"头颈部计算机断层扫描分析中的 "盲点

Valentin A. Nechaev, Aleksandr Yu. Vasiliev
{"title":"\"头颈部计算机断层扫描分析中的 \"盲点","authors":"Valentin A. Nechaev, Aleksandr Yu. Vasiliev","doi":"10.17816/clinpract624757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In radiology diagnostic errors occur in 2–5% of cases and most of them are due to perception errors, when a pathology don’t detected during the initial analysis, although its presence is very obvious during a retrospective analysis. In some cases, their appearance is associated with the presence of “blind spots” - anatomical areas that most often go unnoticed when interpreted by a radiologist. It is extremely important to know their features when analyzing the study of the head and neck area for a targeted and systematic search for pathology. \n \n \nAims: determine the most common anatomical areas in which radiologists do not describe pathological changes when analyzing computed tomograms of the head and neck area. \n \n \nMethods: retrospectively analyzed 64 CT scans of the head and neck region in cancer patients, in which there was no description of additional clinically significant pathological changes at the initial assessment. All cases of missed pathology were identified after repeat radiological examination or retrospective analysis of the study. \n \n \nResults: Several anatomical zones were identified in which the most common pathological findings were not described in the initial analysis of CT studies of the head and neck area: brachiocephalic vessels (n=15; 24,2%), parotid salivary glands (n=10; 16,1% ), paranasal sinuses (n=8; 12,9%), lungs and mediastinum (n=9; 14,6%), brain and temporal bones (n=5; 8,1%), soft tissues of the neck (n =4; 6,5%), thyroid gland and cervical spine (n=3; 4,8%). \n \n \nConclusions: the most common “blind spots” in the analysis of CT scans of the head and neck region have been identified. Knowledge of them can potentially lead to a reduction in the incidence of missed pathology when interpreting an CT study of this anatomical location.","PeriodicalId":508133,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"57 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Blind spots\\\" in the analysis of computed tomography of the head and neck area\",\"authors\":\"Valentin A. Nechaev, Aleksandr Yu. Vasiliev\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/clinpract624757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: In radiology diagnostic errors occur in 2–5% of cases and most of them are due to perception errors, when a pathology don’t detected during the initial analysis, although its presence is very obvious during a retrospective analysis. In some cases, their appearance is associated with the presence of “blind spots” - anatomical areas that most often go unnoticed when interpreted by a radiologist. It is extremely important to know their features when analyzing the study of the head and neck area for a targeted and systematic search for pathology. \\n \\n \\nAims: determine the most common anatomical areas in which radiologists do not describe pathological changes when analyzing computed tomograms of the head and neck area. \\n \\n \\nMethods: retrospectively analyzed 64 CT scans of the head and neck region in cancer patients, in which there was no description of additional clinically significant pathological changes at the initial assessment. All cases of missed pathology were identified after repeat radiological examination or retrospective analysis of the study. \\n \\n \\nResults: Several anatomical zones were identified in which the most common pathological findings were not described in the initial analysis of CT studies of the head and neck area: brachiocephalic vessels (n=15; 24,2%), parotid salivary glands (n=10; 16,1% ), paranasal sinuses (n=8; 12,9%), lungs and mediastinum (n=9; 14,6%), brain and temporal bones (n=5; 8,1%), soft tissues of the neck (n =4; 6,5%), thyroid gland and cervical spine (n=3; 4,8%). \\n \\n \\nConclusions: the most common “blind spots” in the analysis of CT scans of the head and neck region have been identified. Knowledge of them can potentially lead to a reduction in the incidence of missed pathology when interpreting an CT study of this anatomical location.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"57 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/clinpract624757\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/clinpract624757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在放射学诊断中,2%-5% 的病例会出现诊断错误,其中大部分是由于感知错误造成的,即在最初的分析中没有发现病变,但在回顾性分析中却非常明显地发现了病变的存在。在某些情况下,病变的出现与 "盲点 "的存在有关,即放射科医生在解读时经常忽略的解剖区域。在对头颈部进行分析研究时,了解这些盲点的特征对于有针对性地系统查找病变极为重要。 目的:确定放射科医生在分析头颈部计算机断层扫描图像时未描述病理变化的最常见解剖区域。 方法:回顾性分析 64 例癌症患者的头颈部 CT 扫描图像,这些扫描图像在初次评估时没有描述其他具有临床意义的病理变化。所有漏诊病例均在重复放射检查或回顾性分析研究后确定。 研究结果在头颈部 CT 研究的初步分析中,发现了几个未描述最常见病理结果的解剖区域:肱脑血管(n=15;24.2%)、腮腺唾液腺(n=10;16.1%)、副鼻窦(n=8;12.9%)、肺和纵隔(n=9;14.6%)、脑和颞骨(n=5;8.1%)、颈部软组织(n=4;6.5%)、甲状腺和颈椎(n=3;4.8%)。 结论:头颈部 CT 扫描分析中最常见的 "盲点 "已经确定。了解了这些盲点,就有可能在解读这一解剖部位的 CT 研究时减少病理漏诊的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"Blind spots" in the analysis of computed tomography of the head and neck area
Background: In radiology diagnostic errors occur in 2–5% of cases and most of them are due to perception errors, when a pathology don’t detected during the initial analysis, although its presence is very obvious during a retrospective analysis. In some cases, their appearance is associated with the presence of “blind spots” - anatomical areas that most often go unnoticed when interpreted by a radiologist. It is extremely important to know their features when analyzing the study of the head and neck area for a targeted and systematic search for pathology. Aims: determine the most common anatomical areas in which radiologists do not describe pathological changes when analyzing computed tomograms of the head and neck area. Methods: retrospectively analyzed 64 CT scans of the head and neck region in cancer patients, in which there was no description of additional clinically significant pathological changes at the initial assessment. All cases of missed pathology were identified after repeat radiological examination or retrospective analysis of the study. Results: Several anatomical zones were identified in which the most common pathological findings were not described in the initial analysis of CT studies of the head and neck area: brachiocephalic vessels (n=15; 24,2%), parotid salivary glands (n=10; 16,1% ), paranasal sinuses (n=8; 12,9%), lungs and mediastinum (n=9; 14,6%), brain and temporal bones (n=5; 8,1%), soft tissues of the neck (n =4; 6,5%), thyroid gland and cervical spine (n=3; 4,8%). Conclusions: the most common “blind spots” in the analysis of CT scans of the head and neck region have been identified. Knowledge of them can potentially lead to a reduction in the incidence of missed pathology when interpreting an CT study of this anatomical location.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SOLITARY CUTANEOUS NEOPLASMS: ANALYSING THE UNCERTAIN BEHAVIOUR WITH THE AID OF HISTOPATHOLOGY Computed tomographic signs of the “possible” aspergillosis in dynamic observation of patients with COVID-19 Influence of reactive and proactive motor decision strategies on hand kinematic characteristics in stroke patients Informativeness of echocardiography in inferior myocardial infarction at different stages of observation Sirtuins in clinical trials of approaches to the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1