全球高地土壤甲烷汇的量化和不确定性:过程、控制、模型限制和改进

IF 10.8 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Earth-Science Reviews Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104758
Hanxiong Song , Changhui Peng , Qiuan Zhu , Zhi Chen , Jean-Pierre Blanchet , Qiuyu Liu , Tong Li , Peng Li , Zelin Liu
{"title":"全球高地土壤甲烷汇的量化和不确定性:过程、控制、模型限制和改进","authors":"Hanxiong Song ,&nbsp;Changhui Peng ,&nbsp;Qiuan Zhu ,&nbsp;Zhi Chen ,&nbsp;Jean-Pierre Blanchet ,&nbsp;Qiuyu Liu ,&nbsp;Tong Li ,&nbsp;Peng Li ,&nbsp;Zelin Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Upland soils constitute the second largest and the only manageable methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) sink, yet current estimations remain substantially uncertain. This review identifies the primary sources of model uncertainties and emphasize the need for improved model accuracy and necessary comprehensiveness to better estimate upland soil CH<sub>4</sub>uptake under global change. We highlight that the limitations of diffusion-reaction models include oversimplified assumptions of upland soils as constant CH<sub>4</sub>sinks and insufficient parameterization of the microbial CH<sub>4</sub> oxidation constants. In process-based biogeochemical models, uncertainties stem from the omission of soil O<sub>2</sub> status and oversimplified Michaelis–Menten kinetics parameterization for upland soils. We also provide three suggestions for better addressing the spatiotemporal variations in soil CH<sub>4</sub> uptake globally. 1) Accounting for the balance between methanotrophy and methanogenesis is the key to accurately assessing CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes at fine to large scales. 2) Improved response curves of methanotrophy to soil moisture, temperature, and mineral nitrogen, as the most important regulators, are needed to correct the underestimated spatial variations in the size of the soil CH<sub>4</sub> sink globally. 3) Improving parameterizations based on the relationships between environmental factors and methanotrophic communities is necessary. Our synthesized model estimations and field observations reveal that inconsistent estimations of the spatial variations in forest soil CH<sub>4</sub> sinks, and the neglect of the drylands (arid and semiarid ecosystems) CH<sub>4</sub> sink are the major sources of uncertainty for global upland soil CH<sub>4</sub> sinks. Given the great potential of soil CH<sub>4</sub> uptake in mitigating the imbalanced global CH<sub>4</sub> budget, we emphasize the necessity of addressing the soil CH<sub>4</sub> exchanges in these key ecosystems, particularly under the impacts of global changes, by integrating continuous in-situ observations with improved models to fully account for the dynamics of the terrestrial CH<sub>4</sub> sink. This review contributes to a more accurate estimation, management, and optimization of global upland soil CH<sub>4</sub> sinks, aiding in the development of effective climate change mitigation strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11483,"journal":{"name":"Earth-Science Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantification and uncertainty of global upland soil methane sinks: Processes, controls, model limitations, and improvements\",\"authors\":\"Hanxiong Song ,&nbsp;Changhui Peng ,&nbsp;Qiuan Zhu ,&nbsp;Zhi Chen ,&nbsp;Jean-Pierre Blanchet ,&nbsp;Qiuyu Liu ,&nbsp;Tong Li ,&nbsp;Peng Li ,&nbsp;Zelin Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Upland soils constitute the second largest and the only manageable methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) sink, yet current estimations remain substantially uncertain. This review identifies the primary sources of model uncertainties and emphasize the need for improved model accuracy and necessary comprehensiveness to better estimate upland soil CH<sub>4</sub>uptake under global change. We highlight that the limitations of diffusion-reaction models include oversimplified assumptions of upland soils as constant CH<sub>4</sub>sinks and insufficient parameterization of the microbial CH<sub>4</sub> oxidation constants. In process-based biogeochemical models, uncertainties stem from the omission of soil O<sub>2</sub> status and oversimplified Michaelis–Menten kinetics parameterization for upland soils. We also provide three suggestions for better addressing the spatiotemporal variations in soil CH<sub>4</sub> uptake globally. 1) Accounting for the balance between methanotrophy and methanogenesis is the key to accurately assessing CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes at fine to large scales. 2) Improved response curves of methanotrophy to soil moisture, temperature, and mineral nitrogen, as the most important regulators, are needed to correct the underestimated spatial variations in the size of the soil CH<sub>4</sub> sink globally. 3) Improving parameterizations based on the relationships between environmental factors and methanotrophic communities is necessary. Our synthesized model estimations and field observations reveal that inconsistent estimations of the spatial variations in forest soil CH<sub>4</sub> sinks, and the neglect of the drylands (arid and semiarid ecosystems) CH<sub>4</sub> sink are the major sources of uncertainty for global upland soil CH<sub>4</sub> sinks. Given the great potential of soil CH<sub>4</sub> uptake in mitigating the imbalanced global CH<sub>4</sub> budget, we emphasize the necessity of addressing the soil CH<sub>4</sub> exchanges in these key ecosystems, particularly under the impacts of global changes, by integrating continuous in-situ observations with improved models to fully account for the dynamics of the terrestrial CH<sub>4</sub> sink. This review contributes to a more accurate estimation, management, and optimization of global upland soil CH<sub>4</sub> sinks, aiding in the development of effective climate change mitigation strategies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth-Science Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth-Science Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825224000850\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth-Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825224000850","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高地土壤是第二大也是唯一可管理的甲烷(CH4)吸收汇,但目前的估算仍存在很大的不确定性。本综述指出了模型不确定性的主要来源,并强调需要提高模型的准确性和必要的全面性,以更好地估计全球变化下高地土壤的甲烷吸收量。我们强调,扩散反应模型的局限性包括将高地土壤假定为恒定的甲烷吸收源以及对微生物甲烷氧化常数的参数化不足。在基于过程的生物地球化学模型中,不确定性源于忽略了土壤中的氧气状况,以及对高地土壤的 Michaelis-Menten 动力学参数化过于简化。我们还提出了三项建议,以更好地应对全球土壤吸收 CH4 的时空变化。1) 考虑甲烷营养和甲烷生成之间的平衡是准确评估从细尺度到大尺度的 CH4 通量的关键。2)需要改进甲烷营养对土壤水分、温度和矿质氮(最重要的调节因子)的响应曲线,以纠正全球土壤CH4吸收汇规模被低估的空间变化。3)有必要根据环境因素与甲烷营养群落之间的关系改进参数设置。我们综合模型估算和实地观测结果发现,对森林土壤CH4汇空间变化的估算不一致以及对旱地(干旱和半干旱生态系统)CH4汇的忽视是全球高地土壤CH4汇不确定性的主要来源。鉴于土壤吸收 CH4 在缓解不平衡的全球 CH4 预算方面的巨大潜力,我们强调有必要解决这些关键生态系统的土壤 CH4 交换问题,尤其是在全球变化的影响下,方法是将连续的原位观测与改进的模型相结合,以充分考虑陆地 CH4 汇的动态。本综述有助于更准确地估算、管理和优化全球高地土壤甲烷汇,从而帮助制定有效的气候变化减缓战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantification and uncertainty of global upland soil methane sinks: Processes, controls, model limitations, and improvements

Upland soils constitute the second largest and the only manageable methane (CH4) sink, yet current estimations remain substantially uncertain. This review identifies the primary sources of model uncertainties and emphasize the need for improved model accuracy and necessary comprehensiveness to better estimate upland soil CH4uptake under global change. We highlight that the limitations of diffusion-reaction models include oversimplified assumptions of upland soils as constant CH4sinks and insufficient parameterization of the microbial CH4 oxidation constants. In process-based biogeochemical models, uncertainties stem from the omission of soil O2 status and oversimplified Michaelis–Menten kinetics parameterization for upland soils. We also provide three suggestions for better addressing the spatiotemporal variations in soil CH4 uptake globally. 1) Accounting for the balance between methanotrophy and methanogenesis is the key to accurately assessing CH4 fluxes at fine to large scales. 2) Improved response curves of methanotrophy to soil moisture, temperature, and mineral nitrogen, as the most important regulators, are needed to correct the underestimated spatial variations in the size of the soil CH4 sink globally. 3) Improving parameterizations based on the relationships between environmental factors and methanotrophic communities is necessary. Our synthesized model estimations and field observations reveal that inconsistent estimations of the spatial variations in forest soil CH4 sinks, and the neglect of the drylands (arid and semiarid ecosystems) CH4 sink are the major sources of uncertainty for global upland soil CH4 sinks. Given the great potential of soil CH4 uptake in mitigating the imbalanced global CH4 budget, we emphasize the necessity of addressing the soil CH4 exchanges in these key ecosystems, particularly under the impacts of global changes, by integrating continuous in-situ observations with improved models to fully account for the dynamics of the terrestrial CH4 sink. This review contributes to a more accurate estimation, management, and optimization of global upland soil CH4 sinks, aiding in the development of effective climate change mitigation strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earth-Science Reviews
Earth-Science Reviews 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
21.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering a much wider field than the usual specialist journals, Earth Science Reviews publishes review articles dealing with all aspects of Earth Sciences, and is an important vehicle for allowing readers to see their particular interest related to the Earth Sciences as a whole.
期刊最新文献
Peat fires and legacy toxic metal release: An integrative biogeochemical and ecohydrological conceptual framework Microplastics Aloft: A comprehensive exploration of sources, transport, variations, interactions and their implications on human health in the atmospheric realm Degradation and local growth of “Xing'an-Baikal” permafrost responding to climate warming and the consequences Deposition and termination of Neoproterozoic iron formations (NIFs): New insights from NIFs in China Mantle-rooted fluid pathways and world-class gold mineralization in the giant Jiaodong gold province: Insights from integrated deep seismic reflection and tectonics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1