民间社会与司法机构之间公共关系的法律界限

M. Blikhar, Radoslav Jankal
{"title":"民间社会与司法机构之间公共关系的法律界限","authors":"M. Blikhar, Radoslav Jankal","doi":"10.55643/ser.1.51.2024.555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation procedure of the judiciary in the modern conditions of the relationship between civil society and the rule of law occupies a key place because the modern conditions for the formation of such relationships emphasize the struggle for the rule of law and the independence of judges. Within the framework of the study, it was found that the relationship between civil society and the rule of law implements the established system of checks and balances in ensuring the balance of social relations (including the recognition of lawful behavior as a perceived necessity) in general and the protection of individuals from the arbitrariness of authorities in particular. Therefore, in this context, the influential importance of the judiciary is given its ability to fully protect the violated rights of the individual and the interests of the state within the framework of the legal field. At the same time, it is necessary to state that the state and civil society, within the limits of their mutual relations, have certain regulatory and control functions regarding the activities of the judiciary. In such a case, the relationship between the state and civil society within the framework of the evaluation procedure of the judiciary's activity should be interpreted as a system that performs specific functions in order to characterize the presence of interconnected elements with clearly defined forms of relationships. At most, these relationships contain a number of specific elements, among which are the following: subjects of interaction, objects of interaction, mutual relations between subjects, and changes caused by the interaction of subjects. It is substantiated that the key feature of the court within the framework of the relationship between civil society and the rule of law is primarily the independence of the court through the independence of judges. The definition of the concept of \"independent judge\" is proposed, according to which such a judge is a highly qualified specialist who in his practical activities acts exclusively on the basis of the law, making unbiased legal decisions, relying on the requirements of regulatory legal acts, regardless of possible benefit for himself. In turn, the relationship between civil society and judicial authorities has a direct impact on increasing the efficiency of court work through the establishment of the principle of the rule of law, helping to ensure the independence of judges on the one hand, and increasing the level of legal awareness and legal culture of the population on the other hand.","PeriodicalId":108264,"journal":{"name":"Socio-economic relations in the digital society","volume":"36 46","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ПРАВОВІ МЕЖІ СУСПІЛЬНИХ ВІДНОСИН МІЖ ГРОМАДЯНСЬКИМ СУСПІЛЬСТВОМ ТА ОРГАНАМИ СУДОВОЇ ВЛАДИ\",\"authors\":\"M. Blikhar, Radoslav Jankal\",\"doi\":\"10.55643/ser.1.51.2024.555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The evaluation procedure of the judiciary in the modern conditions of the relationship between civil society and the rule of law occupies a key place because the modern conditions for the formation of such relationships emphasize the struggle for the rule of law and the independence of judges. Within the framework of the study, it was found that the relationship between civil society and the rule of law implements the established system of checks and balances in ensuring the balance of social relations (including the recognition of lawful behavior as a perceived necessity) in general and the protection of individuals from the arbitrariness of authorities in particular. Therefore, in this context, the influential importance of the judiciary is given its ability to fully protect the violated rights of the individual and the interests of the state within the framework of the legal field. At the same time, it is necessary to state that the state and civil society, within the limits of their mutual relations, have certain regulatory and control functions regarding the activities of the judiciary. In such a case, the relationship between the state and civil society within the framework of the evaluation procedure of the judiciary's activity should be interpreted as a system that performs specific functions in order to characterize the presence of interconnected elements with clearly defined forms of relationships. At most, these relationships contain a number of specific elements, among which are the following: subjects of interaction, objects of interaction, mutual relations between subjects, and changes caused by the interaction of subjects. It is substantiated that the key feature of the court within the framework of the relationship between civil society and the rule of law is primarily the independence of the court through the independence of judges. The definition of the concept of \\\"independent judge\\\" is proposed, according to which such a judge is a highly qualified specialist who in his practical activities acts exclusively on the basis of the law, making unbiased legal decisions, relying on the requirements of regulatory legal acts, regardless of possible benefit for himself. In turn, the relationship between civil society and judicial authorities has a direct impact on increasing the efficiency of court work through the establishment of the principle of the rule of law, helping to ensure the independence of judges on the one hand, and increasing the level of legal awareness and legal culture of the population on the other hand.\",\"PeriodicalId\":108264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socio-economic relations in the digital society\",\"volume\":\"36 46\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socio-economic relations in the digital society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55643/ser.1.51.2024.555\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socio-economic relations in the digital society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55643/ser.1.51.2024.555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在公民社会与法治关系的现代条件下,司法机构的评估程序占有重要地位,因为形成这种关系的现代条件强调为法治和法官的独立性而斗争。在研究框架内发现,公民社会与法治之间的关系落实了既定的制衡制度,从总体上确保了社会关系的平衡(包括承认合法行为的必要性),特别是保护个人免受当局专横跋扈之害。因此,在这种情况下,司法机构的重要影响在于它有能力在法律领域的框架内充分保护被侵犯的个人权利和国家利益。同时,有必要指出,国家和民间社会在其相互关系的范围内,对司法机构的活动具有一定的监管和控制职能。在这种情况下,国家与民间社会在司法机构活动评估程序框架内的关系应被解释为一个履行特定职能的系统,以描述具有明确关系形式的相互关联要素的存在。这些关系最多包含若干具体要素,其中包括:互动的主体、互动的客体、主体之间的相互关系以及主体互动引起的变化。事实证明,在公民社会与法治关系的框架内,法院的关键特征主要是通过法官的独立性实现法院的独立性。提出了 "独立法官 "概念的定义,根据该定义,独立法官是高素质的专家,在其实际活动中完全以法律为依据,根据规范性法案的要求做出公正的法律裁决,而不考虑自身可能获得的利益。反过来,民间社会与司法当局之间的关系对通过建立法治原则提高法院工作效率具有直接影响,一方面有助于确保法官的独立性,另一方面有助于提高民众的法律意识和法律文化水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ПРАВОВІ МЕЖІ СУСПІЛЬНИХ ВІДНОСИН МІЖ ГРОМАДЯНСЬКИМ СУСПІЛЬСТВОМ ТА ОРГАНАМИ СУДОВОЇ ВЛАДИ
The evaluation procedure of the judiciary in the modern conditions of the relationship between civil society and the rule of law occupies a key place because the modern conditions for the formation of such relationships emphasize the struggle for the rule of law and the independence of judges. Within the framework of the study, it was found that the relationship between civil society and the rule of law implements the established system of checks and balances in ensuring the balance of social relations (including the recognition of lawful behavior as a perceived necessity) in general and the protection of individuals from the arbitrariness of authorities in particular. Therefore, in this context, the influential importance of the judiciary is given its ability to fully protect the violated rights of the individual and the interests of the state within the framework of the legal field. At the same time, it is necessary to state that the state and civil society, within the limits of their mutual relations, have certain regulatory and control functions regarding the activities of the judiciary. In such a case, the relationship between the state and civil society within the framework of the evaluation procedure of the judiciary's activity should be interpreted as a system that performs specific functions in order to characterize the presence of interconnected elements with clearly defined forms of relationships. At most, these relationships contain a number of specific elements, among which are the following: subjects of interaction, objects of interaction, mutual relations between subjects, and changes caused by the interaction of subjects. It is substantiated that the key feature of the court within the framework of the relationship between civil society and the rule of law is primarily the independence of the court through the independence of judges. The definition of the concept of "independent judge" is proposed, according to which such a judge is a highly qualified specialist who in his practical activities acts exclusively on the basis of the law, making unbiased legal decisions, relying on the requirements of regulatory legal acts, regardless of possible benefit for himself. In turn, the relationship between civil society and judicial authorities has a direct impact on increasing the efficiency of court work through the establishment of the principle of the rule of law, helping to ensure the independence of judges on the one hand, and increasing the level of legal awareness and legal culture of the population on the other hand.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF METHODS FOR ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF OPERATIONAL RISK ON BANKS' CAPITAL ПРАВОВЕ РЕГУЛЮВАННЯ ЕЛЕКТРОННОЇ ІДЕНТИФІКАЦІЇ ТА ЕЛЕКТРОННИХ ДОВІРЧИХ ПОСЛУГ В УКРАЇНІ: ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ ВДОСКОНАЛЕННЯ Й РОЗВИТКУ В УМОВАХ ГАРМОНІЗАЦІЇ З ПРАВОМ ЄВРОПЕЙСЬКОГО СОЮЗУ INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT FOR ATTRACTING AND REALIZING INVESTMENTS IN THE ENERGY SECTOR OF UKRAINE MODERN CHALLENGES AND THREATS TO INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES OF UKRAINIAN ENTERPRISES ПРАВОВІ МЕЖІ СУСПІЛЬНИХ ВІДНОСИН МІЖ ГРОМАДЯНСЬКИМ СУСПІЛЬСТВОМ ТА ОРГАНАМИ СУДОВОЇ ВЛАДИ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1