Camilla J. Kobylecki, Signe Vedel-Krogh, Shoaib Afzal, Jens P. Goetze
{"title":"抗磷脂综合征的实验室评估:实验室数据","authors":"Camilla J. Kobylecki, Signe Vedel-Krogh, Shoaib Afzal, Jens P. Goetze","doi":"10.1111/ijlh.14273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Thorough assessment of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) includes retesting of positive antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) tests after at least 12 weeks, and a full antiphospholipid antibody profile. To what extent this work-up is done in clinical practice is unknown.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data on 25 116 in- and out-hospital patients tested for the presence of lupus anticoagulant (LA), the aPL which most strongly correlates with thrombosis, was extracted from the laboratory information system of the only laboratory that performs LA tests in the Capital Region, Denmark. We estimated fraction of repeated tests, tests repeated within the recommended time span, and fraction with a full aPL profile.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Out of 25 116 patients, 843 were positive for LA (3.3%), and 3948 results were inconclusive (16%). Only 51% (95% CI of the proportion: 48%–54%) (<i>n</i> = 431) of positive tests were repeated. The proportion of inconclusive LA test results increased from 13% (12%–15%) in 2009 to 20% (19%–22%) in 2020. Out of the positive tests repeated within the first year, only 60/353 (17%; 13%–21%) were repeated within 12–16 weeks; 177/353 (50%; 45%–55%) were re-tested within the first 12 weeks of first positive test result. The proportion of patients with a full antiphospholipid antibody profile increased from 161/1978 (8%) in 2010 to 1041/1978 (43%) in 2020.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We found several issues with the laboratory workup of APS. This indicates a need for increased awareness of comprehensive laboratory assessment of possible APS as well as a closer collaboration between the laboratory and clinicians.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14120,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","volume":"46 4","pages":"714-721"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijlh.14273","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laboratory assessment of antiphospholipid syndrome: Laboratory data\",\"authors\":\"Camilla J. Kobylecki, Signe Vedel-Krogh, Shoaib Afzal, Jens P. Goetze\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijlh.14273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thorough assessment of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) includes retesting of positive antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) tests after at least 12 weeks, and a full antiphospholipid antibody profile. To what extent this work-up is done in clinical practice is unknown.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data on 25 116 in- and out-hospital patients tested for the presence of lupus anticoagulant (LA), the aPL which most strongly correlates with thrombosis, was extracted from the laboratory information system of the only laboratory that performs LA tests in the Capital Region, Denmark. We estimated fraction of repeated tests, tests repeated within the recommended time span, and fraction with a full aPL profile.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Out of 25 116 patients, 843 were positive for LA (3.3%), and 3948 results were inconclusive (16%). Only 51% (95% CI of the proportion: 48%–54%) (<i>n</i> = 431) of positive tests were repeated. The proportion of inconclusive LA test results increased from 13% (12%–15%) in 2009 to 20% (19%–22%) in 2020. Out of the positive tests repeated within the first year, only 60/353 (17%; 13%–21%) were repeated within 12–16 weeks; 177/353 (50%; 45%–55%) were re-tested within the first 12 weeks of first positive test result. The proportion of patients with a full antiphospholipid antibody profile increased from 161/1978 (8%) in 2010 to 1041/1978 (43%) in 2020.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>We found several issues with the laboratory workup of APS. This indicates a need for increased awareness of comprehensive laboratory assessment of possible APS as well as a closer collaboration between the laboratory and clinicians.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology\",\"volume\":\"46 4\",\"pages\":\"714-721\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijlh.14273\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijlh.14273\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Laboratory Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijlh.14273","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Laboratory assessment of antiphospholipid syndrome: Laboratory data
Introduction
Thorough assessment of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) includes retesting of positive antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) tests after at least 12 weeks, and a full antiphospholipid antibody profile. To what extent this work-up is done in clinical practice is unknown.
Methods
Data on 25 116 in- and out-hospital patients tested for the presence of lupus anticoagulant (LA), the aPL which most strongly correlates with thrombosis, was extracted from the laboratory information system of the only laboratory that performs LA tests in the Capital Region, Denmark. We estimated fraction of repeated tests, tests repeated within the recommended time span, and fraction with a full aPL profile.
Results
Out of 25 116 patients, 843 were positive for LA (3.3%), and 3948 results were inconclusive (16%). Only 51% (95% CI of the proportion: 48%–54%) (n = 431) of positive tests were repeated. The proportion of inconclusive LA test results increased from 13% (12%–15%) in 2009 to 20% (19%–22%) in 2020. Out of the positive tests repeated within the first year, only 60/353 (17%; 13%–21%) were repeated within 12–16 weeks; 177/353 (50%; 45%–55%) were re-tested within the first 12 weeks of first positive test result. The proportion of patients with a full antiphospholipid antibody profile increased from 161/1978 (8%) in 2010 to 1041/1978 (43%) in 2020.
Conclusion
We found several issues with the laboratory workup of APS. This indicates a need for increased awareness of comprehensive laboratory assessment of possible APS as well as a closer collaboration between the laboratory and clinicians.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology provides a forum for the communication of new developments, research topics and the practice of laboratory haematology.
The journal publishes invited reviews, full length original articles, and correspondence.
The International Journal of Laboratory Hematology is the official journal of the International Society for Laboratory Hematology, which addresses the following sub-disciplines: cellular analysis, flow cytometry, haemostasis and thrombosis, molecular diagnostics, haematology informatics, haemoglobinopathies, point of care testing, standards and guidelines.
The journal was launched in 2006 as the successor to Clinical and Laboratory Hematology, which was first published in 1979. An active and positive editorial policy ensures that work of a high scientific standard is reported, in order to bridge the gap between practical and academic aspects of laboratory haematology.