膜下子宫和隔膜子宫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of congenital uterine anomalies on obstetric and perinatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Congenital uterine anomalies (CUA) can be associated with impairments of early and late pregnancy events.

Objective: To assess the impact of CUA on reproductive outcomes in pregnancies conceived spontaneously or after assisted reproduction.

Materials and methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies comparing patients with CUA versus women with normal uterus. A structured literature search was performed in leading scientific databases to identify prospective and retrospective studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale, adapted to AHRQ standards, was used to assess the risk of bias. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated. Publication bias and statistical heterogeneity were assessed, and meta-regression was used to analyse the heterogeneity.

Main outcome measures: Miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, placental abruption, term, and premature rupture of membranes (PROM), malpresentation at delivery, preterm delivery prior to 37, 34 and 32 weeks, caesarean delivery, intrauterine growth restriction/small for gestational age, foetal mortality and perinatal mortality.

Results: 32 studies were included. CUAs increased significantly the risk of first/second trimester miscarriage (OR:1.54;95%CI:1.14-2.07), placental abruption (OR:5.04;3.60-7.04), PROM (OR:1.71;1.34-2.18), foetal malpresentation at delivery (OR:21.04;10.95-40.44), preterm birth (adjusted OR:4.34;3.59-5.21), a caesarean delivery (adjusted OR:7.69;4.17-14.29), intrauterine growth restriction/small for gestational age (adjusted OR:50;6.11-424), foetal mortality (OR:2.07;1.56-2.73) and perinatal mortality (OR:3.28;2.01-5.36).

Conclusions: CUA increases the risk of complications during pregnancy, delivery, and postpartum. Complications most frequent in CUA patients were preterm delivery, foetal malpresentation, and caesarean delivery.

What is new?: Bicornuate uterus was associated with the highest number of adverse outcomes, followed by didelphys, subseptate and septate uterus.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn
Facts Views and Vision in ObGyn OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
自引率
15.00%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
3D versus 4K laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure after hysterectomy by surgeons in training: a prospective randomised trial. Achieving successful outcomes with endometrial ablation needs better case selection. Author's response. Caesarean scar defect and retained products of conception (RPOC): a step-by-step combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic treatment. Electrosurgery: heating, sparking and electrical arcs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1