抗磷脂综合征的实验室评估:实验室数据

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY International Journal of Laboratory Hematology Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1111/ijlh.14273
Camilla J. Kobylecki, Signe Vedel-Krogh, Shoaib Afzal, Jens P. Goetze
{"title":"抗磷脂综合征的实验室评估:实验室数据","authors":"Camilla J. Kobylecki,&nbsp;Signe Vedel-Krogh,&nbsp;Shoaib Afzal,&nbsp;Jens P. Goetze","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.14273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Thorough assessment of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) includes retesting of positive antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) tests after at least 12 weeks, and a full antiphospholipid antibody profile. To what extent this work-up is done in clinical practice is unknown.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data on 25 116 in- and out-hospital patients tested for the presence of lupus anticoagulant (LA), the aPL which most strongly correlates with thrombosis, was extracted from the laboratory information system of the only laboratory that performs LA tests in the Capital Region, Denmark. We estimated fraction of repeated tests, tests repeated within the recommended time span, and fraction with a full aPL profile.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Out of 25 116 patients, 843 were positive for LA (3.3%), and 3948 results were inconclusive (16%). Only 51% (95% CI of the proportion: 48%–54%) (<i>n</i> = 431) of positive tests were repeated. The proportion of inconclusive LA test results increased from 13% (12%–15%) in 2009 to 20% (19%–22%) in 2020. Out of the positive tests repeated within the first year, only 60/353 (17%; 13%–21%) were repeated within 12–16 weeks; 177/353 (50%; 45%–55%) were re-tested within the first 12 weeks of first positive test result. The proportion of patients with a full antiphospholipid antibody profile increased from 161/1978 (8%) in 2010 to 1041/1978 (43%) in 2020.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We found several issues with the laboratory workup of APS. This indicates a need for increased awareness of comprehensive laboratory assessment of possible APS as well as a closer collaboration between the laboratory and clinicians.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14120,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijlh.14273","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laboratory assessment of antiphospholipid syndrome: Laboratory data\",\"authors\":\"Camilla J. Kobylecki,&nbsp;Signe Vedel-Krogh,&nbsp;Shoaib Afzal,&nbsp;Jens P. Goetze\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijlh.14273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thorough assessment of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) includes retesting of positive antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) tests after at least 12 weeks, and a full antiphospholipid antibody profile. To what extent this work-up is done in clinical practice is unknown.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data on 25 116 in- and out-hospital patients tested for the presence of lupus anticoagulant (LA), the aPL which most strongly correlates with thrombosis, was extracted from the laboratory information system of the only laboratory that performs LA tests in the Capital Region, Denmark. We estimated fraction of repeated tests, tests repeated within the recommended time span, and fraction with a full aPL profile.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Out of 25 116 patients, 843 were positive for LA (3.3%), and 3948 results were inconclusive (16%). Only 51% (95% CI of the proportion: 48%–54%) (<i>n</i> = 431) of positive tests were repeated. The proportion of inconclusive LA test results increased from 13% (12%–15%) in 2009 to 20% (19%–22%) in 2020. Out of the positive tests repeated within the first year, only 60/353 (17%; 13%–21%) were repeated within 12–16 weeks; 177/353 (50%; 45%–55%) were re-tested within the first 12 weeks of first positive test result. The proportion of patients with a full antiphospholipid antibody profile increased from 161/1978 (8%) in 2010 to 1041/1978 (43%) in 2020.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>We found several issues with the laboratory workup of APS. This indicates a need for increased awareness of comprehensive laboratory assessment of possible APS as well as a closer collaboration between the laboratory and clinicians.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijlh.14273\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijlh.14273\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijlh.14273","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:抗磷脂综合征(APS)的全面评估包括至少12周后对抗磷脂抗体(aPL)阳性患者进行复查,以及全面的抗磷脂抗体谱检查。但在临床实践中,这种检查在多大程度上得到了执行还不得而知:从丹麦首都地区唯一一家进行狼疮抗凝物检测的实验室的实验室信息系统中提取了25 116名院内外患者的数据,以检测是否存在狼疮抗凝物(LA),狼疮抗凝物是与血栓形成关系最密切的一种抗磷脂抗体。我们估算了重复检测的比例、在建议时间跨度内重复检测的比例以及具有完整 aPL 资料的比例:在 25 116 名患者中,843 人的 LA 检测结果呈阳性(3.3%),3948 人的检测结果不确定(16%)。只有 51%(比例的 95% CI:48%-54%)的阳性检测结果(n = 431)被重复检测。LA检测结果不确定的比例从2009年的13%(12%-15%)上升到2020年的20%(19%-22%)。在第一年内复检的阳性检测结果中,只有 60/353 例(17%;13%-21%)在 12-16 周内复检;177/353 例(50%;45%-55%)在首次检测结果呈阳性的前 12 周内复检。抗磷脂抗体全谱患者的比例从2010年的161/1978(8%)增加到2020年的1041/1978(43%):我们发现 APS 的实验室检查存在一些问题。结论:我们发现实验室对 APS 的检查存在一些问题,这表明有必要提高对可能的 APS 进行全面实验室评估的认识,并加强实验室与临床医生之间的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Laboratory assessment of antiphospholipid syndrome: Laboratory data

Introduction

Thorough assessment of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) includes retesting of positive antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) tests after at least 12 weeks, and a full antiphospholipid antibody profile. To what extent this work-up is done in clinical practice is unknown.

Methods

Data on 25 116 in- and out-hospital patients tested for the presence of lupus anticoagulant (LA), the aPL which most strongly correlates with thrombosis, was extracted from the laboratory information system of the only laboratory that performs LA tests in the Capital Region, Denmark. We estimated fraction of repeated tests, tests repeated within the recommended time span, and fraction with a full aPL profile.

Results

Out of 25 116 patients, 843 were positive for LA (3.3%), and 3948 results were inconclusive (16%). Only 51% (95% CI of the proportion: 48%–54%) (n = 431) of positive tests were repeated. The proportion of inconclusive LA test results increased from 13% (12%–15%) in 2009 to 20% (19%–22%) in 2020. Out of the positive tests repeated within the first year, only 60/353 (17%; 13%–21%) were repeated within 12–16 weeks; 177/353 (50%; 45%–55%) were re-tested within the first 12 weeks of first positive test result. The proportion of patients with a full antiphospholipid antibody profile increased from 161/1978 (8%) in 2010 to 1041/1978 (43%) in 2020.

Conclusion

We found several issues with the laboratory workup of APS. This indicates a need for increased awareness of comprehensive laboratory assessment of possible APS as well as a closer collaboration between the laboratory and clinicians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology provides a forum for the communication of new developments, research topics and the practice of laboratory haematology. The journal publishes invited reviews, full length original articles, and correspondence. The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology is the official journal of the International Society for Laboratory Hematology, which addresses the following sub-disciplines: cellular analysis, flow cytometry, haemostasis and thrombosis, molecular diagnostics, haematology informatics, haemoglobinopathies, point of care testing, standards and guidelines. The journal was launched in 2006 as the successor to Clinical and Laboratory Hematology, which was first published in 1979. An active and positive editorial policy ensures that work of a high scientific standard is reported, in order to bridge the gap between practical and academic aspects of laboratory haematology.
期刊最新文献
Increased Platelet Size and Elevated P2Y12 mRNA Expression Levels in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Deep Learning‐Based Blood Abnormalities Detection as a Tool for VEXAS Syndrome Screening A novel TNFRSF13B frameshift variant in one family with lymphoid neoplasms Frozen/Thawed Samples Can Replace Fresh Samples for Assignment of ISI to Secondary Thromboplastin Standards for Multiple Reagent/Instrument Combinations: Data to Support Possible Revision of WHO Guidelines Interferon Regulatory Factor 4: An Alternative Marker for Plasma Cells in Daratumumab‐Treated Patients With Multiple Myeloma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1