In-silico studies of hydroxyxanthone derivatives as potential pfDHFR and pfDHODH inhibitor by molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation, MM-PBSA calculation and pharmacokinetics prediction

The investigation of hydroxyxanthone derivatives has been conducted, including molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation MM-PBSA binding energy calculation, and pharmacokinetics prediction of the potential plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase (pfDHFR) and plasmodium falciparum dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (pfDHODH) inhibitor. The Docking result showed that compound 1,3,6,7-tetrahydroxy-5,8-bis(3-methyl-2-buten-1-yl)-9H-xanthen-9-one (X16) was found to be the best ligand with good inhibitory action against pfDHFR. Meanwhile, the pfDHODH protein was compounded 1,3,6,7-tetrahydroxy-5,8-dinitro-9H-xanthen-9-one (X14). Additionally, the hydroxyxanthone X16 complex showed more excellent stability in the molecular dynamics simulation of the pfDHFR protein than the ligand WR99210 and chloroquine. The MM-PBSA calculation showed that compound X16 had lower binding energy than ligand WR99210. However, 1,3-dihydroxy-8-(3-methyl-2-buten-1-yl)-9H-xanthen-9-one (X4), 1,3,6,7-tetrahydroxy-8-nitro-9H-xanthen-9-one (X10), 1,3,6,7-tetrahydroxy-9-oxo-9H-xanthene-8-sulfonic acid (X11), and 1,3,6,7-tetrahydroxy-5,8-dinitro-9H-xanthen-9-one (X14) complexes were shown to be more stable than chloroquine and to have the same stability when compared to the native ligand A26, according to a molecular dynamics simulation conducted in pfDHODH protein. The MM-PBSA calculation showed that compound X14 had lower binding energy than ligand A26. The hydroxyxanthones X4, X10–11, X14, and X16 fulfill Lipinski's rule parameters in terms of physicochemical and ADMET qualities and parameters related to absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity tests. To sum up, hydroxyxanthones X4, X10–11, X14, and X16 have the potential to be antimalarial medications, but more in vivo and in vitro testing is needed to confirm this.