Ghareb M. Hamada, Abbas M. Al-khudafi, Hamzah A. Al-Sharifi, Ibrahim A. Farea, Salem O. Baarimah, Abdelrigeeb A. Al-Gathe, Mohamed A. Bamaga
{"title":"利用机器学习技术确定碳酸盐岩储层岩石的岩相特征","authors":"Ghareb M. Hamada, Abbas M. Al-khudafi, Hamzah A. Al-Sharifi, Ibrahim A. Farea, Salem O. Baarimah, Abdelrigeeb A. Al-Gathe, Mohamed A. Bamaga","doi":"10.21608/jpme.2024.265484.1190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to assess the effectiveness of several decision tree machine techniques for identifying formation lithology of complex carbonate reservoir rocks in Gamal oil field. A total of 20966 log data points from four wells were used to create the study's data. Lithology is determined using seven log parameters. The seven log parameters are the density log, neutron log, sonic log, gamma ray log, deep lateral log, shallow lateral log, and resistivity log. Different decision tree-based algorithms for classification approaches were applied. Several typical machine learning models, namely the, Random Forest. Random trees, J48, reduced-error pruning decision trees, logistic model trees, Hoeffding Tree were assessed using well logging data for formation lithology prediction. The obtained results show that the random forest model, out of the proposed decision tree models, performed best at lithology identification, with precession, recall, and F-score values of 0.913, 0.914, and 0.913, respectively. Random trees came next. with average precision, recall, and F1-score of 0.837, 0.84, and 0.837, respectively, the J48 model came in third place. The Hoeffding Tree classification model, however, showed the worst performance. We conclude that boosting strategies enhance the performance of tree-based models. Evaluation of prediction capability of models is also carried out using different datasets","PeriodicalId":34437,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Petroleum and Mining Engineering","volume":"273 29‐32","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of Lithfacies Properties of Carbonate Reservoir rocks using Machine Learning Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Ghareb M. Hamada, Abbas M. Al-khudafi, Hamzah A. Al-Sharifi, Ibrahim A. Farea, Salem O. Baarimah, Abdelrigeeb A. Al-Gathe, Mohamed A. Bamaga\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/jpme.2024.265484.1190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to assess the effectiveness of several decision tree machine techniques for identifying formation lithology of complex carbonate reservoir rocks in Gamal oil field. A total of 20966 log data points from four wells were used to create the study's data. Lithology is determined using seven log parameters. The seven log parameters are the density log, neutron log, sonic log, gamma ray log, deep lateral log, shallow lateral log, and resistivity log. Different decision tree-based algorithms for classification approaches were applied. Several typical machine learning models, namely the, Random Forest. Random trees, J48, reduced-error pruning decision trees, logistic model trees, Hoeffding Tree were assessed using well logging data for formation lithology prediction. The obtained results show that the random forest model, out of the proposed decision tree models, performed best at lithology identification, with precession, recall, and F-score values of 0.913, 0.914, and 0.913, respectively. Random trees came next. with average precision, recall, and F1-score of 0.837, 0.84, and 0.837, respectively, the J48 model came in third place. The Hoeffding Tree classification model, however, showed the worst performance. We conclude that boosting strategies enhance the performance of tree-based models. Evaluation of prediction capability of models is also carried out using different datasets\",\"PeriodicalId\":34437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Petroleum and Mining Engineering\",\"volume\":\"273 29‐32\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Petroleum and Mining Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/jpme.2024.265484.1190\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Petroleum and Mining Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/jpme.2024.265484.1190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在评估几种决策树机器技术在识别加马尔油田复杂碳酸盐岩储层岩性方面的有效性。研究数据共使用了四口井的 20966 个测井数据点。岩性是通过七个测井参数确定的。这七个测井参数是密度测井、中子测井、声波测井、伽马射线测井、深侧向测井、浅侧向测井和电阻率测井。分类方法采用了不同的决策树算法。几种典型的机器学习模型,即随机森林(Random Forest)、随机树(Random Tree)、J48、还原树(reduced Tree)。使用测井数据评估了随机树、J48、减少误差修剪决策树、逻辑模型树、Hoeffding 树等用于地层岩性预测的机器学习模型。结果表明,在所提出的决策树模型中,随机森林模型在岩性识别方面表现最佳,其前程、召回和 F 分数值分别为 0.913、0.914 和 0.913。随机树次之,平均精度、召回率和 F1 分数分别为 0.837、0.84 和 0.837,J48 模型排名第三。然而,Hoeffding 树分类模型的表现最差。我们的结论是,提升策略提高了基于树的模型的性能。我们还使用不同的数据集对各模型的预测能力进行了评估
Characterization of Lithfacies Properties of Carbonate Reservoir rocks using Machine Learning Techniques
This study aims to assess the effectiveness of several decision tree machine techniques for identifying formation lithology of complex carbonate reservoir rocks in Gamal oil field. A total of 20966 log data points from four wells were used to create the study's data. Lithology is determined using seven log parameters. The seven log parameters are the density log, neutron log, sonic log, gamma ray log, deep lateral log, shallow lateral log, and resistivity log. Different decision tree-based algorithms for classification approaches were applied. Several typical machine learning models, namely the, Random Forest. Random trees, J48, reduced-error pruning decision trees, logistic model trees, Hoeffding Tree were assessed using well logging data for formation lithology prediction. The obtained results show that the random forest model, out of the proposed decision tree models, performed best at lithology identification, with precession, recall, and F-score values of 0.913, 0.914, and 0.913, respectively. Random trees came next. with average precision, recall, and F1-score of 0.837, 0.84, and 0.837, respectively, the J48 model came in third place. The Hoeffding Tree classification model, however, showed the worst performance. We conclude that boosting strategies enhance the performance of tree-based models. Evaluation of prediction capability of models is also carried out using different datasets