分散结构中的风险管理:共享服务中心分析

Ekonomia Pub Date : 2024-03-15 DOI:10.19195/2658-1310.29.2.4
Zuzanna Zaporowska, Marek Szczepański
{"title":"分散结构中的风险管理:共享服务中心分析","authors":"Zuzanna Zaporowska, Marek Szczepański","doi":"10.19195/2658-1310.29.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nResearch background: Shared Services Centers (SSCs) are often a spin-off of corporate services to separate all operational tasks from the corporate headquarters. The primary focus of the headquarters should be on leadership and corporate governance. However, many SSCs have also been given some corporate functions. Risk management is a significant part of governance and one of its principles. The effectiveness of risk management depends on its integration into the organization’s governance, including decision-making. The question is how a modern SSC manages this part of governance. \nPurpose: This study aims to present the conditions that prove the implementation of risk management in SSCs and to evaluate the most effective risk management model. \nResearch methodology: Targeted literature review followed by surveys and a case study. \nResults: The risk management process consists of several stages that are repeated in many models (identification and risk assessment, risk management model selection, and monitoring). Thus, it is possible to use each model in the SSC concerning the migrated processes, considering the limitations of the strategic goals definition. However, not all methods will find a potential application in risk management in the SSC, considering the most effective risk assessment. \nNovelty: While the literature provides models that can be of use, a lack of specific guidelines has been recognized, especially regarding the risk management aspect in SSCs. In the last decade, the focus was on the expected benefits coming from standardization, ignoring the new risks in SSC processes. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":517600,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomia","volume":" 32","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk management in diffused structures: Analysis for Shared Services Centers\",\"authors\":\"Zuzanna Zaporowska, Marek Szczepański\",\"doi\":\"10.19195/2658-1310.29.2.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\nResearch background: Shared Services Centers (SSCs) are often a spin-off of corporate services to separate all operational tasks from the corporate headquarters. The primary focus of the headquarters should be on leadership and corporate governance. However, many SSCs have also been given some corporate functions. Risk management is a significant part of governance and one of its principles. The effectiveness of risk management depends on its integration into the organization’s governance, including decision-making. The question is how a modern SSC manages this part of governance. \\nPurpose: This study aims to present the conditions that prove the implementation of risk management in SSCs and to evaluate the most effective risk management model. \\nResearch methodology: Targeted literature review followed by surveys and a case study. \\nResults: The risk management process consists of several stages that are repeated in many models (identification and risk assessment, risk management model selection, and monitoring). Thus, it is possible to use each model in the SSC concerning the migrated processes, considering the limitations of the strategic goals definition. However, not all methods will find a potential application in risk management in the SSC, considering the most effective risk assessment. \\nNovelty: While the literature provides models that can be of use, a lack of specific guidelines has been recognized, especially regarding the risk management aspect in SSCs. In the last decade, the focus was on the expected benefits coming from standardization, ignoring the new risks in SSC processes. \\n \\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":517600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ekonomia\",\"volume\":\" 32\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ekonomia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19195/2658-1310.29.2.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19195/2658-1310.29.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景:共享服务中心(SSC)通常是企业服务的分拆,目的是将所有运营任务从企业总部分离出来。总部的主要重点应放在领导力和公司治理上。不过,许多共享服务中心也被赋予了一些企业职能。风险管理是治理的重要组成部分,也是治理原则之一。风险管理的有效性取决于将其纳入组织的治理,包括决策。问题是现代南南合作如何管理这部分治理工作。目的:本研究旨在提出证明南南合作实施风险管理的条件,并评估最有效的风险管理模式。研究方法:有针对性地查阅文献,然后进行调查和案例研究。研究结果:风险管理过程由多个阶段组成,这些阶段在许多模式中重复出现(识别和风险评估、风险管理模式选择和监测)。因此,考虑到战略目标定义的局限性,有可能在南南合作中使用有关迁移流程的每种模式。不过,考虑到最有效的风险评估,并非所有方法都能在南南合作的风险管理中找到潜在的应用。新颖性:虽然文献提供了一些可用的模型,但人们认识到缺乏具体的指导方针,特别是在南南合作的风险管理方面。在过去的十年中,关注的焦点是标准化带来的预期效益,而忽视了南南合作进程中的新风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk management in diffused structures: Analysis for Shared Services Centers
Research background: Shared Services Centers (SSCs) are often a spin-off of corporate services to separate all operational tasks from the corporate headquarters. The primary focus of the headquarters should be on leadership and corporate governance. However, many SSCs have also been given some corporate functions. Risk management is a significant part of governance and one of its principles. The effectiveness of risk management depends on its integration into the organization’s governance, including decision-making. The question is how a modern SSC manages this part of governance. Purpose: This study aims to present the conditions that prove the implementation of risk management in SSCs and to evaluate the most effective risk management model. Research methodology: Targeted literature review followed by surveys and a case study. Results: The risk management process consists of several stages that are repeated in many models (identification and risk assessment, risk management model selection, and monitoring). Thus, it is possible to use each model in the SSC concerning the migrated processes, considering the limitations of the strategic goals definition. However, not all methods will find a potential application in risk management in the SSC, considering the most effective risk assessment. Novelty: While the literature provides models that can be of use, a lack of specific guidelines has been recognized, especially regarding the risk management aspect in SSCs. In the last decade, the focus was on the expected benefits coming from standardization, ignoring the new risks in SSC processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Essential elements of a city offer addressed to digital nomads: The perspective of territorial marketing Modern technologies and the management of sports and leisure buyer engagement Functioning of healthcare entities as learning organisations in Poland on the example of Podlaskie voivodeship Consumers of different generations towards innovative technologies in customer service in retail Which companies among the SMEs operate in accordance with the Sustainable Development Goals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1