{"title":"学术相关性的可疑焦虑","authors":"K. M. Simmons","doi":"10.1177/00084298241240682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on comments made as part of a plenary roundtable at the 2023 annual meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study of Religion, this brief essay examines the discourse on the public relevance of religious studies scholarship. Specifically, it identifies the anxieties present in such discussions and the false theory–praxis binary on which they rely.","PeriodicalId":514407,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","volume":"124 44","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The dubious anxiety of scholarly relevance\",\"authors\":\"K. M. Simmons\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00084298241240682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on comments made as part of a plenary roundtable at the 2023 annual meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study of Religion, this brief essay examines the discourse on the public relevance of religious studies scholarship. Specifically, it identifies the anxieties present in such discussions and the false theory–praxis binary on which they rely.\",\"PeriodicalId\":514407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses\",\"volume\":\"124 44\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00084298241240682\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00084298241240682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
根据加拿大宗教研究学会（Canadian Society for the Study of Religion）2023 年年会全体圆桌会议上的发言，这篇短文探讨了关于宗教研究学术的公共相关性的讨论。具体而言，它指出了这些讨论中存在的焦虑以及它们所依赖的错误的理论-实践二元论。
Based on comments made as part of a plenary roundtable at the 2023 annual meeting of the Canadian Society for the Study of Religion, this brief essay examines the discourse on the public relevance of religious studies scholarship. Specifically, it identifies the anxieties present in such discussions and the false theory–praxis binary on which they rely.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
