Guilherme Samprogna Mohor, Tobias Sieg, Oliver Koch, Aaron Buhrmann, Holger Maiwald, Jochen Schwarz, Annegret H. Thieken
{"title":"基于遥感技术的阿赫尔河谷建筑结构损坏测绘","authors":"Guilherme Samprogna Mohor, Tobias Sieg, Oliver Koch, Aaron Buhrmann, Holger Maiwald, Jochen Schwarz, Annegret H. Thieken","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.12983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Flood damage data are needed for various applications. Structural damage of buildings can reflect not only the economic damage but also the life-threatening condition of a building, which provide crucial information for disaster response and recovery. Since traditional on-site data collection shortly after a disaster is challenging, remote sensing data can be of great help, cover a wider area and be deployed earlier in time than on-site surveys. However, this has its challenges and limitations. We elucidate on that by presenting two case studies from flash floods in Germany. First, we assessed the reliability of an existing flood damage schema, which differentiates from minor (structural) damage to complete building collapse. We compared two on-site raters of the 2016 Braunsbach flood, reaching an excellent level of reliability. Second, we mapped structural building damage after the flood in the Ahr valley in 2021 using a textured 3D mesh and orthophotos. Here, we evaluated the remote sense-based damage mapping done by three raters. Although the heterogeneity of ratings using remote sensing data is larger than among on-site ratings, we consider it fit-for-purpose when compared with on-site mapping, especially for event documentation and as basis for financial damage estimation and less complex numerical modelling.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.12983","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remote sensing-based mapping of structural building damage in the Ahr valley\",\"authors\":\"Guilherme Samprogna Mohor, Tobias Sieg, Oliver Koch, Aaron Buhrmann, Holger Maiwald, Jochen Schwarz, Annegret H. Thieken\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jfr3.12983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Flood damage data are needed for various applications. Structural damage of buildings can reflect not only the economic damage but also the life-threatening condition of a building, which provide crucial information for disaster response and recovery. Since traditional on-site data collection shortly after a disaster is challenging, remote sensing data can be of great help, cover a wider area and be deployed earlier in time than on-site surveys. However, this has its challenges and limitations. We elucidate on that by presenting two case studies from flash floods in Germany. First, we assessed the reliability of an existing flood damage schema, which differentiates from minor (structural) damage to complete building collapse. We compared two on-site raters of the 2016 Braunsbach flood, reaching an excellent level of reliability. Second, we mapped structural building damage after the flood in the Ahr valley in 2021 using a textured 3D mesh and orthophotos. Here, we evaluated the remote sense-based damage mapping done by three raters. Although the heterogeneity of ratings using remote sensing data is larger than among on-site ratings, we consider it fit-for-purpose when compared with on-site mapping, especially for event documentation and as basis for financial damage estimation and less complex numerical modelling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Flood Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.12983\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Flood Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.12983\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.12983","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Remote sensing-based mapping of structural building damage in the Ahr valley
Flood damage data are needed for various applications. Structural damage of buildings can reflect not only the economic damage but also the life-threatening condition of a building, which provide crucial information for disaster response and recovery. Since traditional on-site data collection shortly after a disaster is challenging, remote sensing data can be of great help, cover a wider area and be deployed earlier in time than on-site surveys. However, this has its challenges and limitations. We elucidate on that by presenting two case studies from flash floods in Germany. First, we assessed the reliability of an existing flood damage schema, which differentiates from minor (structural) damage to complete building collapse. We compared two on-site raters of the 2016 Braunsbach flood, reaching an excellent level of reliability. Second, we mapped structural building damage after the flood in the Ahr valley in 2021 using a textured 3D mesh and orthophotos. Here, we evaluated the remote sense-based damage mapping done by three raters. Although the heterogeneity of ratings using remote sensing data is larger than among on-site ratings, we consider it fit-for-purpose when compared with on-site mapping, especially for event documentation and as basis for financial damage estimation and less complex numerical modelling.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind.
Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.