ChatGPT 与 Bard:对比研究

Imtiaz Ahmed, M. Kajol, Uzma Hasan, P. P. Datta, Ayon Roy, Md. Rokonuzzaman Reza
{"title":"ChatGPT 与 Bard:对比研究","authors":"Imtiaz Ahmed, M. Kajol, Uzma Hasan, P. P. Datta, Ayon Roy, Md. Rokonuzzaman Reza","doi":"10.1002/eng2.12890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid progress in conversational AI has given rise to advanced language models capable of generating human‐like texts. Among these models, ChatGPT and Bard, developed by OpenAI and Google AI respectively, have gained significant attention. With their wide range of functionalities, such as human‐like response generation, proficiency in professional exams, complex problem solving, and more, these models have captured interest. This study presents a comprehensive survey exploring and comparing the capabilities and features of ChatGPT and Bard. We delve into their architectures, training methodologies, performance evaluations, and limitations across various domains. Ethical considerations such as biases and potential misconduct are also examined. Our findings highlight ChatGPT's exceptional performance, positioning it as a leading model. This survey is a vital resource for scholars, innovators, and interested parties operating within the domain of conversational artificial intelligence, offering valuable insights for the advancement of cutting‐edge language models.","PeriodicalId":11735,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ChatGPT versus Bard: A comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Imtiaz Ahmed, M. Kajol, Uzma Hasan, P. P. Datta, Ayon Roy, Md. Rokonuzzaman Reza\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eng2.12890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rapid progress in conversational AI has given rise to advanced language models capable of generating human‐like texts. Among these models, ChatGPT and Bard, developed by OpenAI and Google AI respectively, have gained significant attention. With their wide range of functionalities, such as human‐like response generation, proficiency in professional exams, complex problem solving, and more, these models have captured interest. This study presents a comprehensive survey exploring and comparing the capabilities and features of ChatGPT and Bard. We delve into their architectures, training methodologies, performance evaluations, and limitations across various domains. Ethical considerations such as biases and potential misconduct are also examined. Our findings highlight ChatGPT's exceptional performance, positioning it as a leading model. This survey is a vital resource for scholars, innovators, and interested parties operating within the domain of conversational artificial intelligence, offering valuable insights for the advancement of cutting‐edge language models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12890\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对话式人工智能的快速发展催生了能够生成类人文本的高级语言模型。在这些模型中,分别由 OpenAI 和谷歌人工智能开发的 ChatGPT 和 Bard 引起了广泛关注。这些模型具有广泛的功能,如生成类人回复、精通专业考试、解决复杂问题等,因此备受关注。本研究对 ChatGPT 和 Bard 的功能和特点进行了全面的探讨和比较。我们深入探讨了它们在不同领域的架构、训练方法、性能评估和局限性。此外,我们还研究了道德方面的考虑因素,如偏见和潜在的不当行为。我们的研究结果凸显了 ChatGPT 的卓越性能,并将其定位为领先模型。这份调查报告对于在会话人工智能领域工作的学者、创新者和相关人士来说是一份重要的资源,为前沿语言模型的发展提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ChatGPT versus Bard: A comparative study
The rapid progress in conversational AI has given rise to advanced language models capable of generating human‐like texts. Among these models, ChatGPT and Bard, developed by OpenAI and Google AI respectively, have gained significant attention. With their wide range of functionalities, such as human‐like response generation, proficiency in professional exams, complex problem solving, and more, these models have captured interest. This study presents a comprehensive survey exploring and comparing the capabilities and features of ChatGPT and Bard. We delve into their architectures, training methodologies, performance evaluations, and limitations across various domains. Ethical considerations such as biases and potential misconduct are also examined. Our findings highlight ChatGPT's exceptional performance, positioning it as a leading model. This survey is a vital resource for scholars, innovators, and interested parties operating within the domain of conversational artificial intelligence, offering valuable insights for the advancement of cutting‐edge language models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An AI based cross‐language aspect‐level sentiment analysis model using English corpus Development and characterization of in‐situ nickel aluminide reinforced Al‐Si matrix composites by stir casting Evaluating ground vibration attenuation through leca‐filled trenches: A support vector machine approach Performance of dual‐chamber oscillating water column device under irregular incident waves using Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes model Performance of multilayered porous breakwater under irregular waves having different wave spectrum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1