心电图和心脏磁共振成像在评估法洛氏四联症修复成人心室肥厚和扩张方面的相关性

IF 0.8 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ijcchd.2024.100508
Shanjot Brar , Mehima Kang , Amit Sodhi , Marc W. Deyell , Zachary Laksman , Jason G. Andrade , Matthew T. Bennett , Andrew D. Krahn , John Yeung-Lai-Wah , Richard G. Bennett , Amanda Barlow , Jasmine Grewal , Gnalini Sathananthan , Santabhanu Chakrabarti
{"title":"心电图和心脏磁共振成像在评估法洛氏四联症修复成人心室肥厚和扩张方面的相关性","authors":"Shanjot Brar ,&nbsp;Mehima Kang ,&nbsp;Amit Sodhi ,&nbsp;Marc W. Deyell ,&nbsp;Zachary Laksman ,&nbsp;Jason G. Andrade ,&nbsp;Matthew T. Bennett ,&nbsp;Andrew D. Krahn ,&nbsp;John Yeung-Lai-Wah ,&nbsp;Richard G. Bennett ,&nbsp;Amanda Barlow ,&nbsp;Jasmine Grewal ,&nbsp;Gnalini Sathananthan ,&nbsp;Santabhanu Chakrabarti","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcchd.2024.100508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Surgically repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) is associated with progressive right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) and dilation (RVD). Accurate estimation of RVH/RVD is vital for the ongoing management of this patient population. The utility of the ECG in evaluating patients with rTOF with pre-existing right bundle branch block (RBBB) has not been studied. We aimed to determine the sensitivity/specificity of currently established ECG criteria in detecting RVH/RVD in this patient population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We included consecutive patients diagnosed with rTOF who underwent CMR performed at our regional referral centre between January 2012 and December 2019. Each CMR was assessed for LVH, LVD, RVH and or RVD. The ECG corresponding to the CMR was then used to determine RVH/LVH for specificity and sensitivity analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our study included 163 consecutive rTOF patients. The specificity for ECG-based criteria for LVH was 100.00% (95% C.I. (87.75, 100.00)), and the sensitivity was 7.19% (95% C.I. (3.15, 12.83)). When RBBB was present, specificity for RVH was 100.00% (95% C.I. (84.56, 100.00)), and sensitivity was 7.69% (95% C.I. (3.75, 13.69)). When RBBB was absent, specificity for RVH was 100.00% (95% C.I. (15.81, 100.00)), and sensitivity was 0.00% (95% C.I. (0.00, 33.63)). A regression model with the entire group of 163 ToF patients, based on the Sokolow-Lyon criterion (sum of R in V1 + S in V5/V6), produced a new suggested criterion for the diagnosis of RVH in patients with rTOF, which was a sum of R in V1 + S in V5/V6 greater than 13.25 mm. This model's sensitivity for RVH detection was 69.1%, and specificity was 36.8%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Standard ECG voltage criteria have poor sensitivity for detecting right and left ventricular chamber hypertrophy and dilatation in patients with rTOF, so current ECG criteria should not be used to monitor RVH/RVD in this patient population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73429,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266666852400017X/pdfft?md5=fd9190da352f0bf1c64cf1ebf8d13520&pid=1-s2.0-S266666852400017X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation of ECG and cardiac MRI for assessment of ventricular hypertrophy and dilatation in adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot\",\"authors\":\"Shanjot Brar ,&nbsp;Mehima Kang ,&nbsp;Amit Sodhi ,&nbsp;Marc W. Deyell ,&nbsp;Zachary Laksman ,&nbsp;Jason G. Andrade ,&nbsp;Matthew T. Bennett ,&nbsp;Andrew D. Krahn ,&nbsp;John Yeung-Lai-Wah ,&nbsp;Richard G. Bennett ,&nbsp;Amanda Barlow ,&nbsp;Jasmine Grewal ,&nbsp;Gnalini Sathananthan ,&nbsp;Santabhanu Chakrabarti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijcchd.2024.100508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Surgically repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) is associated with progressive right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) and dilation (RVD). Accurate estimation of RVH/RVD is vital for the ongoing management of this patient population. The utility of the ECG in evaluating patients with rTOF with pre-existing right bundle branch block (RBBB) has not been studied. We aimed to determine the sensitivity/specificity of currently established ECG criteria in detecting RVH/RVD in this patient population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We included consecutive patients diagnosed with rTOF who underwent CMR performed at our regional referral centre between January 2012 and December 2019. Each CMR was assessed for LVH, LVD, RVH and or RVD. The ECG corresponding to the CMR was then used to determine RVH/LVH for specificity and sensitivity analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our study included 163 consecutive rTOF patients. The specificity for ECG-based criteria for LVH was 100.00% (95% C.I. (87.75, 100.00)), and the sensitivity was 7.19% (95% C.I. (3.15, 12.83)). When RBBB was present, specificity for RVH was 100.00% (95% C.I. (84.56, 100.00)), and sensitivity was 7.69% (95% C.I. (3.75, 13.69)). When RBBB was absent, specificity for RVH was 100.00% (95% C.I. (15.81, 100.00)), and sensitivity was 0.00% (95% C.I. (0.00, 33.63)). A regression model with the entire group of 163 ToF patients, based on the Sokolow-Lyon criterion (sum of R in V1 + S in V5/V6), produced a new suggested criterion for the diagnosis of RVH in patients with rTOF, which was a sum of R in V1 + S in V5/V6 greater than 13.25 mm. This model's sensitivity for RVH detection was 69.1%, and specificity was 36.8%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Standard ECG voltage criteria have poor sensitivity for detecting right and left ventricular chamber hypertrophy and dilatation in patients with rTOF, so current ECG criteria should not be used to monitor RVH/RVD in this patient population.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266666852400017X/pdfft?md5=fd9190da352f0bf1c64cf1ebf8d13520&pid=1-s2.0-S266666852400017X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266666852400017X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266666852400017X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景经手术修复的法洛氏四联症(rTOF)与进行性右心室肥厚(RVH)和扩张(RVD)有关。准确评估 RVH/RVD 对持续管理这类患者至关重要。心电图在评估已存在右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)的 rTOF 患者中的实用性尚未得到研究。我们的目的是确定目前已建立的心电图标准在检测该患者人群中 RVH/RVD 的敏感性/特异性。方法我们纳入了 2012 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间在我们的地区转诊中心接受 CMR 检查的连续确诊为 rTOF 患者。每张 CMR 都要评估 LVH、LVD、RVH 或 RVD。然后使用与 CMR 相对应的心电图来确定 RVH/LVH,以进行特异性和敏感性分析。基于心电图的 LVH 标准的特异性为 100.00%(95% C.I. (87.75, 100.00)),灵敏度为 7.19%(95% C.I. (3.15, 12.83))。当出现 RBBB 时,RVH 的特异性为 100.00% (95% C.I. (84.56, 100.00)),灵敏度为 7.69% (95% C.I. (3.75, 13.69))。当 RBBB 缺失时,RVH 的特异性为 100.00% (95% C.I. (15.81, 100.00)),灵敏度为 0.00% (95% C.I. (0.00, 33.63))。根据 Sokolow-Lyon 标准(V5/V6 中 V1 + S 的 R 之和)对 163 名 ToF 患者进行回归建模,得出了诊断 rTOF 患者 RVH 的新标准,即 V5/V6 中 V1 + S 的 R 之和大于 13.25 mm。结论标准的心电图电压标准对检测 rTOF 患者左右心室腔肥厚和扩张的敏感性较差,因此目前的心电图标准不应被用于监测该患者群体的 RVH/RVD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Correlation of ECG and cardiac MRI for assessment of ventricular hypertrophy and dilatation in adults with repaired tetralogy of Fallot

Background

Surgically repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) is associated with progressive right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) and dilation (RVD). Accurate estimation of RVH/RVD is vital for the ongoing management of this patient population. The utility of the ECG in evaluating patients with rTOF with pre-existing right bundle branch block (RBBB) has not been studied. We aimed to determine the sensitivity/specificity of currently established ECG criteria in detecting RVH/RVD in this patient population.

Methods

We included consecutive patients diagnosed with rTOF who underwent CMR performed at our regional referral centre between January 2012 and December 2019. Each CMR was assessed for LVH, LVD, RVH and or RVD. The ECG corresponding to the CMR was then used to determine RVH/LVH for specificity and sensitivity analysis.

Results

Our study included 163 consecutive rTOF patients. The specificity for ECG-based criteria for LVH was 100.00% (95% C.I. (87.75, 100.00)), and the sensitivity was 7.19% (95% C.I. (3.15, 12.83)). When RBBB was present, specificity for RVH was 100.00% (95% C.I. (84.56, 100.00)), and sensitivity was 7.69% (95% C.I. (3.75, 13.69)). When RBBB was absent, specificity for RVH was 100.00% (95% C.I. (15.81, 100.00)), and sensitivity was 0.00% (95% C.I. (0.00, 33.63)). A regression model with the entire group of 163 ToF patients, based on the Sokolow-Lyon criterion (sum of R in V1 + S in V5/V6), produced a new suggested criterion for the diagnosis of RVH in patients with rTOF, which was a sum of R in V1 + S in V5/V6 greater than 13.25 mm. This model's sensitivity for RVH detection was 69.1%, and specificity was 36.8%.

Conclusions

Standard ECG voltage criteria have poor sensitivity for detecting right and left ventricular chamber hypertrophy and dilatation in patients with rTOF, so current ECG criteria should not be used to monitor RVH/RVD in this patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease
International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
期刊最新文献
Novel techniques for quantifying oxygen pulse curve characteristics during cardiopulmonary exercise testing in tetralogy of fallot Corrigendum to “Exercise ventilatory reserve predicts survival in adult congenital heart disease associated pulmonary arterial hypertension with Eisenmenger physiology” [Int J Cardiol Congenit Heart Dis, Volume 7, March 2022, 100331] Corrigendum to [Int J Cardiol Congenit Heart Dis 9 September 2022 100394] A national Australian Congenital Heart Disease registry; methods and initial results Imaging in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease: Current practice and advances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1