社交媒体上的内容审核公正与公平:不同语境和平台的比较

ArXiv Pub Date : 2024-03-09 DOI:10.1145/3613905.3650882
Jie Cai, Aashka Patel, Azadeh Naderi, D. Y. Wohn
{"title":"社交媒体上的内容审核公正与公平:不同语境和平台的比较","authors":"Jie Cai, Aashka Patel, Azadeh Naderi, D. Y. Wohn","doi":"10.1145/3613905.3650882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media users may perceive moderation decisions by the platform differently, which can lead to frustration and dropout. This study investigates users' perceived justice and fairness of online moderation decisions when they are exposed to various illegal versus legal scenarios, retributive versus restorative moderation strategies, and user-moderated versus commercially moderated platforms. We conduct an online experiment on 200 American social media users of Reddit and Twitter. Results show that retributive moderation delivers higher justice and fairness for commercially moderated than for user-moderated platforms in illegal violations; restorative moderation delivers higher fairness for legal violations than illegal ones. We discuss the opportunities for platform policymaking to improve moderation system design.","PeriodicalId":513202,"journal":{"name":"ArXiv","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Content Moderation Justice and Fairness on Social Media: Comparisons Across Different Contexts and Platforms\",\"authors\":\"Jie Cai, Aashka Patel, Azadeh Naderi, D. Y. Wohn\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3613905.3650882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social media users may perceive moderation decisions by the platform differently, which can lead to frustration and dropout. This study investigates users' perceived justice and fairness of online moderation decisions when they are exposed to various illegal versus legal scenarios, retributive versus restorative moderation strategies, and user-moderated versus commercially moderated platforms. We conduct an online experiment on 200 American social media users of Reddit and Twitter. Results show that retributive moderation delivers higher justice and fairness for commercially moderated than for user-moderated platforms in illegal violations; restorative moderation delivers higher fairness for legal violations than illegal ones. We discuss the opportunities for platform policymaking to improve moderation system design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":513202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ArXiv\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ArXiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3613905.3650882\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ArXiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3613905.3650882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社交媒体用户可能会对平台的审核决定有不同的感知,这可能会导致挫败感和辍学。本研究调查了用户在遇到各种非法与合法的情况、惩罚性与恢复性的审核策略、用户审核平台与商业审核平台时,对在线审核决定的公正性和公平性的感知。我们对 Reddit 和 Twitter 的 200 名美国社交媒体用户进行了在线实验。结果表明,在非法违规的情况下,商业管理平台的惩罚性审核比用户管理平台的公正性和公平性更高;在合法违规的情况下,恢复性审核比非法违规的公正性更高。我们讨论了平台政策制定改进审核系统设计的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Content Moderation Justice and Fairness on Social Media: Comparisons Across Different Contexts and Platforms
Social media users may perceive moderation decisions by the platform differently, which can lead to frustration and dropout. This study investigates users' perceived justice and fairness of online moderation decisions when they are exposed to various illegal versus legal scenarios, retributive versus restorative moderation strategies, and user-moderated versus commercially moderated platforms. We conduct an online experiment on 200 American social media users of Reddit and Twitter. Results show that retributive moderation delivers higher justice and fairness for commercially moderated than for user-moderated platforms in illegal violations; restorative moderation delivers higher fairness for legal violations than illegal ones. We discuss the opportunities for platform policymaking to improve moderation system design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combining Transformer based Deep Reinforcement Learning with Black-Litterman Model for Portfolio Optimization TinyGC-Net: An Extremely Tiny Network for Calibrating MEMS Gyroscopes Short-Term Solar Irradiance Forecasting Under Data Transmission Constraints F2Depth: Self-supervised Indoor Monocular Depth Estimation via Optical Flow Consistency and Feature Map Synthesis Efficient Constrained k-Center Clustering with Background Knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1