Anjali Banerjee, Andrew Barbera, James Melton, Paul Banerjee
{"title":"院前败血症识别休克指数","authors":"Anjali Banerjee, Andrew Barbera, James Melton, Paul Banerjee","doi":"10.62186/001c.94556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors of this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of prehospital shock index (SI) and modified shock index (MSI) as predictors for sepsis and related outcomes. They aimed to determine whether the SI and MSI correlated with hyperlactatemia, which is considered a marker of sepsis severity and a predictor of poor prognosis. This was a prospective cohort study including all adult patients transported by our county EMS system as per our system’s prehospital sepsis protocol. The study was approved by our medical school’s institutional review board. The study cohort included 1,426 patients. Of these, 969 had an elevated SI. The initial SI ranged from 0.260 to 2.840, with a median of 1.11, and 68% had a “positive” SI (>1.0). The initial MSI ranged from 0.336 to 3.727, with a median of 1.465, and 74% of the cohort had a “positive” MSI (<0.7, or >1.3). Of the patients, 92% had repeat vitals during transport, and the second SI was elevated in 41%. The study found that patients with an elevated SI were significantly more likely to have an elevated lactate (P=0.0309) and be admitted for sepsis (P<0.0001, 95% CI 0.1038 to 0.2714). Patients with an elevated serum lactate were significantly more likely to die during their hospital stay (P<0.0001, 95% CI 0.1503 to 0.3210) with an odds ratio of 2.38 (95% CI 1.59 to 3.56). The study data suggest that an elevated shock index >1 can be used as a surrogate marker for elevated lactate, which in turn correlates with sepsis and poor outcomes following sepsis.","PeriodicalId":516872,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine & Surgery","volume":"48 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shock index for prehospital sepsis recognition\",\"authors\":\"Anjali Banerjee, Andrew Barbera, James Melton, Paul Banerjee\",\"doi\":\"10.62186/001c.94556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors of this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of prehospital shock index (SI) and modified shock index (MSI) as predictors for sepsis and related outcomes. They aimed to determine whether the SI and MSI correlated with hyperlactatemia, which is considered a marker of sepsis severity and a predictor of poor prognosis. This was a prospective cohort study including all adult patients transported by our county EMS system as per our system’s prehospital sepsis protocol. The study was approved by our medical school’s institutional review board. The study cohort included 1,426 patients. Of these, 969 had an elevated SI. The initial SI ranged from 0.260 to 2.840, with a median of 1.11, and 68% had a “positive” SI (>1.0). The initial MSI ranged from 0.336 to 3.727, with a median of 1.465, and 74% of the cohort had a “positive” MSI (<0.7, or >1.3). Of the patients, 92% had repeat vitals during transport, and the second SI was elevated in 41%. The study found that patients with an elevated SI were significantly more likely to have an elevated lactate (P=0.0309) and be admitted for sepsis (P<0.0001, 95% CI 0.1038 to 0.2714). Patients with an elevated serum lactate were significantly more likely to die during their hospital stay (P<0.0001, 95% CI 0.1503 to 0.3210) with an odds ratio of 2.38 (95% CI 1.59 to 3.56). The study data suggest that an elevated shock index >1 can be used as a surrogate marker for elevated lactate, which in turn correlates with sepsis and poor outcomes following sepsis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Medicine & Surgery\",\"volume\":\"48 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Medicine & Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62186/001c.94556\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62186/001c.94556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这项研究的作者旨在评估院前休克指数(SI)和改良休克指数(MSI)作为脓毒症及相关预后预测指标的有效性。他们旨在确定 SI 和 MSI 是否与高乳酸血症相关,高乳酸血症被认为是脓毒症严重程度的标志和预后不良的预测因素。这是一项前瞻性队列研究,包括我们县急救系统根据本系统的院前败血症协议转运的所有成人患者。该研究获得了医学院机构审查委员会的批准。研究队列包括 1426 名患者。其中,969 名患者的 SI 升高。初始 SI 从 0.260 到 2.840 不等,中位数为 1.11,68% 的患者 SI 为 "阳性"(>1.0)。初始 MSI 从 0.336 到 3.727 不等,中位数为 1.465,74% 的患者 MSI 为 "阳性"(1.3)。其中 92% 的患者在转运过程中重复测量了生命体征,41% 的患者第二次 SI 升高。研究发现,SI 升高的患者更有可能出现乳酸升高(P=0.0309)和因脓毒症入院(P1 可作为乳酸升高的替代标志物,而乳酸升高又与脓毒症和脓毒症后的不良预后相关)。
The authors of this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of prehospital shock index (SI) and modified shock index (MSI) as predictors for sepsis and related outcomes. They aimed to determine whether the SI and MSI correlated with hyperlactatemia, which is considered a marker of sepsis severity and a predictor of poor prognosis. This was a prospective cohort study including all adult patients transported by our county EMS system as per our system’s prehospital sepsis protocol. The study was approved by our medical school’s institutional review board. The study cohort included 1,426 patients. Of these, 969 had an elevated SI. The initial SI ranged from 0.260 to 2.840, with a median of 1.11, and 68% had a “positive” SI (>1.0). The initial MSI ranged from 0.336 to 3.727, with a median of 1.465, and 74% of the cohort had a “positive” MSI (<0.7, or >1.3). Of the patients, 92% had repeat vitals during transport, and the second SI was elevated in 41%. The study found that patients with an elevated SI were significantly more likely to have an elevated lactate (P=0.0309) and be admitted for sepsis (P<0.0001, 95% CI 0.1038 to 0.2714). Patients with an elevated serum lactate were significantly more likely to die during their hospital stay (P<0.0001, 95% CI 0.1503 to 0.3210) with an odds ratio of 2.38 (95% CI 1.59 to 3.56). The study data suggest that an elevated shock index >1 can be used as a surrogate marker for elevated lactate, which in turn correlates with sepsis and poor outcomes following sepsis.