加利福尼亚州野火烟尘 PM2.5 对呼吸系统健康影响的空间异质性

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Geohealth Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1029/2023GH000997
V. Do, C. Chen, T. Benmarhnia, J. A. Casey
{"title":"加利福尼亚州野火烟尘 PM2.5 对呼吸系统健康影响的空间异质性","authors":"V. Do,&nbsp;C. Chen,&nbsp;T. Benmarhnia,&nbsp;J. A. Casey","doi":"10.1029/2023GH000997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wildfire smoke fine particles (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) are a growing public health threat as wildfire events become more common and intense under climate change, especially in the Western United States. Studies assessing the association between wildfire PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and health typically summarize the effects over the study area. However, health responses to wildfire PM<sub>2.5</sub> may vary spatially. We evaluated spatially-varying respiratory acute care utilization risks associated with short-term exposure to wildfire PM<sub>2.5</sub> and explored community characteristics possibly driving spatial heterogeneity. Using ensemble-modeled daily wildfire PM<sub>2.5</sub>, we defined a wildfire smoke day to have wildfire-specific PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration ≥15 μg/m<sup>3</sup>. We included daily respiratory emergency department visits and unplanned hospitalizations in 1,396 California ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) and 15 census-derived community characteristics. Employing a case-crossover design and conditional logistic regression, we observed increased odds of respiratory acute care utilization on wildfire smoke days at the state level (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05, 1.07). Across air basins, ORs ranged from 0.88 to 1.57, with the highest effect estimate in San Diego. A within-community matching design and spatial Bayesian hierarchical model also revealed spatial heterogeneity in ZCTA-level rate differences. For example, communities with a higher percentage of Black or Pacific Islander residents had stronger wildfire PM<sub>2.5</sub>-outcome relationships, while more air conditioning and tree canopy attenuated associations. We found an important heterogeneity in wildfire smoke-related health impacts across air basins, counties, and ZCTAs, and we identified characteristics of vulnerable communities, providing evidence to guide policy development and resource allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48618,"journal":{"name":"Geohealth","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023GH000997","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial Heterogeneity of the Respiratory Health Impacts of Wildfire Smoke PM2.5 in California\",\"authors\":\"V. Do,&nbsp;C. Chen,&nbsp;T. Benmarhnia,&nbsp;J. A. Casey\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2023GH000997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Wildfire smoke fine particles (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) are a growing public health threat as wildfire events become more common and intense under climate change, especially in the Western United States. Studies assessing the association between wildfire PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and health typically summarize the effects over the study area. However, health responses to wildfire PM<sub>2.5</sub> may vary spatially. We evaluated spatially-varying respiratory acute care utilization risks associated with short-term exposure to wildfire PM<sub>2.5</sub> and explored community characteristics possibly driving spatial heterogeneity. Using ensemble-modeled daily wildfire PM<sub>2.5</sub>, we defined a wildfire smoke day to have wildfire-specific PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration ≥15 μg/m<sup>3</sup>. We included daily respiratory emergency department visits and unplanned hospitalizations in 1,396 California ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) and 15 census-derived community characteristics. Employing a case-crossover design and conditional logistic regression, we observed increased odds of respiratory acute care utilization on wildfire smoke days at the state level (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05, 1.07). Across air basins, ORs ranged from 0.88 to 1.57, with the highest effect estimate in San Diego. A within-community matching design and spatial Bayesian hierarchical model also revealed spatial heterogeneity in ZCTA-level rate differences. For example, communities with a higher percentage of Black or Pacific Islander residents had stronger wildfire PM<sub>2.5</sub>-outcome relationships, while more air conditioning and tree canopy attenuated associations. We found an important heterogeneity in wildfire smoke-related health impacts across air basins, counties, and ZCTAs, and we identified characteristics of vulnerable communities, providing evidence to guide policy development and resource allocation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geohealth\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023GH000997\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geohealth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023GH000997\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geohealth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023GH000997","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在气候变化的影响下,野火事件变得越来越普遍和激烈,尤其是在美国西部,因此野火烟雾细颗粒物(PM2.5)对公众健康的威胁也越来越大。评估野火 PM2.5 暴露与健康之间关系的研究通常会总结研究区域的影响。然而,野火PM2.5对健康的影响可能因空间而异。我们评估了与短期暴露于野火PM2.5有关的空间变化呼吸道急症护理使用风险,并探讨了可能导致空间异质性的社区特征。我们使用集合模型计算每日野火PM2.5,并将野火烟雾日定义为野火特定PM2.5浓度≥15 μg/m3。我们纳入了加利福尼亚州 1396 个邮政编码表区(ZCTA)的每日呼吸急诊就诊和计划外住院情况以及 15 个人口普查得出的社区特征。通过病例交叉设计和条件逻辑回归,我们观察到在州一级,野火烟雾日呼吸道急诊就诊的几率增加(几率比 [OR] = 1.06,95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.05, 1.07)。在不同的空气流域,OR 值从 0.88 到 1.57 不等,圣地亚哥的效应估计值最高。社区内匹配设计和空间贝叶斯分层模型也揭示了 ZCTA 水平比率差异的空间异质性。例如,黑人或太平洋岛民居民比例较高的社区与野火 PM2.5 结果的关系较强,而空调和树冠较多的社区则削弱了这种关系。我们发现,野火烟雾相关健康影响在空气流域、县和 ZCTA 之间存在重要的异质性,我们还确定了易受影响社区的特征,为指导政策制定和资源分配提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Spatial Heterogeneity of the Respiratory Health Impacts of Wildfire Smoke PM2.5 in California

Wildfire smoke fine particles (PM2.5) are a growing public health threat as wildfire events become more common and intense under climate change, especially in the Western United States. Studies assessing the association between wildfire PM2.5 exposure and health typically summarize the effects over the study area. However, health responses to wildfire PM2.5 may vary spatially. We evaluated spatially-varying respiratory acute care utilization risks associated with short-term exposure to wildfire PM2.5 and explored community characteristics possibly driving spatial heterogeneity. Using ensemble-modeled daily wildfire PM2.5, we defined a wildfire smoke day to have wildfire-specific PM2.5 concentration ≥15 μg/m3. We included daily respiratory emergency department visits and unplanned hospitalizations in 1,396 California ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) and 15 census-derived community characteristics. Employing a case-crossover design and conditional logistic regression, we observed increased odds of respiratory acute care utilization on wildfire smoke days at the state level (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05, 1.07). Across air basins, ORs ranged from 0.88 to 1.57, with the highest effect estimate in San Diego. A within-community matching design and spatial Bayesian hierarchical model also revealed spatial heterogeneity in ZCTA-level rate differences. For example, communities with a higher percentage of Black or Pacific Islander residents had stronger wildfire PM2.5-outcome relationships, while more air conditioning and tree canopy attenuated associations. We found an important heterogeneity in wildfire smoke-related health impacts across air basins, counties, and ZCTAs, and we identified characteristics of vulnerable communities, providing evidence to guide policy development and resource allocation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geohealth
Geohealth Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: GeoHealth will publish original research, reviews, policy discussions, and commentaries that cover the growing science on the interface among the Earth, atmospheric, oceans and environmental sciences, ecology, and the agricultural and health sciences. The journal will cover a wide variety of global and local issues including the impacts of climate change on human, agricultural, and ecosystem health, air and water pollution, environmental persistence of herbicides and pesticides, radiation and health, geomedicine, and the health effects of disasters. Many of these topics and others are of critical importance in the developing world and all require bringing together leading research across multiple disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Planetary Health Booms: Unpacking the Surge in Research Across the Globe Through Joint-Point Analysis Satellite-Derived, Smartphone-Delivered Geospatial Cholera Risk Information for Vulnerable Populations Upstream Oil and Gas Production and Community COVID-19 Case and Mortality Rates in California, USA Association of Long-Term Exposure to PM2.5 Constituents and Green Space With Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis Methods for Quantifying Source-Specific Air Pollution Exposure to Serve Epidemiology, Risk Assessment, and Environmental Justice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1