网络空间中的道德:阿尔-加扎利眼中的在线乞讨法

Nuraini, Nasrulloh, Hamidatul Latifah, Rizka Qurrota Ayuni, Puji Kastrawi
{"title":"网络空间中的道德:阿尔-加扎利眼中的在线乞讨法","authors":"Nuraini, Nasrulloh, Hamidatul Latifah, Rizka Qurrota Ayuni, Puji Kastrawi","doi":"10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i1.7577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of controversy programs on live Tik Tok is very detrimental to various parties. One of them is the trend of begging online to generate massive rupiah coffers. Open-access digital platforms should require users to be careful because they become public consumption. In fact, this application is used to beg openly and even display the user's name and face. This study aims to analyze the phenomenon of online begging from the live Tik Tok perspective of Imam Al Ghazali. This research method is qualitative research with a focus on literature research. The data analysis used in this study is descriptive qualitative analysis. The result is that begging online is haram because it is deceitful and takes advantage of certain circumstances to get as many gifts as possible. This is evidenced by the aqli arguments about begging, the impact of online begging on live Tik Tok, and Imam Al Ghazali's perspective regarding begging.","PeriodicalId":507894,"journal":{"name":"Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moralitas di Dunia Maya: Hukum Mengemis Online Live Tik Tok dalam Perspektif Al-Ghazali\",\"authors\":\"Nuraini, Nasrulloh, Hamidatul Latifah, Rizka Qurrota Ayuni, Puji Kastrawi\",\"doi\":\"10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i1.7577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rise of controversy programs on live Tik Tok is very detrimental to various parties. One of them is the trend of begging online to generate massive rupiah coffers. Open-access digital platforms should require users to be careful because they become public consumption. In fact, this application is used to beg openly and even display the user's name and face. This study aims to analyze the phenomenon of online begging from the live Tik Tok perspective of Imam Al Ghazali. This research method is qualitative research with a focus on literature research. The data analysis used in this study is descriptive qualitative analysis. The result is that begging online is haram because it is deceitful and takes advantage of certain circumstances to get as many gifts as possible. This is evidenced by the aqli arguments about begging, the impact of online begging on live Tik Tok, and Imam Al Ghazali's perspective regarding begging.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i1.7577\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i1.7577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Tik Tok 直播争议节目的兴起对各方都非常不利。其中之一就是网上乞讨的趋势,以获得大量印尼盾。开放访问的数字平台应要求用户小心谨慎,因为它们已成为公共消费。事实上,这种应用程序被用来公开乞讨,甚至显示用户的姓名和面孔。本研究旨在从伊玛目-阿尔-加扎利的 Tik Tok 直播视角分析网上乞讨现象。本研究方法为定性研究,侧重于文献研究。本研究采用的数据分析是描述性定性分析。研究结果表明,网上乞讨是可憎的,因为它具有欺骗性,并利用某些情况获得尽可能多的礼物。关于乞讨的 aqli 论点、在线乞讨对 Tik Tok 直播的影响以及伊玛目 Al Ghazali 关于乞讨的观点都证明了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Moralitas di Dunia Maya: Hukum Mengemis Online Live Tik Tok dalam Perspektif Al-Ghazali
The rise of controversy programs on live Tik Tok is very detrimental to various parties. One of them is the trend of begging online to generate massive rupiah coffers. Open-access digital platforms should require users to be careful because they become public consumption. In fact, this application is used to beg openly and even display the user's name and face. This study aims to analyze the phenomenon of online begging from the live Tik Tok perspective of Imam Al Ghazali. This research method is qualitative research with a focus on literature research. The data analysis used in this study is descriptive qualitative analysis. The result is that begging online is haram because it is deceitful and takes advantage of certain circumstances to get as many gifts as possible. This is evidenced by the aqli arguments about begging, the impact of online begging on live Tik Tok, and Imam Al Ghazali's perspective regarding begging.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ibnu Taimiyah and Qurais Shihab's Views on the Law of Electing Non-Muslim Leaders: A Comparative Study Rajah dan Spiritualitas Lokal dalam Hukum Islam; Studi Analisis Tafsir Hermeneutik Disparitas Desentralisasi; Konsepsi Otonomi Daerah Khusus Ibukota terhadap Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Moralitas di Dunia Maya: Hukum Mengemis Online Live Tik Tok dalam Perspektif Al-Ghazali Progressiveness of Sharia Insurance as A Component of The Islamic Non-Bank Financial Industry in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1