在 CMIP5 模式下使用不同跟踪方案对北印度洋热带气旋的预测

IF 6.1 1区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Weather and Climate Extremes Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1016/j.wace.2024.100664
Md Wahiduzzaman
{"title":"在 CMIP5 模式下使用不同跟踪方案对北印度洋热带气旋的预测","authors":"Md Wahiduzzaman","doi":"10.1016/j.wace.2024.100664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research compares two different methods of tracing cyclones in the North Indian Ocean (NIO)- (i) Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Direct Detection (CDD) and Okubo-Weiss-Zeta parameter (OWZ) in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) model data. Many CMIP5 models are evaluated against TC observations from the International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS) and a statistical Generalised Additive Model for climate change projections in the past (1970–2000). Estimates of TCs' potential future occurrence in the NIO are evaluated using CMIP5 models (2070–2 100). When compared to historical tracks, the geographic distribution of TCs generated by both detection techniques is consistent with what would be expected, and the frequency of TCs in the models is, with a few exceptions, consistent with observations. Generally, the OWZ plan results in more TCs per unit time than the CDD scheme. Though there are significant differences between the two tracking techniques, a small number of models have TC counts that are virtually similar. Compared to the CDD plan, the OWZ scheme generally has higher performance in the NIO area.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48630,"journal":{"name":"Weather and Climate Extremes","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100664"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212094724000252/pdfft?md5=6c6a31380bae3abe935d3f084b91859c&pid=1-s2.0-S2212094724000252-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Projections of tropical cyclones over the north Indian Ocean using different tracking schemes under CMIP5 models\",\"authors\":\"Md Wahiduzzaman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wace.2024.100664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This research compares two different methods of tracing cyclones in the North Indian Ocean (NIO)- (i) Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Direct Detection (CDD) and Okubo-Weiss-Zeta parameter (OWZ) in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) model data. Many CMIP5 models are evaluated against TC observations from the International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS) and a statistical Generalised Additive Model for climate change projections in the past (1970–2000). Estimates of TCs' potential future occurrence in the NIO are evaluated using CMIP5 models (2070–2 100). When compared to historical tracks, the geographic distribution of TCs generated by both detection techniques is consistent with what would be expected, and the frequency of TCs in the models is, with a few exceptions, consistent with observations. Generally, the OWZ plan results in more TCs per unit time than the CDD scheme. Though there are significant differences between the two tracking techniques, a small number of models have TC counts that are virtually similar. Compared to the CDD plan, the OWZ scheme generally has higher performance in the NIO area.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Weather and Climate Extremes\",\"volume\":\"44 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100664\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212094724000252/pdfft?md5=6c6a31380bae3abe935d3f084b91859c&pid=1-s2.0-S2212094724000252-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Weather and Climate Extremes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212094724000252\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weather and Climate Extremes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212094724000252","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究比较了北印度洋(NIO)气旋追踪的两种不同方法--(i) 英联邦科学与工业研究组织(CSIRO)直接探测(CDD)和耦合模式相互比较项目第 5 阶段(CMIP5)模式数据中的 Okubo-Weiss-Zeta 参数(OWZ)。许多 CMIP5 模式都是根据国际气候管理最佳跟踪档案(IBTrACS)和过去(1970-2000 年)气候变化预测统计广义相加模式的 TC 观测数据进行评估的。利用 CMIP5 模型(2070-2100 年)评估了未来北印度洋群岛可能出现的热带气旋。与历史路径相比,两种探测技术生成的热气旋地理分布与预期一致,除少数例外,模式中的热气旋频率与观测结果一致。一般来说,OWZ 方案比 CDD 方案在单位时间内产生更多的热气旋。虽然两种跟踪技术之间存在显著差异,但少数模型中的 TC 数量几乎相似。与 CDD 方案相比,OWZ 方案通常在 NIO 区域具有更高的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Projections of tropical cyclones over the north Indian Ocean using different tracking schemes under CMIP5 models

This research compares two different methods of tracing cyclones in the North Indian Ocean (NIO)- (i) Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Direct Detection (CDD) and Okubo-Weiss-Zeta parameter (OWZ) in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) model data. Many CMIP5 models are evaluated against TC observations from the International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS) and a statistical Generalised Additive Model for climate change projections in the past (1970–2000). Estimates of TCs' potential future occurrence in the NIO are evaluated using CMIP5 models (2070–2 100). When compared to historical tracks, the geographic distribution of TCs generated by both detection techniques is consistent with what would be expected, and the frequency of TCs in the models is, with a few exceptions, consistent with observations. Generally, the OWZ plan results in more TCs per unit time than the CDD scheme. Though there are significant differences between the two tracking techniques, a small number of models have TC counts that are virtually similar. Compared to the CDD plan, the OWZ scheme generally has higher performance in the NIO area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Weather and Climate Extremes
Weather and Climate Extremes Earth and Planetary Sciences-Atmospheric Science
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
102
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: Weather and Climate Extremes Target Audience: Academics Decision makers International development agencies Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) Civil society Focus Areas: Research in weather and climate extremes Monitoring and early warning systems Assessment of vulnerability and impacts Developing and implementing intervention policies Effective risk management and adaptation practices Engagement of local communities in adopting coping strategies Information and communication strategies tailored to local and regional needs and circumstances
期刊最新文献
Triggers of inland heavy rainfall inducing convective storms in West Africa : Case study of June, 2021 Spatiotemporal variation of intra-urban heat and heatwaves across Greater Sydney, Australia Projecting impacts of extreme weather events on crop yields using LASSO regression Moisture sources for the unprecedented precipitation event in the heart of Taklimakan desert China is suffering from fewer but more severe drought to flood abrupt alternation events
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1