新型肩部损伤/手术后重返赛场电池:标准值和心理测量特性

Kieron Phillips, Jun Xiang Ng, Tarek Abdelkader, Alex Wirianski
{"title":"新型肩部损伤/手术后重返赛场电池:标准值和心理测量特性","authors":"Kieron Phillips, Jun Xiang Ng, Tarek Abdelkader, Alex Wirianski","doi":"10.1177/22104917231225969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The Singapore Institute of Technology Shoulder Assessment Battery (SIT-SAB) is a novel shoulder test battery involving six different tests. It is created to aid clinicians in the return-to-play decision-making process. This study aims to establish the normative score for the SIT-SAB and assess the reliability of its scoring criteria. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study looked at healthy adults aged 18 or older with asymptomatic shoulders and normal shoulder mobility were recruited for the study. The participants performed all the tests in the SIT-SAB, and the measurements and scores obtained were recorded. Nineteen participants returned for two additional sessions on separate days to analyse the SIT-SAB's reliability. The inter-rater, intra-rater and test–retest reliability was calculated using a two-way mixed effect International Consensus Criteria (ICC) model. The ICC coefficient and the 95% confidence interval were used to determine the reliability of the SIT-SAB. Results: The SIT-SAB demonstrated good inter-rater, intra-rater and inter-day reliability (ICC  =  0.81 (0.51–0.93), 0.97 (0.92–0.99), 0.89 (0.78–0.96), respectively) and has a mean score of 87.3  ±  10.3. The SIT-SAB scores were not correlated with any demographic, anthropometric characteristics or other factors. Conclusion: The findings provided the normative score to be expected of a healthy Singaporean adult and showed that the scoring criteria used were stable and demonstrated good reliability. Further research is needed to establish the cut-off score required for a safe return-to-play.","PeriodicalId":517288,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation","volume":"67 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel return-to-play battery for shoulder injury/surgery: Normative values and psychometric properties\",\"authors\":\"Kieron Phillips, Jun Xiang Ng, Tarek Abdelkader, Alex Wirianski\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/22104917231225969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The Singapore Institute of Technology Shoulder Assessment Battery (SIT-SAB) is a novel shoulder test battery involving six different tests. It is created to aid clinicians in the return-to-play decision-making process. This study aims to establish the normative score for the SIT-SAB and assess the reliability of its scoring criteria. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study looked at healthy adults aged 18 or older with asymptomatic shoulders and normal shoulder mobility were recruited for the study. The participants performed all the tests in the SIT-SAB, and the measurements and scores obtained were recorded. Nineteen participants returned for two additional sessions on separate days to analyse the SIT-SAB's reliability. The inter-rater, intra-rater and test–retest reliability was calculated using a two-way mixed effect International Consensus Criteria (ICC) model. The ICC coefficient and the 95% confidence interval were used to determine the reliability of the SIT-SAB. Results: The SIT-SAB demonstrated good inter-rater, intra-rater and inter-day reliability (ICC  =  0.81 (0.51–0.93), 0.97 (0.92–0.99), 0.89 (0.78–0.96), respectively) and has a mean score of 87.3  ±  10.3. The SIT-SAB scores were not correlated with any demographic, anthropometric characteristics or other factors. Conclusion: The findings provided the normative score to be expected of a healthy Singaporean adult and showed that the scoring criteria used were stable and demonstrated good reliability. Further research is needed to establish the cut-off score required for a safe return-to-play.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"67 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917231225969\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917231225969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:新加坡科技学院肩关节评估电池(SIT-SAB)是一种新型的肩关节测试电池,包括六种不同的测试。该测试旨在帮助临床医生做出重返赛场的决策。本研究旨在确定 SIT-SAB 的标准分,并评估其评分标准的可靠性。方法:这项横断面观察性研究招募了年龄在 18 岁或 18 岁以上、肩部无症状且肩部活动度正常的健康成年人参与研究。参与者进行了 SIT-SAB 中的所有测试,并记录了测量结果和分数。为了分析 SIT-SAB 的可靠性,19 名参与者在不同的日期又进行了两次测试。使用双向混合效应国际共识标准(ICC)模型计算了评分者之间、评分者内部和测试-再测的可靠性。ICC 系数和 95% 置信区间用于确定 SIT-SAB 的可靠性。结果:SIT-SAB 在施测者之间、施测者内部和施测日之间均表现出良好的可靠性(ICC = 0.81 (0.51-0.93)、0.97 (0.92-0.99)、0.89 (0.78-0.96)),平均得分为 87.3 ± 10.3。SIT-SAB 评分与任何人口统计学、人体测量特征或其他因素均无相关性。结论研究结果为健康的新加坡成年人提供了标准分数,并表明所使用的评分标准稳定可靠。还需要进一步研究,以确定安全重返赛场所需的临界分数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A novel return-to-play battery for shoulder injury/surgery: Normative values and psychometric properties
Objective: The Singapore Institute of Technology Shoulder Assessment Battery (SIT-SAB) is a novel shoulder test battery involving six different tests. It is created to aid clinicians in the return-to-play decision-making process. This study aims to establish the normative score for the SIT-SAB and assess the reliability of its scoring criteria. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study looked at healthy adults aged 18 or older with asymptomatic shoulders and normal shoulder mobility were recruited for the study. The participants performed all the tests in the SIT-SAB, and the measurements and scores obtained were recorded. Nineteen participants returned for two additional sessions on separate days to analyse the SIT-SAB's reliability. The inter-rater, intra-rater and test–retest reliability was calculated using a two-way mixed effect International Consensus Criteria (ICC) model. The ICC coefficient and the 95% confidence interval were used to determine the reliability of the SIT-SAB. Results: The SIT-SAB demonstrated good inter-rater, intra-rater and inter-day reliability (ICC  =  0.81 (0.51–0.93), 0.97 (0.92–0.99), 0.89 (0.78–0.96), respectively) and has a mean score of 87.3  ±  10.3. The SIT-SAB scores were not correlated with any demographic, anthropometric characteristics or other factors. Conclusion: The findings provided the normative score to be expected of a healthy Singaporean adult and showed that the scoring criteria used were stable and demonstrated good reliability. Further research is needed to establish the cut-off score required for a safe return-to-play.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Retrospective evaluation of the short-term effectiveness of non-enzymatically isolated stromal vascular fraction cells in patients with knee osteoarthritis Comparison of Kleinert versus Saint John protocol in Zone I/II flexor tendon injuries: A retrospective study Factors affecting decreased walking ability in patients with conservatively treated fragility fracture of the pelvic ring Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia by orthopaedic surgeons in fixation of distal radius fracture Comparative outcome of different treatment options for acetabulum fractures in elderly individuals—a retrospective analysis of 207 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1