马可的恶魔基督论重新评估关于耶稣弥赛亚身份的道义忏悔

Daniel B Glover
{"title":"马可的恶魔基督论重新评估关于耶稣弥赛亚身份的道义忏悔","authors":"Daniel B Glover","doi":"10.1093/jts/flae005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Markan scholars have often taken for granted that the daimonic acclamations of Jesus’s messianic identity in Mark’s Gospel present the author’s own Christological perspective. Giving attention to daimonic speech in Mark’s literary context, however, opens up the interpretive possibility that this daimonic speech may serve to mislead rather than teach. By using insights from the rhetorical practice of prosopopoeia (speech-in-character), this article compares the Christology of Mark’s daimones with a) Jesus’s reliable statements about his own messianic identity and b) Mark’s discursive presentation of the messianic role in order to assess whether the daimonic Christology in Mark’s Gospel is trustworthy or misleading.","PeriodicalId":213560,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Theological Studies","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mark’s Demonic Christology: Reevaluating the Daimonic Confessions of Jesus’s Messiahship\",\"authors\":\"Daniel B Glover\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jts/flae005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Markan scholars have often taken for granted that the daimonic acclamations of Jesus’s messianic identity in Mark’s Gospel present the author’s own Christological perspective. Giving attention to daimonic speech in Mark’s literary context, however, opens up the interpretive possibility that this daimonic speech may serve to mislead rather than teach. By using insights from the rhetorical practice of prosopopoeia (speech-in-character), this article compares the Christology of Mark’s daimones with a) Jesus’s reliable statements about his own messianic identity and b) Mark’s discursive presentation of the messianic role in order to assess whether the daimonic Christology in Mark’s Gospel is trustworthy or misleading.\",\"PeriodicalId\":213560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Theological Studies\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Theological Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flae005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Theological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flae005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

马可学者常常想当然地认为,马可福音中对耶稣弥赛亚身份的戴蒙性赞美呈现了作者自己的基督论观点。然而,关注马可福音文学语境中的 "daimonic speech",则为我们提供了一种解释可能性,即这种 "daimonic speech "可能起到误导而非教导的作用。本文通过运用 "拟人"(prosopopoeia)修辞实践的洞察力,将马可的 "拟人 "基督论与 a) 耶稣关于自己弥赛亚身份的可靠陈述和 b) 马可对弥赛亚角色的话语表述进行比较,以评估马可福音中的 "拟人 "基督论是可信的还是具有误导性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mark’s Demonic Christology: Reevaluating the Daimonic Confessions of Jesus’s Messiahship
Markan scholars have often taken for granted that the daimonic acclamations of Jesus’s messianic identity in Mark’s Gospel present the author’s own Christological perspective. Giving attention to daimonic speech in Mark’s literary context, however, opens up the interpretive possibility that this daimonic speech may serve to mislead rather than teach. By using insights from the rhetorical practice of prosopopoeia (speech-in-character), this article compares the Christology of Mark’s daimones with a) Jesus’s reliable statements about his own messianic identity and b) Mark’s discursive presentation of the messianic role in order to assess whether the daimonic Christology in Mark’s Gospel is trustworthy or misleading.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Prosōpon of Jesus’ Soul in Origen’s Homilies on Psalm 15 (16) The Independent Works of Luke: Further Evidence on the Early Christian Reception of Luke and Acts Theology of the Book of Proverbs. By Katharine J. Dell Gerhard von Rad and the Study of Wisdom Literature. Edited by Timothy J. Sandoval and Bernd U. Schipper The Idea of Israel in Second Temple Judaism: A New Theory of People, Exile, and Israelite Identity. By Jason A. Staples
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1