Adil Mehmood, Shao Ying Mei, Abuduhaiwaier abuduhelili, Ba dengcairenanrui
{"title":"腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术的比较","authors":"Adil Mehmood, Shao Ying Mei, Abuduhaiwaier abuduhelili, Ba dengcairenanrui","doi":"10.30574/wjbphs.2024.17.2.0097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review article provides a comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) versus open cholecystectomy (OC) for the treatment of gallbladder disease. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, characterized by its minimally invasive approach, has gained popularity over open cholecystectomy due to its perceived advantages in safety, reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, improved cosmesis, and potential cost savings. However, the choice between the two procedures remains subjective and depends on various factors such as patient characteristics, surgical expertise, and specific clinical scenarios. This review synthesizes current evidence from clinical trials and studies to aid clinicians in making informed decisions regarding the selection of the most appropriate surgical approach for individual patients.","PeriodicalId":23738,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences","volume":"336 1‐2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy\",\"authors\":\"Adil Mehmood, Shao Ying Mei, Abuduhaiwaier abuduhelili, Ba dengcairenanrui\",\"doi\":\"10.30574/wjbphs.2024.17.2.0097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This review article provides a comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) versus open cholecystectomy (OC) for the treatment of gallbladder disease. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, characterized by its minimally invasive approach, has gained popularity over open cholecystectomy due to its perceived advantages in safety, reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, improved cosmesis, and potential cost savings. However, the choice between the two procedures remains subjective and depends on various factors such as patient characteristics, surgical expertise, and specific clinical scenarios. This review synthesizes current evidence from clinical trials and studies to aid clinicians in making informed decisions regarding the selection of the most appropriate surgical approach for individual patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"336 1‐2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2024.17.2.0097\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2024.17.2.0097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy
This review article provides a comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) versus open cholecystectomy (OC) for the treatment of gallbladder disease. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, characterized by its minimally invasive approach, has gained popularity over open cholecystectomy due to its perceived advantages in safety, reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, improved cosmesis, and potential cost savings. However, the choice between the two procedures remains subjective and depends on various factors such as patient characteristics, surgical expertise, and specific clinical scenarios. This review synthesizes current evidence from clinical trials and studies to aid clinicians in making informed decisions regarding the selection of the most appropriate surgical approach for individual patients.