叶卡捷琳堡第十二医院医学院和北京蒂鲁内什医院对穿孔性消化性溃疡病的处理结果及相关因素

{"title":"叶卡捷琳堡第十二医院医学院和北京蒂鲁内什医院对穿孔性消化性溃疡病的处理结果及相关因素","authors":"","doi":"10.47485/2767-5416.1059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Perforated peptic ulcer disease is one of the emergency surgical conditions of peptic ulcer complications with high mortality and morbidity. Although this emergency condition is prevalent in the study areas it is the first study that showed its magnitude and management outcome.\nObjective: The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome and factors associated with perforated peptic ulcer disease.\nMethodology: A cross-sectional study design was used. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25 and binary logistic regression was used to see factors associated with outcomes. P value ≤0.05 was considered significant.\nResult: A total of 95 patients were studied. Males outnumbered females by a ratio of 8.5:1. The mean and median age of patients was 31.74±13.83 and 27 years respectively. Most perforations were located on the first part of the duodenum (78, 76.5%). Most patients (90, 88.2%) had Graham’s omental patch repair. There were fifty-six post-operative complications recorded in 20 (21.1%) patients. Superficial surgical site infection (10.5%), wound dehiscence (9.5%), respiratory infections (20.1%), sepsis (17.9%), acute kidney injury (12.6%), and ECF (1.1%) were the complications recorded. Co-morbidity [AOR: 19.46 (2.39-158.39)] and SBP<90mmHg [AOR: 5.76 (1.74-19.18)] were significantly associated with post-operative complications. The mortality rate was 5.3% (95% CI: 1.7% to 11.9%) and only co-morbidity [AOR: 10.85 (7.64, 15.40)] was stastically associated with mortality.\nConclusion: The mortality rate of this study was low as compared with the majority of studies done the country and the region.","PeriodicalId":94090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical clinical case reports","volume":"30 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management Outcome and Associated Factors of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease at Yekatit 12 Hospital Medical College and Tirunesh Beijing Hospital\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.47485/2767-5416.1059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Perforated peptic ulcer disease is one of the emergency surgical conditions of peptic ulcer complications with high mortality and morbidity. Although this emergency condition is prevalent in the study areas it is the first study that showed its magnitude and management outcome.\\nObjective: The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome and factors associated with perforated peptic ulcer disease.\\nMethodology: A cross-sectional study design was used. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25 and binary logistic regression was used to see factors associated with outcomes. P value ≤0.05 was considered significant.\\nResult: A total of 95 patients were studied. Males outnumbered females by a ratio of 8.5:1. The mean and median age of patients was 31.74±13.83 and 27 years respectively. Most perforations were located on the first part of the duodenum (78, 76.5%). Most patients (90, 88.2%) had Graham’s omental patch repair. There were fifty-six post-operative complications recorded in 20 (21.1%) patients. Superficial surgical site infection (10.5%), wound dehiscence (9.5%), respiratory infections (20.1%), sepsis (17.9%), acute kidney injury (12.6%), and ECF (1.1%) were the complications recorded. Co-morbidity [AOR: 19.46 (2.39-158.39)] and SBP<90mmHg [AOR: 5.76 (1.74-19.18)] were significantly associated with post-operative complications. The mortality rate was 5.3% (95% CI: 1.7% to 11.9%) and only co-morbidity [AOR: 10.85 (7.64, 15.40)] was stastically associated with mortality.\\nConclusion: The mortality rate of this study was low as compared with the majority of studies done the country and the region.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of medical clinical case reports\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of medical clinical case reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47485/2767-5416.1059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical clinical case reports","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47485/2767-5416.1059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:消化性溃疡穿孔是消化性溃疡并发症中的一种急诊外科疾病,死亡率和发病率都很高。虽然这种急症在研究地区很普遍,但这是首次显示其严重程度和治疗结果的研究:本研究旨在确定与消化性溃疡穿孔相关的结果和因素:采用横断面研究设计。使用 SPSS 25 版对数据进行分析,并使用二元逻辑回归分析与结果相关的因素。P值小于0.05为差异显著:共有 95 名患者接受了研究。男性多于女性,比例为 8.5:1。患者的平均年龄(31.74±13.83)岁,中位年龄(27)岁。大多数穿孔位于十二指肠的前段(78 例,76.5%)。大多数患者(90人,88.2%)进行了格雷厄姆网膜修补术。20名患者(21.1%)出现了56例术后并发症。并发症包括手术部位感染(10.5%)、伤口裂开(9.5%)、呼吸道感染(20.1%)、败血症(17.9%)、急性肾损伤(12.6%)和心肌缺血(1.1%)。并发症[AOR:19.46 (2.39-158.39)]和 SBP<90mmHg [AOR:5.76 (1.74-19.18)]与术后并发症显著相关。死亡率为 5.3% (95% CI: 1.7% to 11.9%),只有合并疾病 [AOR: 10.85 (7.64, 15.40)]与死亡率密切相关:与国内和本地区的大多数研究相比,本研究的死亡率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Management Outcome and Associated Factors of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease at Yekatit 12 Hospital Medical College and Tirunesh Beijing Hospital
Background: Perforated peptic ulcer disease is one of the emergency surgical conditions of peptic ulcer complications with high mortality and morbidity. Although this emergency condition is prevalent in the study areas it is the first study that showed its magnitude and management outcome. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome and factors associated with perforated peptic ulcer disease. Methodology: A cross-sectional study design was used. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25 and binary logistic regression was used to see factors associated with outcomes. P value ≤0.05 was considered significant. Result: A total of 95 patients were studied. Males outnumbered females by a ratio of 8.5:1. The mean and median age of patients was 31.74±13.83 and 27 years respectively. Most perforations were located on the first part of the duodenum (78, 76.5%). Most patients (90, 88.2%) had Graham’s omental patch repair. There were fifty-six post-operative complications recorded in 20 (21.1%) patients. Superficial surgical site infection (10.5%), wound dehiscence (9.5%), respiratory infections (20.1%), sepsis (17.9%), acute kidney injury (12.6%), and ECF (1.1%) were the complications recorded. Co-morbidity [AOR: 19.46 (2.39-158.39)] and SBP<90mmHg [AOR: 5.76 (1.74-19.18)] were significantly associated with post-operative complications. The mortality rate was 5.3% (95% CI: 1.7% to 11.9%) and only co-morbidity [AOR: 10.85 (7.64, 15.40)] was stastically associated with mortality. Conclusion: The mortality rate of this study was low as compared with the majority of studies done the country and the region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Unusual Pulmonary Lobe Purple Urine Bag Syndrome A Rare Case Report A Recurrent Giant Phyllodes Tumor with Review of Literatures Microperforate Hymen Presenting as Vaginismus: Management and Literature Review Management Outcome and Associated Factors of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease at Yekatit 12 Hospital Medical College and Tirunesh Beijing Hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1