大豆作物中的空气辅助和静电喷洒

Mariana Rodrigues Bueno, Guilherme Sousa Alves, Sérgio Macedo Silva, Tiago Seiji S. Hachiya, Hasle Thiago S. Guimarães, Gustavo Araújo Costa, Felipe Soares Gonçalves, Mateus A. V. G. Oliveira
{"title":"大豆作物中的空气辅助和静电喷洒","authors":"Mariana Rodrigues Bueno, Guilherme Sousa Alves, Sérgio Macedo Silva, Tiago Seiji S. Hachiya, Hasle Thiago S. Guimarães, Gustavo Araújo Costa, Felipe Soares Gonçalves, Mateus A. V. G. Oliveira","doi":"10.3390/agrochemicals3020009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of air assistance associated with electrostatic spraying in terms of spray deposition and yield (Experiment 1), and the coverage and droplet density on soybean crops at different working speeds (Experiment 2). The treatments in Experiment 1 corresponded to combinations of electrostatic systems associated with air assistance at three airspeeds (21, 25, and 30 m·s−1) plus a conventional treatment without electrostatic or air assistance. The treatments in Experiment 2 corresponded to three working speeds (3.3, 4.2, and 5.0 m·s−1) with or without the use of an electrostatic system. All applications were performed with a self-propelled sprayer, delivering 75 L·ha−1 with ATR 2.0 nozzles. A blue tracer, detectable as absorbance with a spectrophotometer, was added to the spray solution to evaluate deposition. The results indicate that an air assistance at 21 m·s−1 plus electrostatic system increased the amount of spray deposited on the middle and top leaves of the plants in relation to the conventional system, with yield increments of up to 621 kg·ha−1. The slowest working speed (3.3 m·s−1) combined with air assistance and an electrostatic system provided the greatest spray deposition, droplet coverage, and density on the bottom leaves of soybean crops.","PeriodicalId":502241,"journal":{"name":"Agrochemicals","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Air Assistance and Electrostatic Spraying in Soybean Crops\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Rodrigues Bueno, Guilherme Sousa Alves, Sérgio Macedo Silva, Tiago Seiji S. Hachiya, Hasle Thiago S. Guimarães, Gustavo Araújo Costa, Felipe Soares Gonçalves, Mateus A. V. G. Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/agrochemicals3020009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of air assistance associated with electrostatic spraying in terms of spray deposition and yield (Experiment 1), and the coverage and droplet density on soybean crops at different working speeds (Experiment 2). The treatments in Experiment 1 corresponded to combinations of electrostatic systems associated with air assistance at three airspeeds (21, 25, and 30 m·s−1) plus a conventional treatment without electrostatic or air assistance. The treatments in Experiment 2 corresponded to three working speeds (3.3, 4.2, and 5.0 m·s−1) with or without the use of an electrostatic system. All applications were performed with a self-propelled sprayer, delivering 75 L·ha−1 with ATR 2.0 nozzles. A blue tracer, detectable as absorbance with a spectrophotometer, was added to the spray solution to evaluate deposition. The results indicate that an air assistance at 21 m·s−1 plus electrostatic system increased the amount of spray deposited on the middle and top leaves of the plants in relation to the conventional system, with yield increments of up to 621 kg·ha−1. The slowest working speed (3.3 m·s−1) combined with air assistance and an electrostatic system provided the greatest spray deposition, droplet coverage, and density on the bottom leaves of soybean crops.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agrochemicals\",\"volume\":\" 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agrochemicals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/agrochemicals3020009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrochemicals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/agrochemicals3020009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在从喷雾沉积和产量(实验 1)以及不同工作速度下对大豆作物的覆盖率和雾滴密度(实验 2)两个方面评估空气辅助静电喷雾的效率。实验 1 中的处理相当于静电系统与空气辅助系统在三种气速(21、25 和 30 m-s-1)下的组合,以及不含静电或空气辅助系统的常规处理。实验 2 中的处理对应于使用或不使用静电系统的三种工作速度(3.3、4.2 和 5.0 m-s-1)。所有施药均使用自走式喷雾器,用 ATR 2.0 喷嘴喷洒 75 L-ha-1。在喷洒溶液中加入了一种蓝色示踪剂,用分光光度计检测吸光度,以评估沉积情况。结果表明,与传统系统相比,21 米-秒-1 的空气辅助加静电系统增加了沉积在植物中间和顶部叶片上的喷雾量,增产幅度高达 621 千克-公顷-1。最慢的工作速度(3.3 m-s-1)加上空气辅助和静电系统,在大豆作物底部叶片上的喷雾沉积量、液滴覆盖率和密度最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Air Assistance and Electrostatic Spraying in Soybean Crops
This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of air assistance associated with electrostatic spraying in terms of spray deposition and yield (Experiment 1), and the coverage and droplet density on soybean crops at different working speeds (Experiment 2). The treatments in Experiment 1 corresponded to combinations of electrostatic systems associated with air assistance at three airspeeds (21, 25, and 30 m·s−1) plus a conventional treatment without electrostatic or air assistance. The treatments in Experiment 2 corresponded to three working speeds (3.3, 4.2, and 5.0 m·s−1) with or without the use of an electrostatic system. All applications were performed with a self-propelled sprayer, delivering 75 L·ha−1 with ATR 2.0 nozzles. A blue tracer, detectable as absorbance with a spectrophotometer, was added to the spray solution to evaluate deposition. The results indicate that an air assistance at 21 m·s−1 plus electrostatic system increased the amount of spray deposited on the middle and top leaves of the plants in relation to the conventional system, with yield increments of up to 621 kg·ha−1. The slowest working speed (3.3 m·s−1) combined with air assistance and an electrostatic system provided the greatest spray deposition, droplet coverage, and density on the bottom leaves of soybean crops.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reduction in Nitrogen Fertilization Rate for Spring Wheat Due to Carbon Mineralization-Induced Nitrogen Mineralization Toxicity Assessment of 36 Herbicides to Green Algae: Effects of Mode of Action and Chemical Family Integrating Biological Control Agents for Enhanced Management of Apple Scab (Venturia inaequalis): Insights, Risks, Challenges, and Prospects Air Assistance and Electrostatic Spraying in Soybean Crops Imidacloprid Uptake and Leaching in the Critical Root Zone of a Florida Entisol
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1