在积极治疗方案下植入地塞米松的真实体验:ProDEX 研究。

IF 4.4 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmology. Retina Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.oret.2024.03.019
{"title":"在积极治疗方案下植入地塞米松的真实体验:ProDEX 研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.oret.2024.03.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To assess the effectiveness of switching intravitreal dexamethasone<span> implants (DEX-implant) from pro re nata (PRN) treatment regimen to a proactive regimen in patients with macular edema of diverse etiologies.</span></p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>An observational, retrospective, uncontrolled, multicenter, national case series.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Eighty-one eyes from 68 patients treated between October 2015 and June 2023 were included.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>This study included consecutive eyes treated with DEX-implant who were switched from a PRN regimen to a proactive regimen for diabetic macular edema<span> (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), noninfectious </span></span>uveitis<span> macular edema (UME; including postsurgical macular edema), and radiation </span></span>maculopathy (RM).</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>The main outcome measures were change in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) at each visit.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>According to the etiology, DME represented 49.4% of eyes, UME 24.3%, RVO 21.0%, and RM 6.2%. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) duration of follow-up under the PRN and proactive regimens was 20.6 (13.3) and 14.2 (10.3) months, respectively. Switching from a PRN to a proactive regimen significantly improved mean (SD) BCVA by 3.7 (12.9) ETDRS letters (<em>P</em> = 0.01) with a mean (SD) decrease in CMT of 108.0 (151.4) μm (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The proportion of visits with significant anatomic recurrence (&gt; 50 μm) also decreased from 40.1% to 6.0% after switching to a proactive regimen (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The number of DEX-implant injections significantly increased during the proactive treatment period (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), but the change in the number of visits was not significantly different (<em>P</em> = 0.2). The proactive treatment period was not associated with a significant increase in IOP (<em>P</em> = 0.6).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Switching to a proactive regimen in patients already treated with DEX-implant seems to significantly improve BCVA and CMT while maintaining stable IOP.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosures</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19501,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Retina","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dexamethasone Implant under a Proactive Treatment Regimen in a Clinical Setting\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oret.2024.03.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To assess the effectiveness of switching intravitreal dexamethasone<span> implants (DEX-implant) from pro re nata (PRN) treatment regimen to a proactive regimen in patients with macular edema of diverse etiologies.</span></p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>An observational, retrospective, uncontrolled, multicenter, national case series.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Eighty-one eyes from 68 patients treated between October 2015 and June 2023 were included.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>This study included consecutive eyes treated with DEX-implant who were switched from a PRN regimen to a proactive regimen for diabetic macular edema<span> (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), noninfectious </span></span>uveitis<span> macular edema (UME; including postsurgical macular edema), and radiation </span></span>maculopathy (RM).</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>The main outcome measures were change in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) at each visit.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>According to the etiology, DME represented 49.4% of eyes, UME 24.3%, RVO 21.0%, and RM 6.2%. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) duration of follow-up under the PRN and proactive regimens was 20.6 (13.3) and 14.2 (10.3) months, respectively. Switching from a PRN to a proactive regimen significantly improved mean (SD) BCVA by 3.7 (12.9) ETDRS letters (<em>P</em> = 0.01) with a mean (SD) decrease in CMT of 108.0 (151.4) μm (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The proportion of visits with significant anatomic recurrence (&gt; 50 μm) also decreased from 40.1% to 6.0% after switching to a proactive regimen (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The number of DEX-implant injections significantly increased during the proactive treatment period (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), but the change in the number of visits was not significantly different (<em>P</em> = 0.2). The proactive treatment period was not associated with a significant increase in IOP (<em>P</em> = 0.6).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Switching to a proactive regimen in patients already treated with DEX-implant seems to significantly improve BCVA and CMT while maintaining stable IOP.</p></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosures</h3><p>Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology. Retina\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology. Retina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468653024001672\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Retina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468653024001672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估在不同病因引起的黄斑水肿患者中,将玻璃体内地塞米松植入剂(DEX-植入剂)从临时治疗方案转为主动治疗方案的效果:设计:观察性、回顾性、非对照、多中心、全国性病例系列:方法:本研究纳入 2015 年 10 月至 2023 年 6 月期间接受治疗的 68 名患者的 81 只眼睛:本研究纳入了使用DEX-植入剂治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)、视网膜静脉闭塞(RVO)、非感染性葡萄膜炎黄斑水肿(UME;包括手术后黄斑水肿)和放射性黄斑病变(RM)的从PRN方案转为主动方案的连续患者:主要结果指标:每次就诊时最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、黄斑中心厚度(CMT)和眼压(IOP)的变化:根据病因,DME 占 49.4%,UME 占 24.3%,RVO 占 21.0%,RM 占 6.2%。PRN和主动方案的平均(标清)随访时间分别为20.6(13.3)个月和14.2(10.3)个月。从PRN方案转为主动方案后,BCVA的平均(标度)显著提高了3.7(12.9)个ETDRS字母(p=0.01),CMT的平均(标度)下降了108.0(151.4)μm(p50μm),转为主动方案后,CMT的平均(标度)下降率也从40.1%降至6.0%(p结论:对于已经接受过 DEX-implant 治疗的患者,改用前瞻性方案似乎能显著改善 BCVA 和 CMT,同时保持眼压稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dexamethasone Implant under a Proactive Treatment Regimen in a Clinical Setting

Purpose

To assess the effectiveness of switching intravitreal dexamethasone implants (DEX-implant) from pro re nata (PRN) treatment regimen to a proactive regimen in patients with macular edema of diverse etiologies.

Design

An observational, retrospective, uncontrolled, multicenter, national case series.

Participants

Eighty-one eyes from 68 patients treated between October 2015 and June 2023 were included.

Methods

This study included consecutive eyes treated with DEX-implant who were switched from a PRN regimen to a proactive regimen for diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), noninfectious uveitis macular edema (UME; including postsurgical macular edema), and radiation maculopathy (RM).

Main Outcome Measures

The main outcome measures were change in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) at each visit.

Results

According to the etiology, DME represented 49.4% of eyes, UME 24.3%, RVO 21.0%, and RM 6.2%. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) duration of follow-up under the PRN and proactive regimens was 20.6 (13.3) and 14.2 (10.3) months, respectively. Switching from a PRN to a proactive regimen significantly improved mean (SD) BCVA by 3.7 (12.9) ETDRS letters (P = 0.01) with a mean (SD) decrease in CMT of 108.0 (151.4) μm (P < 0.001). The proportion of visits with significant anatomic recurrence (> 50 μm) also decreased from 40.1% to 6.0% after switching to a proactive regimen (P < 0.001). The number of DEX-implant injections significantly increased during the proactive treatment period (P < 0.001), but the change in the number of visits was not significantly different (P = 0.2). The proactive treatment period was not associated with a significant increase in IOP (P = 0.6).

Conclusions

Switching to a proactive regimen in patients already treated with DEX-implant seems to significantly improve BCVA and CMT while maintaining stable IOP.

Financial Disclosures

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Retina
Ophthalmology. Retina Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
33 days
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum Editorial Board Table of Contents Bilateral Purtscher-Like Retinopathy Associated with Antiphospholipid Syndrome and Thrombotic Microangiopathy Iris Flocculus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1