通过文化背景重新审视养育子女问题:跨文化敏感育儿量表(ISPAS)的开发和初步心理计量证据

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL International Journal of Intercultural Relations Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.101966
Ali Karababa
{"title":"通过文化背景重新审视养育子女问题:跨文化敏感育儿量表(ISPAS)的开发和初步心理计量证据","authors":"Ali Karababa","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.101966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to evaluate the measurement characteristics of a newly developed scale to assess interculturally sensitive parenting for mothers and fathers of children and adolescents ranging from 4 to 18 years of age. The development of the Interculturally Sensitive Parenting Scale (ISPAS) ended up with five separate samples, with a total of 1522 parents (884 mothers and 638 fathers), in a five-step process. In the first phase, we generated a pool with 28 items and received input from content experts (n = 5) and cognitive interviews (n = 10), resulting in 23 items. In Study 2 (n = 602), which included inter-item and item-total correlations, eigenvalues, exploratory factor analysis, scree plots, and parallel analysis, six more items were excluded from the item pool, resulting in a one-dimensional construct with 17 items. In Study 3 (n = 607), along with parenting role (mother and father) invariance, confirmatory factor analysis supported the single-factor construct with 17 items, with excellent internal consistency with a high Cronbach's alpha. In Study 4 (n = 303), the analyses indicated that the ISPAS with a one-dimensional construct had good discriminant and convergent validity. Lastly, the 4-week test-retest reliability analysis of the ISPAS in Study 5 (n = 204) supported the stability of the measure. Taken together, the findings validated the usage of the 17-item ISPAS in reliably assessing mothers' and fathers' interculturally sensitive parenting. We hope academics from different disciplines, practitioners, mental health professionals, and educators will benefit from the assessment of the ISPAS presented in this study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new look at parenting through the cultural context: Development and initial psychometric evidence of the Interculturally Sensitive Parenting Scale (ISPAS)\",\"authors\":\"Ali Karababa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.101966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study aimed to evaluate the measurement characteristics of a newly developed scale to assess interculturally sensitive parenting for mothers and fathers of children and adolescents ranging from 4 to 18 years of age. The development of the Interculturally Sensitive Parenting Scale (ISPAS) ended up with five separate samples, with a total of 1522 parents (884 mothers and 638 fathers), in a five-step process. In the first phase, we generated a pool with 28 items and received input from content experts (n = 5) and cognitive interviews (n = 10), resulting in 23 items. In Study 2 (n = 602), which included inter-item and item-total correlations, eigenvalues, exploratory factor analysis, scree plots, and parallel analysis, six more items were excluded from the item pool, resulting in a one-dimensional construct with 17 items. In Study 3 (n = 607), along with parenting role (mother and father) invariance, confirmatory factor analysis supported the single-factor construct with 17 items, with excellent internal consistency with a high Cronbach's alpha. In Study 4 (n = 303), the analyses indicated that the ISPAS with a one-dimensional construct had good discriminant and convergent validity. Lastly, the 4-week test-retest reliability analysis of the ISPAS in Study 5 (n = 204) supported the stability of the measure. Taken together, the findings validated the usage of the 17-item ISPAS in reliably assessing mothers' and fathers' interculturally sensitive parenting. We hope academics from different disciplines, practitioners, mental health professionals, and educators will benefit from the assessment of the ISPAS presented in this study.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Intercultural Relations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Intercultural Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014717672400035X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014717672400035X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估新开发的量表的测量特性,该量表用于评估母亲和父亲对 4 至 18 岁儿童和青少年的跨文化敏感养育问题。跨文化教养敏感度量表(ISPAS)的编制工作分五个步骤进行,最终共收集了 1522 名父母(884 名母亲和 638 名父亲)的五个独立样本。在第一阶段,我们生成了一个包含 28 个项目的项目库,并听取了内容专家(n = 5)和认知访谈(n = 10)的意见,最终生成了 23 个项目。研究 2(n = 602)包括项目间和项目总相关性、特征值、探索性因素分析、scree plots 和平行分析,项目库中又排除了 6 个项目,最终形成了一个包含 17 个项目的一维结构。在研究 3(n = 607)中,随着养育角色(母亲和父亲)的不变性,确认性因素分析支持了有 17 个项目的单因素结构,其内部一致性极佳,具有较高的 Cronbach's alpha。在研究 4(n = 303)中,分析表明 ISPAS 的一维结构具有良好的判别效度和收敛效度。最后,研究 5(n = 204)对 ISPAS 进行的 4 周测试-再测试信度分析支持了该测量方法的稳定性。综上所述,研究结果验证了使用 17 个项目的 ISPAS 可以可靠地评估母亲和父亲的跨文化敏感养育情况。我们希望来自不同学科的学者、从业人员、心理健康专业人员和教育工作者都能从本研究对 ISPAS 的评估中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A new look at parenting through the cultural context: Development and initial psychometric evidence of the Interculturally Sensitive Parenting Scale (ISPAS)

This study aimed to evaluate the measurement characteristics of a newly developed scale to assess interculturally sensitive parenting for mothers and fathers of children and adolescents ranging from 4 to 18 years of age. The development of the Interculturally Sensitive Parenting Scale (ISPAS) ended up with five separate samples, with a total of 1522 parents (884 mothers and 638 fathers), in a five-step process. In the first phase, we generated a pool with 28 items and received input from content experts (n = 5) and cognitive interviews (n = 10), resulting in 23 items. In Study 2 (n = 602), which included inter-item and item-total correlations, eigenvalues, exploratory factor analysis, scree plots, and parallel analysis, six more items were excluded from the item pool, resulting in a one-dimensional construct with 17 items. In Study 3 (n = 607), along with parenting role (mother and father) invariance, confirmatory factor analysis supported the single-factor construct with 17 items, with excellent internal consistency with a high Cronbach's alpha. In Study 4 (n = 303), the analyses indicated that the ISPAS with a one-dimensional construct had good discriminant and convergent validity. Lastly, the 4-week test-retest reliability analysis of the ISPAS in Study 5 (n = 204) supported the stability of the measure. Taken together, the findings validated the usage of the 17-item ISPAS in reliably assessing mothers' and fathers' interculturally sensitive parenting. We hope academics from different disciplines, practitioners, mental health professionals, and educators will benefit from the assessment of the ISPAS presented in this study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.
期刊最新文献
Academic adaptation of international students in the chinese higher education environment: A case study with mixed methods Bright and dark sides: Does collective behavior past participation experience affect participation willingness? Sense of belongingness, discrimination, and mental health: Associations and buffering effects of sense of belonging on mental health among Finnish native and immigrant-origin youth Sea turtles stranded ashore: Sociocultural dissonance and identity conflicts in migration intentions of Chinese international student returnees 50+ years of psychological acculturation research: Progress and challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1