人类脓毒性休克中肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统的功能障碍。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Peptides Pub Date : 2024-03-29 DOI:10.1016/j.peptides.2024.171201
Christopher L. Schaich , Daniel E. Leisman , Marcia B. Goldberg , Micheal R. Filbin , Ashish K. Khanna , Mark C. Chappell
{"title":"人类脓毒性休克中肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统的功能障碍。","authors":"Christopher L. Schaich ,&nbsp;Daniel E. Leisman ,&nbsp;Marcia B. Goldberg ,&nbsp;Micheal R. Filbin ,&nbsp;Ashish K. Khanna ,&nbsp;Mark C. Chappell","doi":"10.1016/j.peptides.2024.171201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sepsis and septic shock are global healthcare problems associated with mortality rates of up to 40% despite optimal standard-of-care therapy and constitute the primary cause of death in intensive care units worldwide. Circulating biomarkers of septic shock severity may represent a clinically relevant approach to individualize those patients at risk for worse outcomes early in the course of the disease, which may facilitate early and more precise interventions to improve the clinical course. However, currently used septic shock biomarkers, including lactate, may be non-specific and have variable impact on prognosis and/or disease management. Activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is likely an early event in septic shock, and studies suggest that an elevated level of renin, the early and committed step in the RAAS cascade, is a better predictor of worse outcomes in septic shock, including mortality, than the current standard-of-care measure of lactate. Despite a robust increase in renin, other elements of the RAAS, including endogenous levels of Ang II, may fail to sufficiently increase to maintain blood pressure, tissue perfusion, and protective immune responses in septic shock patients. We review the current clinical literature regarding the dysfunction of the RAAS in septic shock and potential therapeutic approaches to improve clinical outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19765,"journal":{"name":"Peptides","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dysfunction of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in human septic shock\",\"authors\":\"Christopher L. Schaich ,&nbsp;Daniel E. Leisman ,&nbsp;Marcia B. Goldberg ,&nbsp;Micheal R. Filbin ,&nbsp;Ashish K. Khanna ,&nbsp;Mark C. Chappell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.peptides.2024.171201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Sepsis and septic shock are global healthcare problems associated with mortality rates of up to 40% despite optimal standard-of-care therapy and constitute the primary cause of death in intensive care units worldwide. Circulating biomarkers of septic shock severity may represent a clinically relevant approach to individualize those patients at risk for worse outcomes early in the course of the disease, which may facilitate early and more precise interventions to improve the clinical course. However, currently used septic shock biomarkers, including lactate, may be non-specific and have variable impact on prognosis and/or disease management. Activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is likely an early event in septic shock, and studies suggest that an elevated level of renin, the early and committed step in the RAAS cascade, is a better predictor of worse outcomes in septic shock, including mortality, than the current standard-of-care measure of lactate. Despite a robust increase in renin, other elements of the RAAS, including endogenous levels of Ang II, may fail to sufficiently increase to maintain blood pressure, tissue perfusion, and protective immune responses in septic shock patients. We review the current clinical literature regarding the dysfunction of the RAAS in septic shock and potential therapeutic approaches to improve clinical outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peptides\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peptides\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196978124000548\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peptides","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196978124000548","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脓毒症和脓毒性休克是全球性的医疗保健问题,尽管采用了最佳的标准护理疗法,但死亡率仍高达 40%,是全球重症监护病房的主要死亡原因。脓毒性休克严重程度的循环生物标志物可能是一种与临床相关的方法,可用于在疾病早期对有恶化风险的患者进行个体化治疗,这将有助于及早采取更精确的干预措施来改善临床病程。然而,目前使用的脓毒性休克生物标志物(包括乳酸)可能是非特异性的,对预后和/或疾病管理的影响也不尽相同。肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统(RAAS)的激活很可能是脓毒性休克的早期事件,研究表明,肾素是 RAAS 级联的早期和关键步骤,与目前的标准指标乳酸盐相比,肾素水平的升高能更好地预测脓毒性休克的不良预后,包括死亡率。尽管肾素强劲增长,但 RAAS 的其他要素(包括内源性 Ang II 水平)可能无法充分增长以维持脓毒性休克患者的血压、组织灌注和保护性免疫反应。我们回顾了目前有关脓毒性休克 RAAS 功能障碍的临床文献,以及改善临床预后的潜在治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dysfunction of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in human septic shock

Sepsis and septic shock are global healthcare problems associated with mortality rates of up to 40% despite optimal standard-of-care therapy and constitute the primary cause of death in intensive care units worldwide. Circulating biomarkers of septic shock severity may represent a clinically relevant approach to individualize those patients at risk for worse outcomes early in the course of the disease, which may facilitate early and more precise interventions to improve the clinical course. However, currently used septic shock biomarkers, including lactate, may be non-specific and have variable impact on prognosis and/or disease management. Activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is likely an early event in septic shock, and studies suggest that an elevated level of renin, the early and committed step in the RAAS cascade, is a better predictor of worse outcomes in septic shock, including mortality, than the current standard-of-care measure of lactate. Despite a robust increase in renin, other elements of the RAAS, including endogenous levels of Ang II, may fail to sufficiently increase to maintain blood pressure, tissue perfusion, and protective immune responses in septic shock patients. We review the current clinical literature regarding the dysfunction of the RAAS in septic shock and potential therapeutic approaches to improve clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Peptides
Peptides 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
130
审稿时长
28 days
期刊介绍: Peptides is an international journal presenting original contributions on the biochemistry, physiology and pharmacology of biological active peptides, as well as their functions that relate to gastroenterology, endocrinology, and behavioral effects. Peptides emphasizes all aspects of high profile peptide research in mammals and non-mammalian vertebrates. Special consideration can be given to plants and invertebrates. Submission of articles with clinical relevance is particularly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
R-954, a bradykinin B1 receptor antagonist, as a potential therapy in a preclinical endometriosis model Mas receptor blockade impairs exercise-induced cardiac hypertrophy Asprosin-mediated regulation of ovarian functions in mice: An age-dependent study Serum CIAPIN1 is lower in septic patients with cardiac dysfunction Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1