埃利亚斯-马格努斯-弗里斯(Elias Magnus Fries)的真菌 "Scleromyceti Sueciae":晦涩难懂的 "第九分册 "的新发现

IF 3 2区 生物学 Q2 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY Taxon Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1002/tax.13168
J. Karakehian, Donald H. Pfister, A.N. Miller
{"title":"埃利亚斯-马格努斯-弗里斯(Elias Magnus Fries)的真菌 \"Scleromyceti Sueciae\":晦涩难懂的 \"第九分册 \"的新发现","authors":"J. Karakehian, Donald H. Pfister, A.N. Miller","doi":"10.1002/tax.13168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Elias Magnus Fries's fungus exsiccati Scleromyceti Sueciae documents specimens cited in several of Fries's publications that are now considered sanctioning works in the nomenclature and taxonomy of several groups of fungi. The first eight fascicles of the first edition of the Scleromyceti Sueciae were issued periodically during the years 1819–1822. Each fascicle was issued as a bound booklet that included, among other information, a printed title page with a date, and an index followed by 30–40 specimens. A ninth fascicle that concluded the first edition was issued without a date. Scholars of the Scleromyceti Sueciae inferred an approximate date of issuance of mid‐1825 based on Fries's correspondence, but they were uncertain whether fascicle nine was issued as a booklet or on loose sheets. In addition, the location of the printed index to fascicle nine that they studied was unclear. We obtained images of a complete, original copy of fascicle nine from the collections of the Natural History Museum of Denmark of the University of Copenhagen. This copy proves that fascicle nine was issued as a bound booklet like the previous eight fascicles and contained a printed index and printed specimen labels. Because of the apparent rarity of a complete, original copy of fascicle nine, we describe the copy at the Natural History Museum of Denmark and provide images of the index. We discuss potential problems in typifying names from material issued in the Scleromyceti Sueciae second edition. Using an example from fascicle nine, we discuss Fries's omissions, errors, and lapses in citing specimens.","PeriodicalId":49448,"journal":{"name":"Taxon","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elias Magnus Fries's fungus exsiccati Scleromyceti Sueciae: New light on the obscure “fascicle nine”\",\"authors\":\"J. Karakehian, Donald H. Pfister, A.N. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tax.13168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Elias Magnus Fries's fungus exsiccati Scleromyceti Sueciae documents specimens cited in several of Fries's publications that are now considered sanctioning works in the nomenclature and taxonomy of several groups of fungi. The first eight fascicles of the first edition of the Scleromyceti Sueciae were issued periodically during the years 1819–1822. Each fascicle was issued as a bound booklet that included, among other information, a printed title page with a date, and an index followed by 30–40 specimens. A ninth fascicle that concluded the first edition was issued without a date. Scholars of the Scleromyceti Sueciae inferred an approximate date of issuance of mid‐1825 based on Fries's correspondence, but they were uncertain whether fascicle nine was issued as a booklet or on loose sheets. In addition, the location of the printed index to fascicle nine that they studied was unclear. We obtained images of a complete, original copy of fascicle nine from the collections of the Natural History Museum of Denmark of the University of Copenhagen. This copy proves that fascicle nine was issued as a bound booklet like the previous eight fascicles and contained a printed index and printed specimen labels. Because of the apparent rarity of a complete, original copy of fascicle nine, we describe the copy at the Natural History Museum of Denmark and provide images of the index. We discuss potential problems in typifying names from material issued in the Scleromyceti Sueciae second edition. Using an example from fascicle nine, we discuss Fries's omissions, errors, and lapses in citing specimens.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Taxon\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Taxon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13168\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taxon","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

埃利亚斯-马格努斯-弗里斯(Elias Magnus Fries)的《Scleromyceti Sueciae》真菌外典记录了弗里斯几部出版物中引用的标本,这些出版物现在被认为是几类真菌命名和分类的权威著作。Scleromyceti Sueciae》第一版的前八册在 1819-1822 年间定期发行。每个分册都以装订成册的形式发行,除其他信息外,还包括印有日期的扉页和索引,以及 30-40 个标本。第九分册是第一版的结尾,没有日期。研究 Scleromyceti Sueciae 的学者根据弗里斯的通信推断出该书的发行日期大致为 1825 年中期,但他们无法确定第九分册是以小册子的形式发行还是以散页的形式发行。此外,他们研究的第九分册印刷索引的位置也不清楚。我们从哥本哈根大学丹麦自然历史博物馆的藏品中获得了一份完整的第九分册原件的图片。该副本证明,第九分册与前八分册一样是装订成册发行的,并包含印刷索引和印刷标本标签。由于第九分册的完整原件非常罕见,我们介绍了丹麦自然历史博物馆的副本,并提供了索引的图片。我们讨论了从 Scleromyceti Sueciae 第二版发行的材料中对名称进行分类的潜在问题。我们以第九分册为例,讨论了弗里斯在引用标本时的遗漏、错误和失误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Elias Magnus Fries's fungus exsiccati Scleromyceti Sueciae: New light on the obscure “fascicle nine”
Elias Magnus Fries's fungus exsiccati Scleromyceti Sueciae documents specimens cited in several of Fries's publications that are now considered sanctioning works in the nomenclature and taxonomy of several groups of fungi. The first eight fascicles of the first edition of the Scleromyceti Sueciae were issued periodically during the years 1819–1822. Each fascicle was issued as a bound booklet that included, among other information, a printed title page with a date, and an index followed by 30–40 specimens. A ninth fascicle that concluded the first edition was issued without a date. Scholars of the Scleromyceti Sueciae inferred an approximate date of issuance of mid‐1825 based on Fries's correspondence, but they were uncertain whether fascicle nine was issued as a booklet or on loose sheets. In addition, the location of the printed index to fascicle nine that they studied was unclear. We obtained images of a complete, original copy of fascicle nine from the collections of the Natural History Museum of Denmark of the University of Copenhagen. This copy proves that fascicle nine was issued as a bound booklet like the previous eight fascicles and contained a printed index and printed specimen labels. Because of the apparent rarity of a complete, original copy of fascicle nine, we describe the copy at the Natural History Museum of Denmark and provide images of the index. We discuss potential problems in typifying names from material issued in the Scleromyceti Sueciae second edition. Using an example from fascicle nine, we discuss Fries's omissions, errors, and lapses in citing specimens.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Taxon
Taxon 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
177
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: TAXON is the bi-monthly journal of the International Association for Plant Taxonomy and is devoted to systematic and evolutionary biology with emphasis on plants and fungi. It is published bimonthly by the International Bureau for Plant Taxonomy and Nomenclature, c/o Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK-845 23 Bratislava, SLOVAKIA. Details of page charges are given in the Guidelines for authors. Papers will be reviewed by at least two specialists.
期刊最新文献
IAPT chromosome data 42 Morphological and molecular analyses consistently support the existence of two species under Hypochaeris achyrophorus (Asteraceae, Cichorieae) Biogeographic, climatic, morphological, cytological and molecular data reveal a new diploid species from China in the genus Xanthocyparis (Cupressaceae) Species delimitation in Xanthium sect. Acanthoxanthium (Heliantheae, Asteraceae) and the neglected species Xanthium argenteum (3050) Proposal to reject the name Cistus pilosus (Cistaceae)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1