Kati Burton , Douglas Becker , Tasos Hovardas , Chloe B. Wardropper , Alexander Maas
{"title":"评估希腊预防和管理野火的政策偏好","authors":"Kati Burton , Douglas Becker , Tasos Hovardas , Chloe B. Wardropper , Alexander Maas","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Extreme temperatures and droughts have led to catastrophic wildfires across Greece over the last two decades, with 2023 experiencing the largest fire-driven evacuation in the country's history. Existing wildfire governance approaches may be outdated in the face of these new challenges. Greek residents' attitudes and willingness to pay for additional prevention and mitigation may be changing with the increased threat. Because policy design can affect public support and subsequent outcomes, we conducted an online national-level survey of Greek residents (<em>n</em> = 722) with an embedded discrete choice experiment, aimed at assessing preferences and willingness-to-pay for different policy alternatives to address wildfire risk. Our results suggest that, in general, Greek residents are unsatisfied with current fire policy, are willing to pay a small amount for additional fire mitigation efforts aimed to reduce burned areas, and prefer action led by the Greek Forest or Fire Services using awareness and education campaign—for example, fire prevention informative mailers or workshops.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing policy preferences for preventing and managing wildfire in Greece\",\"authors\":\"Kati Burton , Douglas Becker , Tasos Hovardas , Chloe B. Wardropper , Alexander Maas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Extreme temperatures and droughts have led to catastrophic wildfires across Greece over the last two decades, with 2023 experiencing the largest fire-driven evacuation in the country's history. Existing wildfire governance approaches may be outdated in the face of these new challenges. Greek residents' attitudes and willingness to pay for additional prevention and mitigation may be changing with the increased threat. Because policy design can affect public support and subsequent outcomes, we conducted an online national-level survey of Greek residents (<em>n</em> = 722) with an embedded discrete choice experiment, aimed at assessing preferences and willingness-to-pay for different policy alternatives to address wildfire risk. Our results suggest that, in general, Greek residents are unsatisfied with current fire policy, are willing to pay a small amount for additional fire mitigation efforts aimed to reduce burned areas, and prefer action led by the Greek Forest or Fire Services using awareness and education campaign—for example, fire prevention informative mailers or workshops.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Policy and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124000625\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124000625","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing policy preferences for preventing and managing wildfire in Greece
Extreme temperatures and droughts have led to catastrophic wildfires across Greece over the last two decades, with 2023 experiencing the largest fire-driven evacuation in the country's history. Existing wildfire governance approaches may be outdated in the face of these new challenges. Greek residents' attitudes and willingness to pay for additional prevention and mitigation may be changing with the increased threat. Because policy design can affect public support and subsequent outcomes, we conducted an online national-level survey of Greek residents (n = 722) with an embedded discrete choice experiment, aimed at assessing preferences and willingness-to-pay for different policy alternatives to address wildfire risk. Our results suggest that, in general, Greek residents are unsatisfied with current fire policy, are willing to pay a small amount for additional fire mitigation efforts aimed to reduce burned areas, and prefer action led by the Greek Forest or Fire Services using awareness and education campaign—for example, fire prevention informative mailers or workshops.
期刊介绍:
Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.