{"title":"通过限制性维度细胞测定法检测细胞类型特异性分子表达水平。","authors":"David Kaplan, Hillard M. Lazarus, Eric Christian","doi":"10.1111/eci.14207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cytometric analysis has been commonly used to delineate distinct cell subpopulations among peripheral blood mononuclear cells by the differential expression of surface receptors. This capability has reached its apogee with high-dimensional approaches such as mass cytometry and spectral cytometry that include simultaneous assessment of 20–50 analytes. Unfortunately, this approach also engenders significant complexity with analytical and interpretational pitfalls.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Here, we demonstrate a complementary approach with restricted-dimensionality to assess cell-type specific intracellular molecular expression levels at exceptional levels of precision. The expression of five analytes was individually assessed in four mononuclear cell-types from peripheral blood.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Distinctions in expression levels were seen between cell-types and between samples from different donor groups. Mononuclear cell-type specific molecular expression levels distinguished pregnant from nonpregnant women and G-CSF-treated from untreated persons. Additionally, the precision of our analysis was sufficient to quantify a novel relationship between two molecules—Rel A and translocator protein—by correlational analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Restricted-dimensional cytometry can provide a complementary approach to define characteristics of cell-type specific intracellular protein and phosphoantigen expression in mononuclear cells.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12013,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eci.14207","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cell-type specific molecular expression levels by restricted-dimensional cytometry\",\"authors\":\"David Kaplan, Hillard M. Lazarus, Eric Christian\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eci.14207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cytometric analysis has been commonly used to delineate distinct cell subpopulations among peripheral blood mononuclear cells by the differential expression of surface receptors. This capability has reached its apogee with high-dimensional approaches such as mass cytometry and spectral cytometry that include simultaneous assessment of 20–50 analytes. Unfortunately, this approach also engenders significant complexity with analytical and interpretational pitfalls.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Here, we demonstrate a complementary approach with restricted-dimensionality to assess cell-type specific intracellular molecular expression levels at exceptional levels of precision. The expression of five analytes was individually assessed in four mononuclear cell-types from peripheral blood.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Distinctions in expression levels were seen between cell-types and between samples from different donor groups. Mononuclear cell-type specific molecular expression levels distinguished pregnant from nonpregnant women and G-CSF-treated from untreated persons. Additionally, the precision of our analysis was sufficient to quantify a novel relationship between two molecules—Rel A and translocator protein—by correlational analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Restricted-dimensional cytometry can provide a complementary approach to define characteristics of cell-type specific intracellular protein and phosphoantigen expression in mononuclear cells.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Clinical Investigation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eci.14207\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Clinical Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.14207\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.14207","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:细胞计量分析常用于通过表面受体的不同表达来划分外周血单核细胞中不同的细胞亚群。质谱细胞计数法和光谱细胞计数法等高维方法可同时评估 20-50 种分析物,使这一功能达到了顶峰。方法:在此,我们展示了一种具有限制维度的互补方法,能以极高的精度评估细胞类型特异性的细胞内分子表达水平。我们分别评估了外周血中四种单核细胞类型中五种分析物的表达:结果:细胞类型之间以及来自不同捐献者群体的样本之间的表达水平存在差异。单核细胞特异性分子表达水平区分了妊娠妇女和非妊娠妇女,以及 G-CSF 治疗者和未治疗者。此外,我们分析的精确度足以通过相关分析量化两种分子--Rel A 和转运蛋白--之间的新关系:结论:限制维细胞测量法是一种补充方法,可用于确定单核细胞中细胞类型特异性胞内蛋白和磷酸抗原的表达特征。
Cell-type specific molecular expression levels by restricted-dimensional cytometry
Background
Cytometric analysis has been commonly used to delineate distinct cell subpopulations among peripheral blood mononuclear cells by the differential expression of surface receptors. This capability has reached its apogee with high-dimensional approaches such as mass cytometry and spectral cytometry that include simultaneous assessment of 20–50 analytes. Unfortunately, this approach also engenders significant complexity with analytical and interpretational pitfalls.
Methods
Here, we demonstrate a complementary approach with restricted-dimensionality to assess cell-type specific intracellular molecular expression levels at exceptional levels of precision. The expression of five analytes was individually assessed in four mononuclear cell-types from peripheral blood.
Results
Distinctions in expression levels were seen between cell-types and between samples from different donor groups. Mononuclear cell-type specific molecular expression levels distinguished pregnant from nonpregnant women and G-CSF-treated from untreated persons. Additionally, the precision of our analysis was sufficient to quantify a novel relationship between two molecules—Rel A and translocator protein—by correlational analysis.
Conclusions
Restricted-dimensional cytometry can provide a complementary approach to define characteristics of cell-type specific intracellular protein and phosphoantigen expression in mononuclear cells.
期刊介绍:
EJCI considers any original contribution from the most sophisticated basic molecular sciences to applied clinical and translational research and evidence-based medicine across a broad range of subspecialties. The EJCI publishes reports of high-quality research that pertain to the genetic, molecular, cellular, or physiological basis of human biology and disease, as well as research that addresses prevalence, diagnosis, course, treatment, and prevention of disease. We are primarily interested in studies directly pertinent to humans, but submission of robust in vitro and animal work is also encouraged. Interdisciplinary work and research using innovative methods and combinations of laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological methodologies and techniques is of great interest to the journal. Several categories of manuscripts (for detailed description see below) are considered: editorials, original articles (also including randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses), reviews (narrative reviews), opinion articles (including debates, perspectives and commentaries); and letters to the Editor.