哲学、艺术和文学中的迷宫形象

Diego Scalco
{"title":"哲学、艺术和文学中的迷宫形象","authors":"Diego Scalco","doi":"10.4467/23538953ce.24.001.19415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Figure of the Labyrinth between Philosophy, Art and Literature\n\nThe aim of this article is to draw analogies between the Prisons by Piranesi and The Castle by Franz Kafka in the light of the figure of the labyrinth. In these specific cases, the architectonics (as a pseudo- arrangement of perspective planes) and the plot (as a factitious connection between action sequences) enclose the illusion of depth and the impression of duration in the vicious circles of the lines of rupture and of the missed events, respectively. The Piranesian atopic topic (from atopos, « out of place ») and the Kafkaesque apraxic practice (from apraktos, « inconclusive ») are both based on unsurpassable antinomies and, in this particular respect, seem to revive Zeno of Elea’s paradoxes of motion and Diodorus Cronus’ aporia of becoming, which Gottfried W. Leibniz considers to be two labyrinths.","PeriodicalId":133418,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers ERTA","volume":" 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La figure du labyrinthe entre philosophie, art et littérature\",\"authors\":\"Diego Scalco\",\"doi\":\"10.4467/23538953ce.24.001.19415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Figure of the Labyrinth between Philosophy, Art and Literature\\n\\nThe aim of this article is to draw analogies between the Prisons by Piranesi and The Castle by Franz Kafka in the light of the figure of the labyrinth. In these specific cases, the architectonics (as a pseudo- arrangement of perspective planes) and the plot (as a factitious connection between action sequences) enclose the illusion of depth and the impression of duration in the vicious circles of the lines of rupture and of the missed events, respectively. The Piranesian atopic topic (from atopos, « out of place ») and the Kafkaesque apraxic practice (from apraktos, « inconclusive ») are both based on unsurpassable antinomies and, in this particular respect, seem to revive Zeno of Elea’s paradoxes of motion and Diodorus Cronus’ aporia of becoming, which Gottfried W. Leibniz considers to be two labyrinths.\",\"PeriodicalId\":133418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cahiers ERTA\",\"volume\":\" 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cahiers ERTA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4467/23538953ce.24.001.19415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cahiers ERTA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/23538953ce.24.001.19415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在从迷宫的角度,对皮拉内西(Piranesi)的《监狱》和卡夫卡(Franz Kafka)的《城堡》进行类比。在这些具体案例中,建筑学(作为透视平面的伪排列)和情节(作为动作序列之间的虚构联系)分别在断裂线的恶性循环和遗漏事件的恶性循环中包围了深度的错觉和持续时间的印象。皮拉内斯式的atopic主题(源自atopos,"格格不入")和卡夫卡式的apraxic实践(源自apraktos,"无定论")都以无法超越的对立为基础,在这方面,似乎重现了芝诺-埃利亚的运动悖论和迪奥多鲁斯-克洛诺斯的成为poria,戈特弗里德-莱布尼茨认为这是两个迷宫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
La figure du labyrinthe entre philosophie, art et littérature
The Figure of the Labyrinth between Philosophy, Art and Literature The aim of this article is to draw analogies between the Prisons by Piranesi and The Castle by Franz Kafka in the light of the figure of the labyrinth. In these specific cases, the architectonics (as a pseudo- arrangement of perspective planes) and the plot (as a factitious connection between action sequences) enclose the illusion of depth and the impression of duration in the vicious circles of the lines of rupture and of the missed events, respectively. The Piranesian atopic topic (from atopos, « out of place ») and the Kafkaesque apraxic practice (from apraktos, « inconclusive ») are both based on unsurpassable antinomies and, in this particular respect, seem to revive Zeno of Elea’s paradoxes of motion and Diodorus Cronus’ aporia of becoming, which Gottfried W. Leibniz considers to be two labyrinths.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
La figure du labyrinthe entre philosophie, art et littérature Littérature labyrinthique entre texte et sexe dans Journal sexuel d’un garçon d’aujourd’hui d’Arthur Dreyfus Annelies Schulte Nordholt, Georges Perec et ses lieux de mémoire. Le projet de Lieux, Leyde, Brill, coll. « Faux Titre », 2022, 268 p. Ut pictura poesis. From One plus One to the « Godardesques » in contemporary aesthetics L’enquête dans le récit contemporain, une représentation esthétique du labyrinthe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1