基于 MDM 方法的学习管理系统评估

Teme Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.22190/teme230209058p
Đorđe Pucar, Gabrijela Popović, Goran Milovanović
{"title":"基于 MDM 方法的学习管理系统评估","authors":"Đorđe Pucar, Gabrijela Popović, Goran Milovanović","doi":"10.22190/teme230209058p","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper proposes a Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods-based approach to assess Learning Management Systems (LMS). The proposed approach includes the objective weighting method MEREC, used to determine the criteria weights, and CRADIS, applied in assessing alternatives and choosing the optimal one. It is revealed that the objectivity degree decreases when the qualitative type of criteria, which strongly depends on the subjective opinion of decision-makers, is used. The proposed approach gave adequate results, confirmed by conducting a sensitivity analysis based on the TOPSIS, ARAS, and MARCOS methods, and by comparing the results with similar research studies.","PeriodicalId":31832,"journal":{"name":"Teme","volume":"62 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MCDM METHODS-BASED ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS\",\"authors\":\"Đorđe Pucar, Gabrijela Popović, Goran Milovanović\",\"doi\":\"10.22190/teme230209058p\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper proposes a Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods-based approach to assess Learning Management Systems (LMS). The proposed approach includes the objective weighting method MEREC, used to determine the criteria weights, and CRADIS, applied in assessing alternatives and choosing the optimal one. It is revealed that the objectivity degree decreases when the qualitative type of criteria, which strongly depends on the subjective opinion of decision-makers, is used. The proposed approach gave adequate results, confirmed by conducting a sensitivity analysis based on the TOPSIS, ARAS, and MARCOS methods, and by comparing the results with similar research studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teme\",\"volume\":\"62 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22190/teme230209058p\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22190/teme230209058p","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一种基于多重标准决策(MCDM)方法的学习管理系统(LMS)评估方法。该方法包括用于确定标准权重的客观加权法 MEREC 和用于评估备选方案并选择最优方案的 CRADIS。结果表明,当使用定性标准时,客观程度会降低,因为定性标准在很大程度上取决于决策者的主观意见。通过基于 TOPSIS、ARAS 和 MARCOS 方法进行敏感性分析,并将结果与类似的研究成果进行比较,证实了所提出的方法能够提供充分的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MCDM METHODS-BASED ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
The paper proposes a Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods-based approach to assess Learning Management Systems (LMS). The proposed approach includes the objective weighting method MEREC, used to determine the criteria weights, and CRADIS, applied in assessing alternatives and choosing the optimal one. It is revealed that the objectivity degree decreases when the qualitative type of criteria, which strongly depends on the subjective opinion of decision-makers, is used. The proposed approach gave adequate results, confirmed by conducting a sensitivity analysis based on the TOPSIS, ARAS, and MARCOS methods, and by comparing the results with similar research studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
THE PREFERRED EXTERNALITIES-CORRECTING SYSTEM FOR PRACTICAL APPLICATION TENETS OF THE SLOW FOOD MOVEMENT AS MOTIVATION FOR TOURISTS TO VISIT RURAL TOURIST HOUSEHOLDS IN SERBIA DOES EMPLOYER BRANDING RETAIN EMPLOYEES? JOB SATISFACTION AS A MEDIATOR SERBIAN EXPORT TO THE EU MARKET: A DYNAMIC SHIFT-SHARE ANALYSIS CRYPTOCURRENCIES AND CRIME
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1