传导系统的盈利能力和效率以及新鲜番茄的最佳密度

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Comunicata Scientiae Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI:10.14295/cs.v15.4009
F. L. Dipple, Franciely da Silva Ponce, C. Toledo, Rejeane Maria Da Silva, Cleci Grzebieluckas, Santino Seabra Júnior
{"title":"传导系统的盈利能力和效率以及新鲜番茄的最佳密度","authors":"F. L. Dipple, Franciely da Silva Ponce, C. Toledo, Rejeane Maria Da Silva, Cleci Grzebieluckas, Santino Seabra Júnior","doi":"10.14295/cs.v15.4009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluated the productivity and economic profitability of cultivation systems for the table market. A hybrid tomato cultivar, Fascínio was grown in 12 cultivation systems of the “half stake”, “open V”, and “low” types, with four spacings–0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 m between plants and 1.5 m between rows. Eleven fruits were harvested at the mature stage, and the productive (total, commercial, and non-commercial productivity, percentage of losses, and types of damage) and economic (production cost, revenue, and profit) parameters were evaluated. The half-stake and low (both with 0.2 m spacing) cropping systems showed the highest total yields (179 t ha-1), differing from the open V (154.4 t ha-1) and half-stake (0.2 m spacing) systems at higher commercial productivity (158.1 t ha-1). With a production cost below 100 thousand R$ per hectare and a profitability index above 58%, the half-stake and low (0.2 m spacing) cultivation systems proved to be more productive and economically efficient than the open V system, fulfilling the requirements of tomato growers. The creeping system (0.2 m spacing) had the highest percentage of losses (22%) due to non-marketable fruits; Based on damage nature, the half-stake system tomatoes showed black backgrounds and the open and creeping systems showed tomato locules affected by pests.","PeriodicalId":38570,"journal":{"name":"Comunicata Scientiae","volume":"5 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profitability and efficiency of conduction systems and optimal tomato density for fresh consumption\",\"authors\":\"F. L. Dipple, Franciely da Silva Ponce, C. Toledo, Rejeane Maria Da Silva, Cleci Grzebieluckas, Santino Seabra Júnior\",\"doi\":\"10.14295/cs.v15.4009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study evaluated the productivity and economic profitability of cultivation systems for the table market. A hybrid tomato cultivar, Fascínio was grown in 12 cultivation systems of the “half stake”, “open V”, and “low” types, with four spacings–0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 m between plants and 1.5 m between rows. Eleven fruits were harvested at the mature stage, and the productive (total, commercial, and non-commercial productivity, percentage of losses, and types of damage) and economic (production cost, revenue, and profit) parameters were evaluated. The half-stake and low (both with 0.2 m spacing) cropping systems showed the highest total yields (179 t ha-1), differing from the open V (154.4 t ha-1) and half-stake (0.2 m spacing) systems at higher commercial productivity (158.1 t ha-1). With a production cost below 100 thousand R$ per hectare and a profitability index above 58%, the half-stake and low (0.2 m spacing) cultivation systems proved to be more productive and economically efficient than the open V system, fulfilling the requirements of tomato growers. The creeping system (0.2 m spacing) had the highest percentage of losses (22%) due to non-marketable fruits; Based on damage nature, the half-stake system tomatoes showed black backgrounds and the open and creeping systems showed tomato locules affected by pests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comunicata Scientiae\",\"volume\":\"5 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comunicata Scientiae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14295/cs.v15.4009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comunicata Scientiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14295/cs.v15.4009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了餐桌市场栽培系统的生产率和经济效益。在 "半桩式"、"开放式 V 型 "和 "低矮式 "等 12 种栽培模式下种植了杂交番茄 Fascínio,株距分别为 0.2、0.3、0.4 和 0.5 米,行距为 1.5 米。在果实成熟期采收 11 个果实,并对产量(总产量、商品产量和非商品产量、损失百分比和损害类型)和经济参数(生产成本、收入和利润)进行评估。半秸秆和低秸秆(行距均为 0.2 米)种植系统的总产量最高(179 吨/公顷),而开放式 V 型种植系统(154.4 吨/公顷)和半秸秆(行距为 0.2 米)种植系统的商业生产率较高(158.1 吨/公顷)。每公顷生产成本低于 10 万雷亚尔,盈利指数高于 58%,半垄栽培和低株距(株距 0.2 米)栽培系统的产量和经济效益均高于开放式 V 型栽培系统,符合番茄种植者的要求。匍匐栽培系统(行距 0.2 米)因果实滞销而造成的损失比例最高(22%);根据受害性质,半垄栽培系统的番茄出现黑斑,开放式和匍匐栽培系统的番茄果座受到害虫影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Profitability and efficiency of conduction systems and optimal tomato density for fresh consumption
This study evaluated the productivity and economic profitability of cultivation systems for the table market. A hybrid tomato cultivar, Fascínio was grown in 12 cultivation systems of the “half stake”, “open V”, and “low” types, with four spacings–0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 m between plants and 1.5 m between rows. Eleven fruits were harvested at the mature stage, and the productive (total, commercial, and non-commercial productivity, percentage of losses, and types of damage) and economic (production cost, revenue, and profit) parameters were evaluated. The half-stake and low (both with 0.2 m spacing) cropping systems showed the highest total yields (179 t ha-1), differing from the open V (154.4 t ha-1) and half-stake (0.2 m spacing) systems at higher commercial productivity (158.1 t ha-1). With a production cost below 100 thousand R$ per hectare and a profitability index above 58%, the half-stake and low (0.2 m spacing) cultivation systems proved to be more productive and economically efficient than the open V system, fulfilling the requirements of tomato growers. The creeping system (0.2 m spacing) had the highest percentage of losses (22%) due to non-marketable fruits; Based on damage nature, the half-stake system tomatoes showed black backgrounds and the open and creeping systems showed tomato locules affected by pests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comunicata Scientiae
Comunicata Scientiae Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: The Comunicata Scientiae journal edited by Campus “Profa Cinobelina Elvas” of Federal University of Piauí (Brazil) publishes original articles, scientific notes and review articles (when invited by the editorial board), which present significant importance for Agrarian and Environmental Sciences in Portuguese, Spanish and preferentially, in English.
期刊最新文献
Morphophysiology of Punica Granatum L. under microalgae biomass stimulation Profitability and efficiency of conduction systems and optimal tomato density for fresh consumption Efficiency and economic viability of water management in the production of table tomatoes Agronomic performance and fruit sensory and quality analyses of pineapple cultivars Intercropping lettuce and radish as strategy for efficient water use: determination of water demand and crop coefficient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1