在 COVID-19 大流行期间为儿科客户提供远程保健服务:与健康结果有关的范围审查

Gergana Damianova Kodjebacheva , Taylor Culinski , Bushra Kawser , Saman Amin
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间为儿科客户提供远程保健服务:与健康结果有关的范围审查","authors":"Gergana Damianova Kodjebacheva ,&nbsp;Taylor Culinski ,&nbsp;Bushra Kawser ,&nbsp;Saman Amin","doi":"10.1016/j.hsr.2024.100156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective was to conduct a scoping review of interventions on health outcomes among pediatric populations with a variety of health conditions with comparison groups where at least one group was receiving telehealth services during a period within the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Utilizing the PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases, peer-reviewed studies in English on health outcomes following interventions where at least one group was receiving telehealth services were identified. Interventions could have either quasi-experimental designs with at least two groups or randomized designs. No limitations were placed on the health outcomes included in this review. Studies were restricted to those conducted during a period within the COVID-19 pandemic (i.e., published until December 5, 2022). The reporting in this registered scoping review was guided by the standards of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Statement Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). For the purpose of data charting, information on participant descriptive characteristics and intervention strategies, outcomes, and findings was extracted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Ten articles met the criteria from our search on December 5, 2022. Various conditions were represented, such as autism spectrum disorder, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Tourette syndrome, and other physical, mental, and developmental disorders. A total of 4 studies were randomized-controlled trials (RCTs), and the remaining 6 had quasi-experimental designs. Comparison groups received in-person visits, mixed-mode services, different telehealth services, or wait-list interventions. In 6 out of the 8 studies with defined outcomes that were quantified, children receiving telehealth services had statistically significant better health outcomes compared to those in control groups. In 2 of these 8 studies, children receiving telehealth services had either better though not statistically significant health outcomes or had similar health outcomes compared to those in control groups. Examples of health outcome improvements with telehealth use were lower hyperactivity levels, increased muscular strength, and a decrease in tic severity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Health outcome improvements with telehealth use tended to be similar to or superior than those in the control group. Additional investigations, especially RCTs, are advised.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73214,"journal":{"name":"Health sciences review (Oxford, England)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772632024000096/pdfft?md5=fc7f501120d4a5a7f35e91cff473b99c&pid=1-s2.0-S2772632024000096-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Provision of telehealth services to pediatric clients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review related to health outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Gergana Damianova Kodjebacheva ,&nbsp;Taylor Culinski ,&nbsp;Bushra Kawser ,&nbsp;Saman Amin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hsr.2024.100156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective was to conduct a scoping review of interventions on health outcomes among pediatric populations with a variety of health conditions with comparison groups where at least one group was receiving telehealth services during a period within the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Utilizing the PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases, peer-reviewed studies in English on health outcomes following interventions where at least one group was receiving telehealth services were identified. Interventions could have either quasi-experimental designs with at least two groups or randomized designs. No limitations were placed on the health outcomes included in this review. Studies were restricted to those conducted during a period within the COVID-19 pandemic (i.e., published until December 5, 2022). The reporting in this registered scoping review was guided by the standards of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Statement Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). For the purpose of data charting, information on participant descriptive characteristics and intervention strategies, outcomes, and findings was extracted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Ten articles met the criteria from our search on December 5, 2022. Various conditions were represented, such as autism spectrum disorder, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Tourette syndrome, and other physical, mental, and developmental disorders. A total of 4 studies were randomized-controlled trials (RCTs), and the remaining 6 had quasi-experimental designs. Comparison groups received in-person visits, mixed-mode services, different telehealth services, or wait-list interventions. In 6 out of the 8 studies with defined outcomes that were quantified, children receiving telehealth services had statistically significant better health outcomes compared to those in control groups. In 2 of these 8 studies, children receiving telehealth services had either better though not statistically significant health outcomes or had similar health outcomes compared to those in control groups. Examples of health outcome improvements with telehealth use were lower hyperactivity levels, increased muscular strength, and a decrease in tic severity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Health outcome improvements with telehealth use tended to be similar to or superior than those in the control group. Additional investigations, especially RCTs, are advised.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health sciences review (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772632024000096/pdfft?md5=fc7f501120d4a5a7f35e91cff473b99c&pid=1-s2.0-S2772632024000096-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health sciences review (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772632024000096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health sciences review (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772632024000096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的对在 COVID-19 大流行期间至少有一组接受远程保健服务的儿科人群的健康状况进行了一次范围界定审查。方法利用 PubMed、Embase、PsycInfo 和 CINAHL 数据库,对至少有一组接受远程保健服务的干预后的健康状况进行了同行评审的英文研究。干预措施可采用至少两组的准实验设计或随机设计。本综述所包含的健康结果不受限制。研究仅限于在 COVID-19 大流行期间进行的研究(即发表至 2022 年 12 月 5 日)。本注册范围界定综述的报告遵循《范围界定综述的系统综述和荟萃分析声明扩展》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Statement Extension for Scoping Reviews,PRISMA-ScR)的标准。为了绘制数据图表,我们提取了有关参与者描述性特征、干预策略、结果和结论的信息。结果截至 2022 年 12 月 5 日,有十篇文章符合我们的检索标准。文章涉及多种疾病,如自闭症谱系障碍、杜氏肌营养不良症、抽动秽语综合征以及其他身体、精神和发育障碍。共有 4 项研究为随机对照试验 (RCT),其余 6 项为准实验设计。对比组接受了亲诊、混合模式服务、不同的远程保健服务或等待干预。在 8 项有明确量化结果的研究中,有 6 项研究表明,与对照组相比,接受远程保健服务的儿童的健康状况明显更好。在这 8 项研究中,有 2 项研究表明,与对照组相比,接受远程保健服务的儿童的健康状况有所改善,但没有统计学意义,或者健康状况与对照组相似。使用远程保健改善健康状况的例子包括:多动水平降低、肌肉力量增强、抽搐严重程度降低。建议进行更多的调查,尤其是研究性临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Provision of telehealth services to pediatric clients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review related to health outcomes

Objective

The objective was to conduct a scoping review of interventions on health outcomes among pediatric populations with a variety of health conditions with comparison groups where at least one group was receiving telehealth services during a period within the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Utilizing the PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases, peer-reviewed studies in English on health outcomes following interventions where at least one group was receiving telehealth services were identified. Interventions could have either quasi-experimental designs with at least two groups or randomized designs. No limitations were placed on the health outcomes included in this review. Studies were restricted to those conducted during a period within the COVID-19 pandemic (i.e., published until December 5, 2022). The reporting in this registered scoping review was guided by the standards of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Statement Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). For the purpose of data charting, information on participant descriptive characteristics and intervention strategies, outcomes, and findings was extracted.

Results

Ten articles met the criteria from our search on December 5, 2022. Various conditions were represented, such as autism spectrum disorder, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Tourette syndrome, and other physical, mental, and developmental disorders. A total of 4 studies were randomized-controlled trials (RCTs), and the remaining 6 had quasi-experimental designs. Comparison groups received in-person visits, mixed-mode services, different telehealth services, or wait-list interventions. In 6 out of the 8 studies with defined outcomes that were quantified, children receiving telehealth services had statistically significant better health outcomes compared to those in control groups. In 2 of these 8 studies, children receiving telehealth services had either better though not statistically significant health outcomes or had similar health outcomes compared to those in control groups. Examples of health outcome improvements with telehealth use were lower hyperactivity levels, increased muscular strength, and a decrease in tic severity.

Conclusion

Health outcome improvements with telehealth use tended to be similar to or superior than those in the control group. Additional investigations, especially RCTs, are advised.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health sciences review (Oxford, England)
Health sciences review (Oxford, England) Medicine and Dentistry (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
75 days
期刊最新文献
Deciphering the intricacies of immune system dysfunction and its impact on diabetes mellitus: Revisiting the communication strategies to manage diabetes mellitus Revolutionizing menopause management: Nonhormonal therapy for vasomotor symptoms Harnessing the power of natural products against bacterial urinary tract infections: A perspective review for cultivating solutions Unveiling the therapeutic potential of butein: A comprehensive review Advancements in ulcerative colitis management: A critical assessment of etrasimod therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1