Gabriela Bertazzi Pignotti, Ana Mafalda Matos, Fernanda Giannotti da Silva Ferreira
{"title":"掺入工业废料的非结构性振动压缩混凝土","authors":"Gabriela Bertazzi Pignotti, Ana Mafalda Matos, Fernanda Giannotti da Silva Ferreira","doi":"10.3390/recycling9020026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents more eco-efficient concrete formulations for precast vibro-compressed masonry blocks. The proposed formulations incorporated industrial waste, glass powder (GP), and quartz powder (QP), in which natural aggregate was partially replaced by QP (10%) and Portland cement by GP (10% and 20%). The best combination of powder materials, water, and admixture was optimised at mortar level, considering a “zero slump” criteria and compressive strength. Afterwards, studies at concrete level followed. Specimens were vibrated and compressed in laboratory and immediately demoulded, aiming to simulate the industrial process. The compressive strength decreased when GP and QP were used alone; however, when combining 10% GP as cement replacement + 10% QP as fine aggregate replacement, the compressive strength increased by approximately 26.6% compared to the reference concrete. Water absorption results varied between 8.92 and 17.9%, and the lowest absorption was obtained by concrete specimens incorporating 20% GP. The UPV presented a narrow range of variation among all concrete mixtures under study, around 2–2.5 km/s at 28 days, whereas electrical resistivity was achieved at 28 days, at 20,000 and 25,000 ohms. Although there were some limitations of the casting process at the laboratory scale, the research results showed promising results, and it seems feasible to use this waste as a substitute for non-renewable raw materials in the production of concrete on an industrial scale. This can provide added value to abundant local wastes while contributing to a circular concrete economy.","PeriodicalId":36729,"journal":{"name":"Recycling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-Structural Vibro-Compressed Concrete Incorporating Industrial Wastes\",\"authors\":\"Gabriela Bertazzi Pignotti, Ana Mafalda Matos, Fernanda Giannotti da Silva Ferreira\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/recycling9020026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study presents more eco-efficient concrete formulations for precast vibro-compressed masonry blocks. The proposed formulations incorporated industrial waste, glass powder (GP), and quartz powder (QP), in which natural aggregate was partially replaced by QP (10%) and Portland cement by GP (10% and 20%). The best combination of powder materials, water, and admixture was optimised at mortar level, considering a “zero slump” criteria and compressive strength. Afterwards, studies at concrete level followed. Specimens were vibrated and compressed in laboratory and immediately demoulded, aiming to simulate the industrial process. The compressive strength decreased when GP and QP were used alone; however, when combining 10% GP as cement replacement + 10% QP as fine aggregate replacement, the compressive strength increased by approximately 26.6% compared to the reference concrete. Water absorption results varied between 8.92 and 17.9%, and the lowest absorption was obtained by concrete specimens incorporating 20% GP. The UPV presented a narrow range of variation among all concrete mixtures under study, around 2–2.5 km/s at 28 days, whereas electrical resistivity was achieved at 28 days, at 20,000 and 25,000 ohms. Although there were some limitations of the casting process at the laboratory scale, the research results showed promising results, and it seems feasible to use this waste as a substitute for non-renewable raw materials in the production of concrete on an industrial scale. This can provide added value to abundant local wastes while contributing to a circular concrete economy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recycling\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling9020026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling9020026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究为预制振捣加压砌块提出了更生态高效的混凝土配方。所提议的配方包括工业废料、玻璃粉(GP)和石英粉(QP),其中天然骨料部分由 QP 替代(10%),波特兰水泥由 GP 替代(10% 和 20%)。考虑到 "零坍落度 "标准和抗压强度,在砂浆层面对粉末材料、水和外加剂的最佳组合进行了优化。随后进行了混凝土层面的研究。在实验室中对试样进行振动和压缩,然后立即脱模,目的是模拟工业生产过程。单独使用 GP 和 QP 时,抗压强度会降低;但是,当结合使用 10% GP 作为水泥替代物 + 10% QP 作为细骨料替代物时,抗压强度比参考混凝土提高了约 26.6%。吸水率介于 8.92% 和 17.9% 之间,吸水率最低的是含有 20% GP 的混凝土试样。在所研究的所有混凝土混合物中,UPV 的变化范围较窄,28 天时约为 2-2.5 千米/秒,而电阻率在 28 天时达到了 20,000 和 25,000 欧姆。尽管实验室规模的浇注过程存在一些局限性,但研究结果表明其前景看好,在工业规模的混凝土生产中使用这种废料替代不可再生原材料似乎是可行的。这可以为当地丰富的废物提供附加值,同时促进混凝土循环经济的发展。
This study presents more eco-efficient concrete formulations for precast vibro-compressed masonry blocks. The proposed formulations incorporated industrial waste, glass powder (GP), and quartz powder (QP), in which natural aggregate was partially replaced by QP (10%) and Portland cement by GP (10% and 20%). The best combination of powder materials, water, and admixture was optimised at mortar level, considering a “zero slump” criteria and compressive strength. Afterwards, studies at concrete level followed. Specimens were vibrated and compressed in laboratory and immediately demoulded, aiming to simulate the industrial process. The compressive strength decreased when GP and QP were used alone; however, when combining 10% GP as cement replacement + 10% QP as fine aggregate replacement, the compressive strength increased by approximately 26.6% compared to the reference concrete. Water absorption results varied between 8.92 and 17.9%, and the lowest absorption was obtained by concrete specimens incorporating 20% GP. The UPV presented a narrow range of variation among all concrete mixtures under study, around 2–2.5 km/s at 28 days, whereas electrical resistivity was achieved at 28 days, at 20,000 and 25,000 ohms. Although there were some limitations of the casting process at the laboratory scale, the research results showed promising results, and it seems feasible to use this waste as a substitute for non-renewable raw materials in the production of concrete on an industrial scale. This can provide added value to abundant local wastes while contributing to a circular concrete economy.