使用冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术与侵入性冠状动脉血管造影术,比较女性 IschemiA TRial 以减少非诱发性 CAD(WARRIOR)事件试验参与者的风险概况。

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Progress in cardiovascular diseases Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pcad.2024.03.008
Suvasini Lakshmanan , Janet Wei , Galen Cook-Wiens , Carl J. Pepine , Eileen M. Handberg , Leslee J. Shaw , Matthew Budoff , C. Noel Bairey Merz
{"title":"使用冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术与侵入性冠状动脉血管造影术,比较女性 IschemiA TRial 以减少非诱发性 CAD(WARRIOR)事件试验参与者的风险概况。","authors":"Suvasini Lakshmanan ,&nbsp;Janet Wei ,&nbsp;Galen Cook-Wiens ,&nbsp;Carl J. Pepine ,&nbsp;Eileen M. Handberg ,&nbsp;Leslee J. Shaw ,&nbsp;Matthew Budoff ,&nbsp;C. Noel Bairey Merz","doi":"10.1016/j.pcad.2024.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare baseline characteristics of participants in the <u>W</u>omen's Ischemi<u>A</u> T<u>R</u>ial to <u>R</u>educe Events <u>I</u>n Non-Obst<u>R</u>uctive CAD (WARRIOR) trial by qualification by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) or Invasive Coronary Angiography (ICA).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The WARRIOR trial (<span>NCT03417388</span><svg><path></path></svg>) is an ongoing multicenter, prospective, randomized, blinded outcome evaluation of intensive medical therapy vs. usual care in women with suspected Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (INOCA) identified by either CCTA or ICA on the outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). No obstructive coronary artery disease is defined as &lt;50% luminal stenosis and normal coronary arteries is defined as no evidence of atherosclerosis including calcified and non-calcified plaque. Data presented was extracted on May 27, 2020. No clinical outcomes were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>An initial sample cohort of 797 women was included. The majority were younger than 65 years, White participants (73.3%), 159 had diabetes (19.9%), and 676 had angina (84.8%) with the remainder having symptoms of suspected ischemic heart disease. Over 50% of randomized participants had normal coronaries without luminal irregularities by ICA or CCTA. Participants randomized to ICA were more likely to have worse baseline clinical risk profiles with older age, higher burden of cardiac risk factors and poor quality of life with disabling angina.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Among this initial sample of women with suspected INOCA randomized in the WARRIOR trial, there is a differential baseline cardiac risk of participants enrolled after CCTA or ICA. However, the majority had no evidence of atherosclerotic plaque or obstructive stenosis, after evaluation by ICA or CCTA. These results suggest that non-invasive evaluation with CCTA is likely to be associated with lower risk of MACE.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21156,"journal":{"name":"Progress in cardiovascular diseases","volume":"84 ","pages":"Pages 90-93"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033062024000537/pdfft?md5=6a499213679ba4b24ca8c705c9dd0be6&pid=1-s2.0-S0033062024000537-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of risk profiles of participants in the Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce events In non-ObstRuctive CAD (WARRIOR) trial, using Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography vs Invasive Coronary Angiography\",\"authors\":\"Suvasini Lakshmanan ,&nbsp;Janet Wei ,&nbsp;Galen Cook-Wiens ,&nbsp;Carl J. Pepine ,&nbsp;Eileen M. Handberg ,&nbsp;Leslee J. Shaw ,&nbsp;Matthew Budoff ,&nbsp;C. Noel Bairey Merz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pcad.2024.03.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare baseline characteristics of participants in the <u>W</u>omen's Ischemi<u>A</u> T<u>R</u>ial to <u>R</u>educe Events <u>I</u>n Non-Obst<u>R</u>uctive CAD (WARRIOR) trial by qualification by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) or Invasive Coronary Angiography (ICA).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The WARRIOR trial (<span>NCT03417388</span><svg><path></path></svg>) is an ongoing multicenter, prospective, randomized, blinded outcome evaluation of intensive medical therapy vs. usual care in women with suspected Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (INOCA) identified by either CCTA or ICA on the outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). No obstructive coronary artery disease is defined as &lt;50% luminal stenosis and normal coronary arteries is defined as no evidence of atherosclerosis including calcified and non-calcified plaque. Data presented was extracted on May 27, 2020. No clinical outcomes were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>An initial sample cohort of 797 women was included. The majority were younger than 65 years, White participants (73.3%), 159 had diabetes (19.9%), and 676 had angina (84.8%) with the remainder having symptoms of suspected ischemic heart disease. Over 50% of randomized participants had normal coronaries without luminal irregularities by ICA or CCTA. Participants randomized to ICA were more likely to have worse baseline clinical risk profiles with older age, higher burden of cardiac risk factors and poor quality of life with disabling angina.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Among this initial sample of women with suspected INOCA randomized in the WARRIOR trial, there is a differential baseline cardiac risk of participants enrolled after CCTA or ICA. However, the majority had no evidence of atherosclerotic plaque or obstructive stenosis, after evaluation by ICA or CCTA. These results suggest that non-invasive evaluation with CCTA is likely to be associated with lower risk of MACE.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in cardiovascular diseases\",\"volume\":\"84 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 90-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033062024000537/pdfft?md5=6a499213679ba4b24ca8c705c9dd0be6&pid=1-s2.0-S0033062024000537-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in cardiovascular diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033062024000537\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in cardiovascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033062024000537","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的通过冠状动脉计算机断层扫描(CCTA)或侵入性冠状动脉造影(ICA)鉴定,比较 "女性IschemiA TRial减少非诱发性CAD事件(WARRIOR)试验 "参与者的基线特征:WARRIOR试验(NCT03417388)是一项正在进行中的多中心、前瞻性、随机、盲法结果评估,针对经CCTA或ICA鉴定为疑似缺血且无阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(INOCA)的女性患者,评估强化医疗与常规护理对主要不良心血管事件(MACE)结果的影响。无冠状动脉疾病定义为 结果:最初纳入的样本队列中有 797 名女性。大多数参与者年龄小于 65 岁,为白人(73.3%),159 人患有糖尿病(19.9%),676 人患有心绞痛(84.8%),其余人有疑似缺血性心脏病的症状。50%以上的随机参与者通过 ICA 或 CCTA 检查冠状动脉正常,无管腔不规则。随机接受ICA治疗的患者更有可能具有较差的临床风险基线,如年龄较大、心脏风险因素负担较重以及因致残性心绞痛而生活质量较差等:结论:在 WARRIOR 试验随机抽取的疑似 INOCA 女性患者的初始样本中,接受 CCTA 或 ICA 的患者的基线心脏风险存在差异。不过,大多数人在通过 ICA 或 CCTA 评估后没有发现动脉粥样硬化斑块或阻塞性狭窄。这些结果表明,使用 CCTA 进行无创评估可能会降低 MACE 风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of risk profiles of participants in the Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce events In non-ObstRuctive CAD (WARRIOR) trial, using Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography vs Invasive Coronary Angiography

Objective

To compare baseline characteristics of participants in the Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce Events In Non-ObstRuctive CAD (WARRIOR) trial by qualification by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) or Invasive Coronary Angiography (ICA).

Methods

The WARRIOR trial (NCT03417388) is an ongoing multicenter, prospective, randomized, blinded outcome evaluation of intensive medical therapy vs. usual care in women with suspected Ischemia and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (INOCA) identified by either CCTA or ICA on the outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). No obstructive coronary artery disease is defined as <50% luminal stenosis and normal coronary arteries is defined as no evidence of atherosclerosis including calcified and non-calcified plaque. Data presented was extracted on May 27, 2020. No clinical outcomes were assessed.

Results

An initial sample cohort of 797 women was included. The majority were younger than 65 years, White participants (73.3%), 159 had diabetes (19.9%), and 676 had angina (84.8%) with the remainder having symptoms of suspected ischemic heart disease. Over 50% of randomized participants had normal coronaries without luminal irregularities by ICA or CCTA. Participants randomized to ICA were more likely to have worse baseline clinical risk profiles with older age, higher burden of cardiac risk factors and poor quality of life with disabling angina.

Conclusions

Among this initial sample of women with suspected INOCA randomized in the WARRIOR trial, there is a differential baseline cardiac risk of participants enrolled after CCTA or ICA. However, the majority had no evidence of atherosclerotic plaque or obstructive stenosis, after evaluation by ICA or CCTA. These results suggest that non-invasive evaluation with CCTA is likely to be associated with lower risk of MACE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in cardiovascular diseases
Progress in cardiovascular diseases 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
98
审稿时长
7 days
期刊介绍: Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases provides comprehensive coverage of a single topic related to heart and circulatory disorders in each issue. Some issues include special articles, definitive reviews that capture the state of the art in the management of particular clinical problems in cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Table of contents Editorial Board The connection between sleep deficiency and coronary artery disease: Complexities and controversies A review of the interplay between Takotsubo cardiomyopathy and adrenal insufficiency: Catecholamine surge and glucocorticoid deficiency Dose-response association of an accelerometer-measured physical activity with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease incidence: Prospective cohort with 76,074 participants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1