使用伯特主题建模法测量心理治疗记录中的联盟和症状严重程度。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-29 DOI:10.1007/s10488-024-01356-4
Christopher Lalk, Tobias Steinbrenner, Weronika Kania, Alexander Popko, Robin Wester, Jana Schaffrath, Steffen Eberhardt, Brian Schwartz, Wolfgang Lutz, Julian Rubel
{"title":"使用伯特主题建模法测量心理治疗记录中的联盟和症状严重程度。","authors":"Christopher Lalk, Tobias Steinbrenner, Weronika Kania, Alexander Popko, Robin Wester, Jana Schaffrath, Steffen Eberhardt, Brian Schwartz, Wolfgang Lutz, Julian Rubel","doi":"10.1007/s10488-024-01356-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aim to use topic modeling, an approach for discovering clusters of related words (\"topics\"), to predict symptom severity and therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy transcripts, while also identifying the most important topics and overarching themes for prediction. We analyzed 552 psychotherapy transcripts from 124 patients. Using BERTopic (Grootendorst, 2022), we extracted 250 topics each for patient and therapist speech. These topics were used to predict symptom severity and alliance with various competing machine-learning methods. Sensitivity analyses were calculated for a model based on 50 topics, LDA-based topic modeling, and a bigram model. Additionally, we grouped topics into themes using qualitative analysis and identified key topics and themes with eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). Symptom severity could be predicted with highest accuracy by patient topics ( <math><mi>r</mi></math> =0.45, 95%-CI 0.40, 0.51), whereas alliance was better predicted by therapist topics ( <math><mi>r</mi></math> =0.20, 95%-CI 0.16, 0.24). Drivers for symptom severity were themes related to health and negative experiences. Lower alliance was correlated with various themes, especially psychotherapy framework, income, and everyday life. This analysis shows the potential of using topic modeling in psychotherapy research allowing to predict several treatment-relevant metrics with reasonable accuracy. Further, the use of XAI allows for an analysis of the individual predictive value of topics and themes. Limitations entail heterogeneity across different topic modeling hyperparameters and a relatively small sample size.</p>","PeriodicalId":7195,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11196307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Alliance and Symptom Severity in Psychotherapy Transcripts Using Bert Topic Modeling.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Lalk, Tobias Steinbrenner, Weronika Kania, Alexander Popko, Robin Wester, Jana Schaffrath, Steffen Eberhardt, Brian Schwartz, Wolfgang Lutz, Julian Rubel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10488-024-01356-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We aim to use topic modeling, an approach for discovering clusters of related words (\\\"topics\\\"), to predict symptom severity and therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy transcripts, while also identifying the most important topics and overarching themes for prediction. We analyzed 552 psychotherapy transcripts from 124 patients. Using BERTopic (Grootendorst, 2022), we extracted 250 topics each for patient and therapist speech. These topics were used to predict symptom severity and alliance with various competing machine-learning methods. Sensitivity analyses were calculated for a model based on 50 topics, LDA-based topic modeling, and a bigram model. Additionally, we grouped topics into themes using qualitative analysis and identified key topics and themes with eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). Symptom severity could be predicted with highest accuracy by patient topics ( <math><mi>r</mi></math> =0.45, 95%-CI 0.40, 0.51), whereas alliance was better predicted by therapist topics ( <math><mi>r</mi></math> =0.20, 95%-CI 0.16, 0.24). Drivers for symptom severity were themes related to health and negative experiences. Lower alliance was correlated with various themes, especially psychotherapy framework, income, and everyday life. This analysis shows the potential of using topic modeling in psychotherapy research allowing to predict several treatment-relevant metrics with reasonable accuracy. Further, the use of XAI allows for an analysis of the individual predictive value of topics and themes. Limitations entail heterogeneity across different topic modeling hyperparameters and a relatively small sample size.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11196307/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-024-01356-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-024-01356-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目标是使用主题建模(一种发现相关词组("主题")的方法)来预测心理治疗记录中的症状严重程度和治疗联盟,同时找出最重要的主题和最重要的预测主题。我们分析了 124 名患者的 552 份心理治疗记录。使用 BERTopic(Grootendorst,2022 年),我们为患者和治疗师的发言各提取了 250 个主题。这些主题被用于预测症状严重程度和各种竞争性机器学习方法的联盟。我们计算了基于 50 个主题的模型、基于 LDA 的主题建模和 bigram 模型的灵敏度分析。此外,我们还利用定性分析将主题分组,并利用可解释人工智能(XAI)识别关键主题和主题。患者主题对症状严重程度的预测准确率最高(r =0.45, 95%-CI 0.40, 0.51),而治疗师主题对联盟的预测较好(r =0.20, 95%-CI 0.16, 0.24)。症状严重程度的驱动因素是与健康和负面经历相关的主题。较低的联盟度与各种主题相关,尤其是心理治疗框架、收入和日常生活。这项分析表明了在心理治疗研究中使用主题建模的潜力,可以合理准确地预测多个与治疗相关的指标。此外,使用 XAI 可以分析主题和专题的个别预测价值。不足之处在于不同的主题建模超参数之间存在异质性,而且样本量相对较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring Alliance and Symptom Severity in Psychotherapy Transcripts Using Bert Topic Modeling.

We aim to use topic modeling, an approach for discovering clusters of related words ("topics"), to predict symptom severity and therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy transcripts, while also identifying the most important topics and overarching themes for prediction. We analyzed 552 psychotherapy transcripts from 124 patients. Using BERTopic (Grootendorst, 2022), we extracted 250 topics each for patient and therapist speech. These topics were used to predict symptom severity and alliance with various competing machine-learning methods. Sensitivity analyses were calculated for a model based on 50 topics, LDA-based topic modeling, and a bigram model. Additionally, we grouped topics into themes using qualitative analysis and identified key topics and themes with eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). Symptom severity could be predicted with highest accuracy by patient topics ( r =0.45, 95%-CI 0.40, 0.51), whereas alliance was better predicted by therapist topics ( r =0.20, 95%-CI 0.16, 0.24). Drivers for symptom severity were themes related to health and negative experiences. Lower alliance was correlated with various themes, especially psychotherapy framework, income, and everyday life. This analysis shows the potential of using topic modeling in psychotherapy research allowing to predict several treatment-relevant metrics with reasonable accuracy. Further, the use of XAI allows for an analysis of the individual predictive value of topics and themes. Limitations entail heterogeneity across different topic modeling hyperparameters and a relatively small sample size.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The aim of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services is to improve mental health services through research. This journal primarily publishes peer-reviewed, original empirical research articles.  The journal also welcomes systematic reviews. Please contact the editor if you have suggestions for special issues or sections focusing on important contemporary issues.  The journal usually does not publish articles on drug or alcohol addiction unless it focuses on persons who are dually diagnosed. Manuscripts on children and adults are equally welcome. Topics for articles may include, but need not be limited to, effectiveness of services, measure development, economics of mental health services, managed mental health care, implementation of services, staffing, leadership, organizational relations and policy, and the like.  Please review previously published articles for fit with our journal before submitting your manuscript.
期刊最新文献
The Importance of Patient Experience in Obtaining Mental Health Care at HRSA-Funded Health Centers. Outcomes that Matter to Youth and Families in Behavioral Health Services. "So Many Other Things Improve" with Transdiagnostic Treatment for Sleep and Circadian Problems: Interviews with Community Providers on Treating Clients with Serious Mental Illness. Patients' and Therapists' Experiences of Standardized Group Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Needs for a Personalized Approach. A Qualitative Analysis of Stakeholder Attitudes Regarding Personalized Provider Selection and Patient-Therapist Matching.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1