远视度数与虹膜角膜角之间的比较,横断面研究

M. P. González, Piero Barrera Arshavin, C. M. Sanguesa, G. E. Torres, J. H. Zech
{"title":"远视度数与虹膜角膜角之间的比较,横断面研究","authors":"M. P. González, Piero Barrera Arshavin, C. M. Sanguesa, G. E. Torres, J. H. Zech","doi":"10.15406/aovs.2024.14.00458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To determine whether there is a correlation between the degree of hyperopia and the presence of a narrow iridocorneal angle (ICA) in the general population. Methods: Cross-sectional study, period December 2022 - June 2023 at the Instituto de la Visión, Chile. Sample size of 177 patients (353 eyes). Hyperopes are classified as mild (less than 3 dioptres), moderate (3 to 6 dioptres), or high (greater than 6 dioptres). The AIC, assessed by gonioscopy (4-mirror gonioscope), according to Shaffer in 4 degrees, dichotomised from 0 to 2 as narrow angle, and 3 to 4 as open. An emmetropic \"control\" group was maintained, with a range of +/- 0.5 spherical dioptres. Statistical analysis: The chi-square test was used for the association between the two variables. Results: Of the total number of patients, 65% had mild hyperopia (n=229), 13% moderate (n=47), 0.6% high, while 21% corresponded to the \"control\" group (n=75). Of the total, 41% had narrow angle (n=146) and 59% open (n=207). In the analysis by group, mild hypermetropes showed 46% (n=105) of narrow angles compared to 27% (n=20) of the 'control' group. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). When comparing the moderate hyperopia group, which had 40.4% (n=19) of narrow angles, significant differences were observed compared to the 'control group', but not compared to the mild hyperopia group (p=0.2). Conclusion: There is a significant association between hyperopia and narrow AIC measured by gonioscopy, independent of the degree of severity of hyperopia. It is therefore advisable to screen for narrow angles in these patient groups.","PeriodicalId":287670,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Ophthalmology &amp; Visual System","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between degree of hyperopia and iridocorneal angle, cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"M. P. González, Piero Barrera Arshavin, C. M. Sanguesa, G. E. Torres, J. H. Zech\",\"doi\":\"10.15406/aovs.2024.14.00458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To determine whether there is a correlation between the degree of hyperopia and the presence of a narrow iridocorneal angle (ICA) in the general population. Methods: Cross-sectional study, period December 2022 - June 2023 at the Instituto de la Visión, Chile. Sample size of 177 patients (353 eyes). Hyperopes are classified as mild (less than 3 dioptres), moderate (3 to 6 dioptres), or high (greater than 6 dioptres). The AIC, assessed by gonioscopy (4-mirror gonioscope), according to Shaffer in 4 degrees, dichotomised from 0 to 2 as narrow angle, and 3 to 4 as open. An emmetropic \\\"control\\\" group was maintained, with a range of +/- 0.5 spherical dioptres. Statistical analysis: The chi-square test was used for the association between the two variables. Results: Of the total number of patients, 65% had mild hyperopia (n=229), 13% moderate (n=47), 0.6% high, while 21% corresponded to the \\\"control\\\" group (n=75). Of the total, 41% had narrow angle (n=146) and 59% open (n=207). In the analysis by group, mild hypermetropes showed 46% (n=105) of narrow angles compared to 27% (n=20) of the 'control' group. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). When comparing the moderate hyperopia group, which had 40.4% (n=19) of narrow angles, significant differences were observed compared to the 'control group', but not compared to the mild hyperopia group (p=0.2). Conclusion: There is a significant association between hyperopia and narrow AIC measured by gonioscopy, independent of the degree of severity of hyperopia. It is therefore advisable to screen for narrow angles in these patient groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Ophthalmology &amp; Visual System\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Ophthalmology &amp; Visual System\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15406/aovs.2024.14.00458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Ophthalmology &amp; Visual System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/aovs.2024.14.00458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的确定普通人群的远视程度与虹膜角膜狭小(ICA)之间是否存在相关性。方法:横断面研究:横断面研究,2022 年 12 月至 2023 年 6 月在智利视觉研究所进行。样本量为 177 名患者(353 只眼睛)。远视分为轻度(小于3度)、中度(3至6度)和高度(大于6度)。根据沙弗尔(Shaffer)的观点,通过球镜(四镜球镜)评估的AIC为4度,0至2度为窄角,3至4度为开角。视力正常 "对照 "组的球面屈光度范围为 +/- 0.5。统计分析:对两个变量之间的关联采用卡方检验。结果在所有患者中,65% 患有轻度远视(人数=229),13% 患有中度远视(人数=47),0.6% 患有高度远视,而 21% 的患者属于 "对照 "组(人数=75)。其中,41%为窄角(146 人),59%为开角(207 人)。按组别进行分析,轻度远视者有46%(n=105)为窄角,而 "对照 "组为27%(n=20)。这一差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。中度远视组的窄角比例为 40.4%(n=19),与 "对照组 "相比差异显著,但与轻度远视组相比差异不显著(p=0.2)。结论远视与球镜测量的窄角膜切迹之间有明显的关联,与远视的严重程度无关。因此,建议对这些患者群体进行狭角筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison between degree of hyperopia and iridocorneal angle, cross-sectional study
Objectives: To determine whether there is a correlation between the degree of hyperopia and the presence of a narrow iridocorneal angle (ICA) in the general population. Methods: Cross-sectional study, period December 2022 - June 2023 at the Instituto de la Visión, Chile. Sample size of 177 patients (353 eyes). Hyperopes are classified as mild (less than 3 dioptres), moderate (3 to 6 dioptres), or high (greater than 6 dioptres). The AIC, assessed by gonioscopy (4-mirror gonioscope), according to Shaffer in 4 degrees, dichotomised from 0 to 2 as narrow angle, and 3 to 4 as open. An emmetropic "control" group was maintained, with a range of +/- 0.5 spherical dioptres. Statistical analysis: The chi-square test was used for the association between the two variables. Results: Of the total number of patients, 65% had mild hyperopia (n=229), 13% moderate (n=47), 0.6% high, while 21% corresponded to the "control" group (n=75). Of the total, 41% had narrow angle (n=146) and 59% open (n=207). In the analysis by group, mild hypermetropes showed 46% (n=105) of narrow angles compared to 27% (n=20) of the 'control' group. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). When comparing the moderate hyperopia group, which had 40.4% (n=19) of narrow angles, significant differences were observed compared to the 'control group', but not compared to the mild hyperopia group (p=0.2). Conclusion: There is a significant association between hyperopia and narrow AIC measured by gonioscopy, independent of the degree of severity of hyperopia. It is therefore advisable to screen for narrow angles in these patient groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of gestational diabetes on the eye: a mini review Case report: Retinal alterations in a young patient without comorbidities using injectable testosterone for aesthetic purposes Autoimmune scleritis: A new look at etiopathogenesis and treatment Bilateral anterior capsular phimosis in an 85-year-old female patient after stand-alone cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation Comparison between degree of hyperopia and iridocorneal angle, cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1